Improving the quality of pressure ulcer care with prevention a cost-effectiveness analysis

William Padula, Manish K. Mishra, Mary Beth F. Makic, Patrick W. Sullivan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: In October 2008, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services discontinued reimbursement for hospital-acquired pressure ulcers (HAPUs), thus placing stress on hospitals to prevent incidence of this costly condition. Objective: To evaluate whether prevention methods are costeffective compared with standard care in the management of HAPUs. Research Design and Subjects: A semi-Markov model simulated the admission of patients to an acute care hospital from the time of admission through 1 year using the societal perspective. The model simulated health states that could potentially lead to an HAPU through either the practice of "prevention" or "standard care." Univariate sensitivity analyses, threshold analyses, and Bayesian multivariate probabilistic sensitivity analysis using 10,000 Monte Carlo simulations were conducted. Measures: Cost per quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained for the prevention of HAPUs. Results: Prevention was cost saving and resulted in greater expected effectiveness compared with the standard care approach per hospitalization. The expected cost of prevention was $7276.35, and the expected effectiveness was 11.241 QALYs. The expected cost for standard care was $10,053.95, and the expected effectiveness was 9.342 QALYs. The multivariate probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that prevention resulted in cost savings in 99.99% of the simulations. The threshold cost of prevention was $821.53 per day per person, whereas the cost of prevention was estimated to be $54.66 per day per person. Conclusion: This study suggests that it is more cost effective to pay for prevention of HAPUs compared with standard care. Continuous preventive care of HAPUs in acutely ill patients could potentially reduce incidence and prevalence, as well as lead to lower expenditures.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)385-392
Number of pages8
JournalMedical Care
Volume49
Issue number4
StatePublished - 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Pressure Ulcer
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Costs and Cost Analysis
Quality-Adjusted Life Years
Research Subjects
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (U.S.)
Preventive Medicine
Bayes Theorem
Cost Savings
Patient Admission
Incidence
Health Expenditures
Hospitalization
Research Design
Multivariate Analysis
Health

Keywords

  • Cost-effectiveness
  • Medicare
  • Pressure ulcers
  • Preventive medicine
  • Quality

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Padula, W., Mishra, M. K., Makic, M. B. F., & Sullivan, P. W. (2011). Improving the quality of pressure ulcer care with prevention a cost-effectiveness analysis. Medical Care, 49(4), 385-392.

Improving the quality of pressure ulcer care with prevention a cost-effectiveness analysis. / Padula, William; Mishra, Manish K.; Makic, Mary Beth F.; Sullivan, Patrick W.

In: Medical Care, Vol. 49, No. 4, 2011, p. 385-392.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Padula, W, Mishra, MK, Makic, MBF & Sullivan, PW 2011, 'Improving the quality of pressure ulcer care with prevention a cost-effectiveness analysis', Medical Care, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 385-392.
Padula W, Mishra MK, Makic MBF, Sullivan PW. Improving the quality of pressure ulcer care with prevention a cost-effectiveness analysis. Medical Care. 2011;49(4):385-392.
Padula, William ; Mishra, Manish K. ; Makic, Mary Beth F. ; Sullivan, Patrick W. / Improving the quality of pressure ulcer care with prevention a cost-effectiveness analysis. In: Medical Care. 2011 ; Vol. 49, No. 4. pp. 385-392.
@article{553859bb50ed4136ad1d3ae1f2a0e160,
title = "Improving the quality of pressure ulcer care with prevention a cost-effectiveness analysis",
abstract = "Background: In October 2008, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services discontinued reimbursement for hospital-acquired pressure ulcers (HAPUs), thus placing stress on hospitals to prevent incidence of this costly condition. Objective: To evaluate whether prevention methods are costeffective compared with standard care in the management of HAPUs. Research Design and Subjects: A semi-Markov model simulated the admission of patients to an acute care hospital from the time of admission through 1 year using the societal perspective. The model simulated health states that could potentially lead to an HAPU through either the practice of {"}prevention{"} or {"}standard care.{"} Univariate sensitivity analyses, threshold analyses, and Bayesian multivariate probabilistic sensitivity analysis using 10,000 Monte Carlo simulations were conducted. Measures: Cost per quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained for the prevention of HAPUs. Results: Prevention was cost saving and resulted in greater expected effectiveness compared with the standard care approach per hospitalization. The expected cost of prevention was $7276.35, and the expected effectiveness was 11.241 QALYs. The expected cost for standard care was $10,053.95, and the expected effectiveness was 9.342 QALYs. The multivariate probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that prevention resulted in cost savings in 99.99{\%} of the simulations. The threshold cost of prevention was $821.53 per day per person, whereas the cost of prevention was estimated to be $54.66 per day per person. Conclusion: This study suggests that it is more cost effective to pay for prevention of HAPUs compared with standard care. Continuous preventive care of HAPUs in acutely ill patients could potentially reduce incidence and prevalence, as well as lead to lower expenditures.",
keywords = "Cost-effectiveness, Medicare, Pressure ulcers, Preventive medicine, Quality",
author = "William Padula and Mishra, {Manish K.} and Makic, {Mary Beth F.} and Sullivan, {Patrick W.}",
year = "2011",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "49",
pages = "385--392",
journal = "Medical Care",
issn = "0025-7079",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Improving the quality of pressure ulcer care with prevention a cost-effectiveness analysis

