Improving care for the ventilated patient.

Sean M. Berenholtz, Shelley Milanovich, Amanda Faircloth, Donna T. Prow, Karen Earsing, Pamela Lipsett, Todd Dorman, Peter J. Pronovost

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

CONTEXT: Despite evidence that the use of specific interventions can decrease morbidity and mortality for patients receiving mechanical ventilation, a gap exists between best evidence and practice. A prospective cohort study was conducted in a surgical intensive care unit (ICU) that included all patients who were mechanically ventilated. The study was designed to ensure that for 90% of ventilator days, patients receive processes associated with improved outcomes, including semirecumbent positioning, daily interruption of sedative-drug infusions, peptic ulcer disease prophylaxis, and deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis. INTERVENTION: The improvement model included three interventions: (1) administering a questionnaire to identify barriers to compliance with the four care processes, (2) implementing an educational intervention, and (3) implementing a checklist to be completed daily during ICU rounds to ask providers whether patients were receiving these therapies. RESULTS: Overall, 80% of nurses did not know there was evidence to support at least one of the four therapies. During the study period (March 4-April 29, 2002), the percentage of ventilator days on which patients received all four care processes increased from 30% to 96% (p < .001). DISCUSSION: Evidence-based therapies for mechanically ventilated patients can reduce morbidity, mortality, and costs of care.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)195-204
Number of pages10
JournalJoint Commission journal on quality and safety
Volume30
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2004

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Improving care for the ventilated patient.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this