Implementing Trauma-Informed Partner Violence Assessment in Family Planning Clinics

Michele R Decker, Sarah Flessa, Ruchita V. Pillai, Rebecca N. Dick, Jamie Quam, Diana Cheng, Raegan McDonald-Mosley, Kamila A Alexander, Charvonne N Holliday, Elizabeth Miller

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Intimate partner violence (IPV) and reproductive coercion (RC) are associated with poor reproductive health. Little is known about how family planning clinics implement brief IPV/RC assessment interventions in practice. We describe the uptake and impact of a brief, trauma-informed, universal IPV/RC assessment and education intervention.

METHODS: Intervention implementation was evaluated via a mixed methods study among women ages 18 and up receiving care at one of two family planning clinics in greater Baltimore, MD. This mixed methods study entailed a quasi-experimental, single group pretest-posttest study with family planning clinic patients (baseline and exit survey n = 132; 3-month retention n = 68; retention rate = 52%), coupled with qualitative interviews with providers and patients (total n = 35).

CONCLUSION: In real-world family planning clinic settings, a brief assessment and support intervention was successful in communicating provider caring and increasing knowledge of violence-related resources, endpoints previously deemed valuable by IPV survivors. Results emphasize the merit of universal education in IPV/RC clinical interventions over seeking IPV disclosure.

RESULTS: Two thirds (65%) of women reported receiving at least one element of the intervention on their exit survey immediately following the clinic-visit. Patients reported that clinic-based IPV assessment is helpful, irrespective of IPV history. Relative to those who reported neither, participants who received either intervention element reported greater perceived caring from providers, confidence in provider response to abusive relationships, and knowledge of IPV-related resources at follow-up. Providers and patients alike described the educational card as a valuable tool. Participants described trade-offs of paper versus in-person, electronic medical record-facilitated screening, and patient reluctance to disclose current situations of abuse.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)957-965
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of women's health (2002)
Volume26
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2017

Fingerprint

Family Planning Services
Violence
Coercion
Wounds and Injuries
Education
Intimate Partner Violence
Baltimore
Electronic Health Records
Reproductive Health
Disclosure
Ambulatory Care
Survivors
History
Interviews

Keywords

  • clinical intervention
  • implementation science
  • intimate partner violence
  • reproductive coercion
  • screening
  • trauma-informed care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Implementing Trauma-Informed Partner Violence Assessment in Family Planning Clinics. / Decker, Michele R; Flessa, Sarah; Pillai, Ruchita V.; Dick, Rebecca N.; Quam, Jamie; Cheng, Diana; McDonald-Mosley, Raegan; Alexander, Kamila A; Holliday, Charvonne N; Miller, Elizabeth.

In: Journal of women's health (2002), Vol. 26, No. 9, 01.09.2017, p. 957-965.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Decker, Michele R ; Flessa, Sarah ; Pillai, Ruchita V. ; Dick, Rebecca N. ; Quam, Jamie ; Cheng, Diana ; McDonald-Mosley, Raegan ; Alexander, Kamila A ; Holliday, Charvonne N ; Miller, Elizabeth. / Implementing Trauma-Informed Partner Violence Assessment in Family Planning Clinics. In: Journal of women's health (2002). 2017 ; Vol. 26, No. 9. pp. 957-965.
@article{3da838d68c4f40a2be6021cc7e9b4b38,
title = "Implementing Trauma-Informed Partner Violence Assessment in Family Planning Clinics",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: Intimate partner violence (IPV) and reproductive coercion (RC) are associated with poor reproductive health. Little is known about how family planning clinics implement brief IPV/RC assessment interventions in practice. We describe the uptake and impact of a brief, trauma-informed, universal IPV/RC assessment and education intervention.METHODS: Intervention implementation was evaluated via a mixed methods study among women ages 18 and up receiving care at one of two family planning clinics in greater Baltimore, MD. This mixed methods study entailed a quasi-experimental, single group pretest-posttest study with family planning clinic patients (baseline and exit survey n = 132; 3-month retention n = 68; retention rate = 52{\%}), coupled with qualitative interviews with providers and patients (total n = 35).CONCLUSION: In real-world family planning clinic settings, a brief assessment and support intervention was successful in communicating provider caring and increasing knowledge of violence-related resources, endpoints previously deemed valuable by IPV survivors. Results emphasize the merit of universal education in IPV/RC clinical interventions over seeking IPV disclosure.RESULTS: Two thirds (65{\%}) of women reported receiving at least one element of the intervention on their exit survey immediately following the clinic-visit. Patients reported that clinic-based IPV assessment is helpful, irrespective of IPV history. Relative to those who reported neither, participants who received either intervention element reported greater perceived caring from providers, confidence in provider response to abusive relationships, and knowledge of IPV-related resources at follow-up. Providers and patients alike described the educational card as a valuable tool. Participants described trade-offs of paper versus in-person, electronic medical record-facilitated screening, and patient reluctance to disclose current situations of abuse.",
keywords = "clinical intervention, implementation science, intimate partner violence, reproductive coercion, screening, trauma-informed care",
author = "Decker, {Michele R} and Sarah Flessa and Pillai, {Ruchita V.} and Dick, {Rebecca N.} and Jamie Quam and Diana Cheng and Raegan McDonald-Mosley and Alexander, {Kamila A} and Holliday, {Charvonne N} and Elizabeth Miller",
year = "2017",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1089/jwh.2016.6093",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "957--965",
journal = "Journal of Women's Health",
issn = "1540-9996",
publisher = "Mary Ann Liebert Inc.",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Implementing Trauma-Informed Partner Violence Assessment in Family Planning Clinics

