Implementing standardized, inter-unit communication in an international setting

handoff of patients from emergency medicine to internal medicine

Kamna Balhara, Susan Peterson, Mohamed Moheb Elabd, Linda Regan, Xavier Anton, Basil Ali Al-Natour, Yu-Hsiang Hsieh, James Scheulen, Sarah A. Stewart de Ramirez

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Standardized handoffs may reduce communication errors, but research on handoff in community and international settings is lacking. Our study at a community hospital in the United Arab Emirates characterizes existing handoff practices for admitted patients from emergency medicine (EM) to internal medicine (IM), develops a standardized handoff tool, and assesses its impact on communication and physician perceptions. EM physicians completed a survey regarding handoff practices and expectations. Trained observers utilized a checklist based on the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety model to observe 40 handoffs. EM and IM physicians collaboratively developed a written tool encouraging bedside handoff of admitted patients. After the intervention, surveys of EM physicians and 40 observations were subsequently repeated. 77.5% of initial observed handoffs occurred face-to-face, with 42.5% at bedside, and in four different languages. Most survey respondents considered face-to-face handoff ideal. Respondents noted 9–13 patients suffering harm due to handoff in the prior month. After handoff tool implementation, 97.5% of observed handoffs occurred face-to-face (versus 77.5%, p = 0.014), with 82.5% at bedside (versus 42.5%, p < 0.001), and all in English. Handoff was streamlined from 7 possible pathways to 3. Most post-intervention survey respondents reported improved workflow (77.8%) and safety (83.3%); none reported patient harm. Respondents and observers noted reduced inefficiency (p < 0.05). Our standardized tool increased face-to-face and bedside handoff, positively impacted workflow, and increased perceptions of safety by EM physicians in an international, non-academic setting. Our three-step approach can be applied towards developing standardized, context-specific inter-specialty handoff in a variety of settings.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-11
Number of pages11
JournalInternal and Emergency Medicine
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Feb 3 2017

Fingerprint

Patient Handoff
Emergency Medicine
Internal Medicine
Communication
Physicians
Patient Harm
Workflow
United Arab Emirates
Safety
Surveys and Questionnaires
Community Hospital
Patient Safety
Checklist
Language

Keywords

  • Clinical handoff
  • Emergency service, hospital
  • Inter-unit communication
  • Patient admission

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine
  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

Implementing standardized, inter-unit communication in an international setting : handoff of patients from emergency medicine to internal medicine. / Balhara, Kamna; Peterson, Susan; Elabd, Mohamed Moheb; Regan, Linda; Anton, Xavier; Al-Natour, Basil Ali; Hsieh, Yu-Hsiang; Scheulen, James; Stewart de Ramirez, Sarah A.

In: Internal and Emergency Medicine, 03.02.2017, p. 1-11.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{aa9fefd830f24d95b6d2efbfb0244262,
title = "Implementing standardized, inter-unit communication in an international setting: handoff of patients from emergency medicine to internal medicine",
abstract = "Standardized handoffs may reduce communication errors, but research on handoff in community and international settings is lacking. Our study at a community hospital in the United Arab Emirates characterizes existing handoff practices for admitted patients from emergency medicine (EM) to internal medicine (IM), develops a standardized handoff tool, and assesses its impact on communication and physician perceptions. EM physicians completed a survey regarding handoff practices and expectations. Trained observers utilized a checklist based on the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety model to observe 40 handoffs. EM and IM physicians collaboratively developed a written tool encouraging bedside handoff of admitted patients. After the intervention, surveys of EM physicians and 40 observations were subsequently repeated. 77.5{\%} of initial observed handoffs occurred face-to-face, with 42.5{\%} at bedside, and in four different languages. Most survey respondents considered face-to-face handoff ideal. Respondents noted 9–13 patients suffering harm due to handoff in the prior month. After handoff tool implementation, 97.5{\%} of observed handoffs occurred face-to-face (versus 77.5{\%}, p = 0.014), with 82.5{\%} at bedside (versus 42.5{\%}, p < 0.001), and all in English. Handoff was streamlined from 7 possible pathways to 3. Most post-intervention survey respondents reported improved workflow (77.8{\%}) and safety (83.3{\%}); none reported patient harm. Respondents and observers noted reduced inefficiency (p < 0.05). Our standardized tool increased face-to-face and bedside handoff, positively impacted workflow, and increased perceptions of safety by EM physicians in an international, non-academic setting. Our three-step approach can be applied towards developing standardized, context-specific inter-specialty handoff in a variety of settings.",
keywords = "Clinical handoff, Emergency service, hospital, Inter-unit communication, Patient admission",
author = "Kamna Balhara and Susan Peterson and Elabd, {Mohamed Moheb} and Linda Regan and Xavier Anton and Al-Natour, {Basil Ali} and Yu-Hsiang Hsieh and James Scheulen and {Stewart de Ramirez}, {Sarah A.}",
year = "2017",
month = "2",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1007/s11739-017-1615-y",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "1--11",
journal = "Internal and Emergency Medicine",
issn = "1828-0447",
publisher = "Springer-Verlag Italia",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Implementing standardized, inter-unit communication in an international setting

