Improved cytodiagnostics and quality of patient care through double reading of selected cases by an expert cytopathologist

Chantal C H J Kuijpers, Mike Visser, Daisy M D S Sie-Go, Henk de Leeuw, Mathilda J. de Rooij, Paul J. van Diest, Mehdi Jiwa

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Double reading may be a valuable tool for improving the quality of patient care by restoring diagnostic errors before final sign-out, but standard double reading would significantly increase costs of pathology. The aim of this study was to assess the added value of routine double reading of defined categories of clinical cytology specimens by specialized cytopathologists. Specialized cytopathologists routinely re-diagnosed blinded defined categories of clinical cytology specimens that had been signed out by routine pathologists from January 2012 up to December 2013. Major and minor discordance rates between initial and expert diagnoses were determined, and both diagnoses were validated by comparison with same-site histological follow-up. Initial and expert diagnoses were concordant in 131/218 specimens (60.1 %). Major and minor discordances were present in 28 (12.8 %) and 59 (27.1 %) specimens, respectively. Pleural fluid, thyroid and urine specimens showed the highest major discordance rates (19.4, 19.2 and 16.7 %, respectively). Histological follow-up (where possible) supported the expert diagnosis in 95.5 % of specimens. Our implemented double reading strategy of defined categories of cytology specimens showed major discordance in 12.8 % of specimens. The expert diagnosis was supported in 95.5 % of discordant cases where histological follow-up was available. This indicates that this double reading strategy is worthwhile and contributes to better cytodiagnostics and quality of patient care, especially for suspicious pleural fluid, thyroid and urine specimens. Our results emphasize that cytopathology is a subspecialization of pathology and requires specialized cytopathologists.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)617-624
Number of pages8
JournalVirchows Archiv
Volume466
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 17 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Quality of Health Care
Reading
Patient Care
Cell Biology
Thyroid Gland
Urine
Pathology
Diagnostic Errors
Costs and Cost Analysis

Keywords

  • Cytopathology
  • Diagnostic accuracy
  • Patient safety
  • Quality assurance
  • Subspecialization

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Cell Biology
  • Molecular Biology

Cite this

Kuijpers, C. C. H. J., Visser, M., Sie-Go, D. M. D. S., de Leeuw, H., de Rooij, M. J., van Diest, P. J., & Jiwa, M. (2015). Improved cytodiagnostics and quality of patient care through double reading of selected cases by an expert cytopathologist. Virchows Archiv, 466(6), 617-624. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-015-1738-3

Improved cytodiagnostics and quality of patient care through double reading of selected cases by an expert cytopathologist. / Kuijpers, Chantal C H J; Visser, Mike; Sie-Go, Daisy M D S; de Leeuw, Henk; de Rooij, Mathilda J.; van Diest, Paul J.; Jiwa, Mehdi.

In: Virchows Archiv, Vol. 466, No. 6, 17.03.2015, p. 617-624.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kuijpers, CCHJ, Visser, M, Sie-Go, DMDS, de Leeuw, H, de Rooij, MJ, van Diest, PJ & Jiwa, M 2015, 'Improved cytodiagnostics and quality of patient care through double reading of selected cases by an expert cytopathologist', Virchows Archiv, vol. 466, no. 6, pp. 617-624. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-015-1738-3
Kuijpers, Chantal C H J ; Visser, Mike ; Sie-Go, Daisy M D S ; de Leeuw, Henk ; de Rooij, Mathilda J. ; van Diest, Paul J. ; Jiwa, Mehdi. / Improved cytodiagnostics and quality of patient care through double reading of selected cases by an expert cytopathologist. In: Virchows Archiv. 2015 ; Vol. 466, No. 6. pp. 617-624.
@article{e8e1aa0af8044c3986ba4dc52f2da79e,
title = "Improved cytodiagnostics and quality of patient care through double reading of selected cases by an expert cytopathologist",
abstract = "Double reading may be a valuable tool for improving the quality of patient care by restoring diagnostic errors before final sign-out, but standard double reading would significantly increase costs of pathology. The aim of this study was to assess the added value of routine double reading of defined categories of clinical cytology specimens by specialized cytopathologists. Specialized cytopathologists routinely re-diagnosed blinded defined categories of clinical cytology specimens that had been signed out by routine pathologists from January 2012 up to December 2013. Major and minor discordance rates between initial and expert diagnoses were determined, and both diagnoses were validated by comparison with same-site histological follow-up. Initial and expert diagnoses were concordant in 131/218 specimens (60.1 {\%}). Major and minor discordances were present in 28 (12.8 {\%}) and 59 (27.1 {\%}) specimens, respectively. Pleural fluid, thyroid and urine specimens showed the highest major discordance rates (19.4, 19.2 and 16.7 {\%}, respectively). Histological follow-up (where possible) supported the expert diagnosis in 95.5 {\%} of specimens. Our implemented double reading strategy of defined categories of cytology specimens showed major discordance in 12.8 {\%} of specimens. The expert diagnosis was supported in 95.5 {\%} of discordant cases where histological follow-up was available. This indicates that this double reading strategy is worthwhile and contributes to better cytodiagnostics and quality of patient care, especially for suspicious pleural fluid, thyroid and urine specimens. Our results emphasize that cytopathology is a subspecialization of pathology and requires specialized cytopathologists.",
keywords = "Cytopathology, Diagnostic accuracy, Patient safety, Quality assurance, Subspecialization",
author = "Kuijpers, {Chantal C H J} and Mike Visser and Sie-Go, {Daisy M D S} and {de Leeuw}, Henk and {de Rooij}, {Mathilda J.} and {van Diest}, {Paul J.} and Mehdi Jiwa",
year = "2015",
month = "3",
day = "17",
doi = "10.1007/s00428-015-1738-3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "466",
pages = "617--624",
journal = "Virchows Archiv",
issn = "0945-6317",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Improved cytodiagnostics and quality of patient care through double reading of selected cases by an expert cytopathologist