AU - Decker, Michele R

AU - Flessa, Sarah

AU - Pillai, Ruchita V.

AU - Dick, Rebecca N.

AU - Quam, Jamie

AU - Cheng, Diana

AU - McDonald-Mosley, Raegan

AU - Alexander, Kamila A

AU - Holliday, Charvonne N

AU - Miller, Elizabeth

PY - 2017/9/1

Y1 - 2017/9/1

N2 - OBJECTIVE: Intimate partner violence (IPV) and reproductive coercion (RC) are associated with poor reproductive health. Little is known about how family planning clinics implement brief IPV/RC assessment interventions in practice. We describe the uptake and impact of a brief, trauma-informed, universal IPV/RC assessment and education intervention.METHODS: Intervention implementation was evaluated via a mixed methods study among women ages 18 and up receiving care at one of two family planning clinics in greater Baltimore, MD. This mixed methods study entailed a quasi-experimental, single group pretest-posttest study with family planning clinic patients (baseline and exit survey n = 132; 3-month retention n = 68; retention rate = 52%), coupled with qualitative interviews with providers and patients (total n = 35).CONCLUSION: In real-world family planning clinic settings, a brief assessment and support intervention was successful in communicating provider caring and increasing knowledge of violence-related resources, endpoints previously deemed valuable by IPV survivors. Results emphasize the merit of universal education in IPV/RC clinical interventions over seeking IPV disclosure.RESULTS: Two thirds (65%) of women reported receiving at least one element of the intervention on their exit survey immediately following the clinic-visit. Patients reported that clinic-based IPV assessment is helpful, irrespective of IPV history. Relative to those who reported neither, participants who received either intervention element reported greater perceived caring from providers, confidence in provider response to abusive relationships, and knowledge of IPV-related resources at follow-up. Providers and patients alike described the educational card as a valuable tool. Participants described trade-offs of paper versus in-person, electronic medical record-facilitated screening, and patient reluctance to disclose current situations of abuse.

AB - OBJECTIVE: Intimate partner violence (IPV) and reproductive coercion (RC) are associated with poor reproductive health. Little is known about how family planning clinics implement brief IPV/RC assessment interventions in practice. We describe the uptake and impact of a brief, trauma-informed, universal IPV/RC assessment and education intervention.METHODS: Intervention implementation was evaluated via a mixed methods study among women ages 18 and up receiving care at one of two family planning clinics in greater Baltimore, MD. This mixed methods study entailed a quasi-experimental, single group pretest-posttest study with family planning clinic patients (baseline and exit survey n = 132; 3-month retention n = 68; retention rate = 52%), coupled with qualitative interviews with providers and patients (total n = 35).CONCLUSION: In real-world family planning clinic settings, a brief assessment and support intervention was successful in communicating provider caring and increasing knowledge of violence-related resources, endpoints previously deemed valuable by IPV survivors. Results emphasize the merit of universal education in IPV/RC clinical interventions over seeking IPV disclosure.RESULTS: Two thirds (65%) of women reported receiving at least one element of the intervention on their exit survey immediately following the clinic-visit. Patients reported that clinic-based IPV assessment is helpful, irrespective of IPV history. Relative to those who reported neither, participants who received either intervention element reported greater perceived caring from providers, confidence in provider response to abusive relationships, and knowledge of IPV-related resources at follow-up. Providers and patients alike described the educational card as a valuable tool. Participants described trade-offs of paper versus in-person, electronic medical record-facilitated screening, and patient reluctance to disclose current situations of abuse.

KW - clinical intervention

KW - implementation science

KW - intimate partner violence

KW - reproductive coercion

KW - screening

KW - trauma-informed care

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85026638679&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85026638679&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1089/jwh.2016.6093

DO - 10.1089/jwh.2016.6093

M3 - Article

C2 - 28375750

AN - SCOPUS:85026638679

VL - 26

SP - 957

EP - 965

JO - Journal of Women's Health

JF - Journal of Women's Health

SN - 1540-9996

IS - 9

ER -