T2 - handoff of patients from emergency medicine to internal medicine

AU - Balhara, Kamna

AU - Peterson, Susan

AU - Elabd, Mohamed Moheb

AU - Regan, Linda

AU - Anton, Xavier

AU - Al-Natour, Basil Ali

AU - Hsieh, Yu-Hsiang

AU - Scheulen, James

AU - Stewart de Ramirez, Sarah A.

PY - 2017/2/3

Y1 - 2017/2/3

N2 - Standardized handoffs may reduce communication errors, but research on handoff in community and international settings is lacking. Our study at a community hospital in the United Arab Emirates characterizes existing handoff practices for admitted patients from emergency medicine (EM) to internal medicine (IM), develops a standardized handoff tool, and assesses its impact on communication and physician perceptions. EM physicians completed a survey regarding handoff practices and expectations. Trained observers utilized a checklist based on the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety model to observe 40 handoffs. EM and IM physicians collaboratively developed a written tool encouraging bedside handoff of admitted patients. After the intervention, surveys of EM physicians and 40 observations were subsequently repeated. 77.5% of initial observed handoffs occurred face-to-face, with 42.5% at bedside, and in four different languages. Most survey respondents considered face-to-face handoff ideal. Respondents noted 9–13 patients suffering harm due to handoff in the prior month. After handoff tool implementation, 97.5% of observed handoffs occurred face-to-face (versus 77.5%, p = 0.014), with 82.5% at bedside (versus 42.5%, p < 0.001), and all in English. Handoff was streamlined from 7 possible pathways to 3. Most post-intervention survey respondents reported improved workflow (77.8%) and safety (83.3%); none reported patient harm. Respondents and observers noted reduced inefficiency (p < 0.05). Our standardized tool increased face-to-face and bedside handoff, positively impacted workflow, and increased perceptions of safety by EM physicians in an international, non-academic setting. Our three-step approach can be applied towards developing standardized, context-specific inter-specialty handoff in a variety of settings.

AB - Standardized handoffs may reduce communication errors, but research on handoff in community and international settings is lacking. Our study at a community hospital in the United Arab Emirates characterizes existing handoff practices for admitted patients from emergency medicine (EM) to internal medicine (IM), develops a standardized handoff tool, and assesses its impact on communication and physician perceptions. EM physicians completed a survey regarding handoff practices and expectations. Trained observers utilized a checklist based on the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety model to observe 40 handoffs. EM and IM physicians collaboratively developed a written tool encouraging bedside handoff of admitted patients. After the intervention, surveys of EM physicians and 40 observations were subsequently repeated. 77.5% of initial observed handoffs occurred face-to-face, with 42.5% at bedside, and in four different languages. Most survey respondents considered face-to-face handoff ideal. Respondents noted 9–13 patients suffering harm due to handoff in the prior month. After handoff tool implementation, 97.5% of observed handoffs occurred face-to-face (versus 77.5%, p = 0.014), with 82.5% at bedside (versus 42.5%, p < 0.001), and all in English. Handoff was streamlined from 7 possible pathways to 3. Most post-intervention survey respondents reported improved workflow (77.8%) and safety (83.3%); none reported patient harm. Respondents and observers noted reduced inefficiency (p < 0.05). Our standardized tool increased face-to-face and bedside handoff, positively impacted workflow, and increased perceptions of safety by EM physicians in an international, non-academic setting. Our three-step approach can be applied towards developing standardized, context-specific inter-specialty handoff in a variety of settings.

KW - Clinical handoff

KW - Emergency service, hospital

KW - Inter-unit communication

KW - Patient admission

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85011710555&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85011710555&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11739-017-1615-y

DO - 10.1007/s11739-017-1615-y

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 11

JO - Internal and Emergency Medicine

JF - Internal and Emergency Medicine

SN - 1828-0447

ER -