TY - JOUR
T1 - Improving Outcomes After Hospitalization
T2 - A Prospective Observational Multicenter Evaluation of Care Coordination Strategies for Reducing 30-Day Readmissions to Maryland Hospitals
AU - Hoyer, Erik H.
AU - Brotman, Daniel J.
AU - Apfel, Ariella
AU - Leung, Curtis
AU - Boonyasai, Romsai T.
AU - Richardson, Melissa
AU - Lepley, Diane
AU - Deutschendorf, Amy
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017, Society of General Internal Medicine.
PY - 2018/5/1
Y1 - 2018/5/1
N2 - Background: Patients frequently experience suboptimal transitions from the hospital to the community, which can increase the likelihood of readmission. It is not known which care coordination services can lead to improvements in readmission rates. Objective: To evaluate the effects of two care coordination interventions on 30-day readmission rates. Design: Prospective multicenter observational study of hospitalized patients eligible for two care coordination services between January 1, 2013, and October 31, 2015. Readmission rates were compared for patients who received each care coordination intervention versus those who did not using multivariable generalized estimating equation logistic regression models. Participants: A total of 25,628 patients hospitalized in medicine, neurosciences, or surgical sciences units. Interventions: Patients discharged home and deemed to be at high risk for readmission were assigned a nurse Transition Guide (TG) for 30 days post-discharge. All other patients were assigned the Patient Access Line (PAL) intervention, which provided a post-discharge phone call from a registered nurse. Setting: Two large academic hospitals in Baltimore, MD. Main Measures: Thirty-day all-cause readmission to any Maryland hospital. Key Results: Among all patients, 14.2% (2409/16,993) of those referred for the PAL intervention and 22.8% (1973/8635) of those referred for the TG intervention were readmitted. PAL-referred patients who did not receive the intervention had an adjusted odds ratio (aOR) for readmission of 1.27 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.12–1.44, p < 0.001) compared with patients who did. TG-referred patients who did not receive the TG intervention had an aOR of 1.83 (95% CI 1.60–2.10, p < 0.001) compared with patients who received the intervention. Younger age, male sex, having more comorbidities, and being discharged from a medicine unit were associated with not receiving an assigned intervention. These characteristics were also associated with higher readmission rates. Conclusions: PAL and TG care coordination interventions were associated with lower rates of 30-day readmission. Our findings underscore the importance of determining the appropriate intervention for the hardest-to-reach patients, who are also at the highest risk of being readmitted.
AB - Background: Patients frequently experience suboptimal transitions from the hospital to the community, which can increase the likelihood of readmission. It is not known which care coordination services can lead to improvements in readmission rates. Objective: To evaluate the effects of two care coordination interventions on 30-day readmission rates. Design: Prospective multicenter observational study of hospitalized patients eligible for two care coordination services between January 1, 2013, and October 31, 2015. Readmission rates were compared for patients who received each care coordination intervention versus those who did not using multivariable generalized estimating equation logistic regression models. Participants: A total of 25,628 patients hospitalized in medicine, neurosciences, or surgical sciences units. Interventions: Patients discharged home and deemed to be at high risk for readmission were assigned a nurse Transition Guide (TG) for 30 days post-discharge. All other patients were assigned the Patient Access Line (PAL) intervention, which provided a post-discharge phone call from a registered nurse. Setting: Two large academic hospitals in Baltimore, MD. Main Measures: Thirty-day all-cause readmission to any Maryland hospital. Key Results: Among all patients, 14.2% (2409/16,993) of those referred for the PAL intervention and 22.8% (1973/8635) of those referred for the TG intervention were readmitted. PAL-referred patients who did not receive the intervention had an adjusted odds ratio (aOR) for readmission of 1.27 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.12–1.44, p < 0.001) compared with patients who did. TG-referred patients who did not receive the TG intervention had an aOR of 1.83 (95% CI 1.60–2.10, p < 0.001) compared with patients who received the intervention. Younger age, male sex, having more comorbidities, and being discharged from a medicine unit were associated with not receiving an assigned intervention. These characteristics were also associated with higher readmission rates. Conclusions: PAL and TG care coordination interventions were associated with lower rates of 30-day readmission. Our findings underscore the importance of determining the appropriate intervention for the hardest-to-reach patients, who are also at the highest risk of being readmitted.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85035078127&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85035078127&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11606-017-4218-4
DO - 10.1007/s11606-017-4218-4
M3 - Article
C2 - 29181790
AN - SCOPUS:85035078127
SN - 0884-8734
VL - 33
SP - 621
EP - 627
JO - Journal of general internal medicine
JF - Journal of general internal medicine
IS - 5
ER -