TY - JOUR
T1 - Improving cancer outcomes through international collaboration in academic cancer treatment trials
AU - Trimble, Edward L.
AU - Abrams, Jeffrey S.
AU - Meyer, Ralph M.
AU - Calvo, Fabien
AU - Cazap, Eduardo
AU - Deye, James
AU - Eisenhauer, Elizabeth
AU - Fitzgerald, Thomas J.
AU - Lacombe, Denis
AU - Parmar, Max
AU - Seibel, Nita
AU - Shankar, Lalitha
AU - Swart, Ann Marie
AU - Therasse, Patrick
AU - Vikram, Bhadrasain
AU - Von Frenckell, Remy
AU - Friedlander, Michael
AU - Fujiwara, Keiichi
AU - Kaplan, Richard S.
AU - Meunier, Francoise
PY - 2009/10/20
Y1 - 2009/10/20
N2 - Purpose: The need for international collaboration in cancer clinical trials has grown stronger as we have made progress both in cancer treatment and screening. We sought to identify those efforts already underway which facilitate such collaboration, as well as barriers to greater collaboration. Methods: We reviewed the collective experiences of many cooperative groups, governmental organizations, nongovernmental organizations, and academic investigators in their work to build international collaboration in cancer clinical trials across multiple disease sites. Results: More than a decade of work has led to effective global harmonization for many of the elements critical to cancer clinical trials. Many barriers remain, but effective international collaboration in academic cancer treatment trials should become the norm, rather than the exception. Conclusion: Our ability to strengthen international collaborations will result in maximization of our resources and patients, permitting us to change practice by establishing more effective therapeutic strategies. Regulatory, logistical, and financial hurdles, however, often hamper the conduct of joint trials. We must work together as a global community to overcome these barriers so that we may continue to improve cancer treatment for patients around the world.
AB - Purpose: The need for international collaboration in cancer clinical trials has grown stronger as we have made progress both in cancer treatment and screening. We sought to identify those efforts already underway which facilitate such collaboration, as well as barriers to greater collaboration. Methods: We reviewed the collective experiences of many cooperative groups, governmental organizations, nongovernmental organizations, and academic investigators in their work to build international collaboration in cancer clinical trials across multiple disease sites. Results: More than a decade of work has led to effective global harmonization for many of the elements critical to cancer clinical trials. Many barriers remain, but effective international collaboration in academic cancer treatment trials should become the norm, rather than the exception. Conclusion: Our ability to strengthen international collaborations will result in maximization of our resources and patients, permitting us to change practice by establishing more effective therapeutic strategies. Regulatory, logistical, and financial hurdles, however, often hamper the conduct of joint trials. We must work together as a global community to overcome these barriers so that we may continue to improve cancer treatment for patients around the world.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77649159312&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77649159312&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1200/JCO.2009.22.5771
DO - 10.1200/JCO.2009.22.5771
M3 - Review article
C2 - 19720905
AN - SCOPUS:77649159312
SN - 0732-183X
VL - 27
SP - 5109
EP - 5114
JO - Journal of Clinical Oncology
JF - Journal of Clinical Oncology
IS - 30
ER -