AU - Kuijpers, Chantal C H J

AU - Visser, Mike

AU - Sie-Go, Daisy M D S

AU - de Leeuw, Henk

AU - de Rooij, Mathilda J.

AU - van Diest, Paul J.

AU - Jiwa, Mehdi

PY - 2015/3/17

Y1 - 2015/3/17

N2 - Double reading may be a valuable tool for improving the quality of patient care by restoring diagnostic errors before final sign-out, but standard double reading would significantly increase costs of pathology. The aim of this study was to assess the added value of routine double reading of defined categories of clinical cytology specimens by specialized cytopathologists. Specialized cytopathologists routinely re-diagnosed blinded defined categories of clinical cytology specimens that had been signed out by routine pathologists from January 2012 up to December 2013. Major and minor discordance rates between initial and expert diagnoses were determined, and both diagnoses were validated by comparison with same-site histological follow-up. Initial and expert diagnoses were concordant in 131/218 specimens (60.1 %). Major and minor discordances were present in 28 (12.8 %) and 59 (27.1 %) specimens, respectively. Pleural fluid, thyroid and urine specimens showed the highest major discordance rates (19.4, 19.2 and 16.7 %, respectively). Histological follow-up (where possible) supported the expert diagnosis in 95.5 % of specimens. Our implemented double reading strategy of defined categories of cytology specimens showed major discordance in 12.8 % of specimens. The expert diagnosis was supported in 95.5 % of discordant cases where histological follow-up was available. This indicates that this double reading strategy is worthwhile and contributes to better cytodiagnostics and quality of patient care, especially for suspicious pleural fluid, thyroid and urine specimens. Our results emphasize that cytopathology is a subspecialization of pathology and requires specialized cytopathologists.

AB - Double reading may be a valuable tool for improving the quality of patient care by restoring diagnostic errors before final sign-out, but standard double reading would significantly increase costs of pathology. The aim of this study was to assess the added value of routine double reading of defined categories of clinical cytology specimens by specialized cytopathologists. Specialized cytopathologists routinely re-diagnosed blinded defined categories of clinical cytology specimens that had been signed out by routine pathologists from January 2012 up to December 2013. Major and minor discordance rates between initial and expert diagnoses were determined, and both diagnoses were validated by comparison with same-site histological follow-up. Initial and expert diagnoses were concordant in 131/218 specimens (60.1 %). Major and minor discordances were present in 28 (12.8 %) and 59 (27.1 %) specimens, respectively. Pleural fluid, thyroid and urine specimens showed the highest major discordance rates (19.4, 19.2 and 16.7 %, respectively). Histological follow-up (where possible) supported the expert diagnosis in 95.5 % of specimens. Our implemented double reading strategy of defined categories of cytology specimens showed major discordance in 12.8 % of specimens. The expert diagnosis was supported in 95.5 % of discordant cases where histological follow-up was available. This indicates that this double reading strategy is worthwhile and contributes to better cytodiagnostics and quality of patient care, especially for suspicious pleural fluid, thyroid and urine specimens. Our results emphasize that cytopathology is a subspecialization of pathology and requires specialized cytopathologists.

KW - Cytopathology

KW - Diagnostic accuracy

KW - Patient safety

KW - Quality assurance

KW - Subspecialization

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84930766604&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84930766604&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00428-015-1738-3

DO - 10.1007/s00428-015-1738-3

M3 - Article

C2 - 25775953

AN - SCOPUS:84930766604

VL - 466

SP - 617

EP - 624

JO - Virchows Archiv

JF - Virchows Archiv

SN - 0945-6317

IS - 6

ER -