Implicit learning of a motor skill after mild and moderate stroke

Patricia S. Pohl, J. M. McDowd, D. Filion, L. G. Richards, William Stiers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: To determine if adults in the subacute phase post moderate or mild stroke could learn a motor task under implicit practice conditions. Design: Non-randomized, between-group design. Setting: Subjects' homes. Subjects: Sample of convenience of 15 adults with moderate stroke, 22 adults with mild stroke, and 32 age-matched controls. Stroke severity was determined using the Orpington Prognostic Scale. Intervention: Practice of movements to target switches in two conditions, a repeated series and a random series. Practice was organized into a single session of six blocks of 80 trials such that blocks 1 and 2 were the random series, blocks 3 and 4 the repeated series, block 5 the random series, and block 6 the repeated series. Explicit knowledge of the two conditions was not provided. Main measure s: The mean response time and the coefficient of variation were calculated for each block for each group. Results: Regardless of group, participants had a slower response time when practice was unexpectedly switched from the repeated to random condition. The response time and coefficient of variation for those with moderate stroke were persistently greater than those with mild stroke and controls, who were not different from each other. Conclusions: Implicit motor learning is preserved in adults with moderate stroke and may be a viable strategy for teaching motor skills in rehabilitation. The clinician should be aware that subjects with moderate stroke, even when performing with the less affected upper extremity, have significantly slower and more variable movements than those with mild stroke and controls.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)246-253
Number of pages8
JournalClinical Rehabilitation
Volume20
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Motor Skills
Stroke
Learning
Reaction Time
Upper Extremity
Teaching
Rehabilitation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rehabilitation
  • Health Professions(all)

Cite this

Implicit learning of a motor skill after mild and moderate stroke. / Pohl, Patricia S.; McDowd, J. M.; Filion, D.; Richards, L. G.; Stiers, William.

In: Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 20, No. 3, 03.2006, p. 246-253.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Pohl, Patricia S. ; McDowd, J. M. ; Filion, D. ; Richards, L. G. ; Stiers, William. / Implicit learning of a motor skill after mild and moderate stroke. In: Clinical Rehabilitation. 2006 ; Vol. 20, No. 3. pp. 246-253.
@article{94bc53959ad344fc81354261d46afd87,
title = "Implicit learning of a motor skill after mild and moderate stroke",
abstract = "Objective: To determine if adults in the subacute phase post moderate or mild stroke could learn a motor task under implicit practice conditions. Design: Non-randomized, between-group design. Setting: Subjects' homes. Subjects: Sample of convenience of 15 adults with moderate stroke, 22 adults with mild stroke, and 32 age-matched controls. Stroke severity was determined using the Orpington Prognostic Scale. Intervention: Practice of movements to target switches in two conditions, a repeated series and a random series. Practice was organized into a single session of six blocks of 80 trials such that blocks 1 and 2 were the random series, blocks 3 and 4 the repeated series, block 5 the random series, and block 6 the repeated series. Explicit knowledge of the two conditions was not provided. Main measure s: The mean response time and the coefficient of variation were calculated for each block for each group. Results: Regardless of group, participants had a slower response time when practice was unexpectedly switched from the repeated to random condition. The response time and coefficient of variation for those with moderate stroke were persistently greater than those with mild stroke and controls, who were not different from each other. Conclusions: Implicit motor learning is preserved in adults with moderate stroke and may be a viable strategy for teaching motor skills in rehabilitation. The clinician should be aware that subjects with moderate stroke, even when performing with the less affected upper extremity, have significantly slower and more variable movements than those with mild stroke and controls.",
author = "Pohl, {Patricia S.} and McDowd, {J. M.} and D. Filion and Richards, {L. G.} and William Stiers",
year = "2006",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1191/0269215506cr916oa",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "246--253",
journal = "Clinical Rehabilitation",
issn = "0269-2155",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Implicit learning of a motor skill after mild and moderate stroke

AU - Pohl, Patricia S.

AU - McDowd, J. M.

AU - Filion, D.

AU - Richards, L. G.

AU - Stiers, William

PY - 2006/3

Y1 - 2006/3

N2 - Objective: To determine if adults in the subacute phase post moderate or mild stroke could learn a motor task under implicit practice conditions. Design: Non-randomized, between-group design. Setting: Subjects' homes. Subjects: Sample of convenience of 15 adults with moderate stroke, 22 adults with mild stroke, and 32 age-matched controls. Stroke severity was determined using the Orpington Prognostic Scale. Intervention: Practice of movements to target switches in two conditions, a repeated series and a random series. Practice was organized into a single session of six blocks of 80 trials such that blocks 1 and 2 were the random series, blocks 3 and 4 the repeated series, block 5 the random series, and block 6 the repeated series. Explicit knowledge of the two conditions was not provided. Main measure s: The mean response time and the coefficient of variation were calculated for each block for each group. Results: Regardless of group, participants had a slower response time when practice was unexpectedly switched from the repeated to random condition. The response time and coefficient of variation for those with moderate stroke were persistently greater than those with mild stroke and controls, who were not different from each other. Conclusions: Implicit motor learning is preserved in adults with moderate stroke and may be a viable strategy for teaching motor skills in rehabilitation. The clinician should be aware that subjects with moderate stroke, even when performing with the less affected upper extremity, have significantly slower and more variable movements than those with mild stroke and controls.

AB - Objective: To determine if adults in the subacute phase post moderate or mild stroke could learn a motor task under implicit practice conditions. Design: Non-randomized, between-group design. Setting: Subjects' homes. Subjects: Sample of convenience of 15 adults with moderate stroke, 22 adults with mild stroke, and 32 age-matched controls. Stroke severity was determined using the Orpington Prognostic Scale. Intervention: Practice of movements to target switches in two conditions, a repeated series and a random series. Practice was organized into a single session of six blocks of 80 trials such that blocks 1 and 2 were the random series, blocks 3 and 4 the repeated series, block 5 the random series, and block 6 the repeated series. Explicit knowledge of the two conditions was not provided. Main measure s: The mean response time and the coefficient of variation were calculated for each block for each group. Results: Regardless of group, participants had a slower response time when practice was unexpectedly switched from the repeated to random condition. The response time and coefficient of variation for those with moderate stroke were persistently greater than those with mild stroke and controls, who were not different from each other. Conclusions: Implicit motor learning is preserved in adults with moderate stroke and may be a viable strategy for teaching motor skills in rehabilitation. The clinician should be aware that subjects with moderate stroke, even when performing with the less affected upper extremity, have significantly slower and more variable movements than those with mild stroke and controls.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33645817495&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33645817495&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1191/0269215506cr916oa

DO - 10.1191/0269215506cr916oa

M3 - Article

C2 - 16634344

AN - SCOPUS:33645817495

VL - 20

SP - 246

EP - 253

JO - Clinical Rehabilitation

JF - Clinical Rehabilitation

SN - 0269-2155

IS - 3

ER -