AU - Padula, William

AU - Mishra, Manish K.

AU - Makic, Mary Beth F.

AU - Sullivan, Patrick W.

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Background: In October 2008, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services discontinued reimbursement for hospital-acquired pressure ulcers (HAPUs), thus placing stress on hospitals to prevent incidence of this costly condition. Objective: To evaluate whether prevention methods are costeffective compared with standard care in the management of HAPUs. Research Design and Subjects: A semi-Markov model simulated the admission of patients to an acute care hospital from the time of admission through 1 year using the societal perspective. The model simulated health states that could potentially lead to an HAPU through either the practice of "prevention" or "standard care." Univariate sensitivity analyses, threshold analyses, and Bayesian multivariate probabilistic sensitivity analysis using 10,000 Monte Carlo simulations were conducted. Measures: Cost per quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained for the prevention of HAPUs. Results: Prevention was cost saving and resulted in greater expected effectiveness compared with the standard care approach per hospitalization. The expected cost of prevention was $7276.35, and the expected effectiveness was 11.241 QALYs. The expected cost for standard care was $10,053.95, and the expected effectiveness was 9.342 QALYs. The multivariate probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that prevention resulted in cost savings in 99.99% of the simulations. The threshold cost of prevention was $821.53 per day per person, whereas the cost of prevention was estimated to be $54.66 per day per person. Conclusion: This study suggests that it is more cost effective to pay for prevention of HAPUs compared with standard care. Continuous preventive care of HAPUs in acutely ill patients could potentially reduce incidence and prevalence, as well as lead to lower expenditures.

AB - Background: In October 2008, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services discontinued reimbursement for hospital-acquired pressure ulcers (HAPUs), thus placing stress on hospitals to prevent incidence of this costly condition. Objective: To evaluate whether prevention methods are costeffective compared with standard care in the management of HAPUs. Research Design and Subjects: A semi-Markov model simulated the admission of patients to an acute care hospital from the time of admission through 1 year using the societal perspective. The model simulated health states that could potentially lead to an HAPU through either the practice of "prevention" or "standard care." Univariate sensitivity analyses, threshold analyses, and Bayesian multivariate probabilistic sensitivity analysis using 10,000 Monte Carlo simulations were conducted. Measures: Cost per quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained for the prevention of HAPUs. Results: Prevention was cost saving and resulted in greater expected effectiveness compared with the standard care approach per hospitalization. The expected cost of prevention was $7276.35, and the expected effectiveness was 11.241 QALYs. The expected cost for standard care was $10,053.95, and the expected effectiveness was 9.342 QALYs. The multivariate probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that prevention resulted in cost savings in 99.99% of the simulations. The threshold cost of prevention was $821.53 per day per person, whereas the cost of prevention was estimated to be $54.66 per day per person. Conclusion: This study suggests that it is more cost effective to pay for prevention of HAPUs compared with standard care. Continuous preventive care of HAPUs in acutely ill patients could potentially reduce incidence and prevalence, as well as lead to lower expenditures.

KW - Cost-effectiveness

KW - Medicare

KW - Pressure ulcers

KW - Preventive medicine

KW - Quality

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85027939533&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85027939533&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85027939533

VL - 49

SP - 385

EP - 392

JO - Medical Care

JF - Medical Care

SN - 0025-7079

IS - 4

ER -