Implementation strategies to reduce surgical site infections: A systematic review

Promise Ariyo, Bassem Zayed, Victoria Riese, Blair Anton, Asad Latif, Claire Kilpatrick, Benedetta Allegranzi, Sean Berenholtz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background:Surgical site infections (SSIs) portend high patient morbidity and mortality. Although evidence-based clinical interventions can reduce SSIs, they are not reliably delivered in practice, and data are limited on the best approach to improve adherence.Objective:To summarize implementation strategies aimed at improving adherence to evidence-based interventions that reduce SSIs.Design:Systematic reviewMethods:We searched PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, the Cochrane Library, the WHO Regional databases, AFROLIB, and Africa-Wide for studies published between January 1990 and December 2015. The Effective Practice and Organization Care (EPOC) criteria were used to identify an acceptable-quality study design. We used structured forms to extract data on implementation strategies and grouped them into an implementation model called the "Four Es" framework (ie, engage, educate, execute, and evaluate).Results:In total, 125 studies met our inclusion criteria, but only 8 studies met the EPOC criteria, which limited our ability to identify best practices. Most studies used multifaceted strategies to improve adherence with evidence-based interventions. Engagement strategies included multidisciplinary work and strong leadership involvement. Education strategies included various approaches to introduce evidence-based practices to clinicians and patients. Execution strategies standardized the interventions into simple tasks to facilitate uptake. Evaluation strategies assessed adherence with evidence-based interventions and patient outcomes, providing feedback of performance to providers.Conclusions:Multifaceted implementation strategies represent the most common approach to facilitating the adoption of evidence-based practices. We believe that this summary of implementation strategies complements existing clinical guidelines and may accelerate efforts to reduce SSIs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalInfection control and hospital epidemiology
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Surgical Wound Infection
Evidence-Based Practice
Organizations
Aptitude
Practice Guidelines
PubMed
Libraries
Databases
Guidelines
Morbidity
Education
Mortality

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology
  • Microbiology (medical)
  • Infectious Diseases

Cite this

Implementation strategies to reduce surgical site infections : A systematic review. / Ariyo, Promise; Zayed, Bassem; Riese, Victoria; Anton, Blair; Latif, Asad; Kilpatrick, Claire; Allegranzi, Benedetta; Berenholtz, Sean.

In: Infection control and hospital epidemiology, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ab6b8612e2b24b768968fcf9cca7cfd0,
title = "Implementation strategies to reduce surgical site infections: A systematic review",
abstract = "Background:Surgical site infections (SSIs) portend high patient morbidity and mortality. Although evidence-based clinical interventions can reduce SSIs, they are not reliably delivered in practice, and data are limited on the best approach to improve adherence.Objective:To summarize implementation strategies aimed at improving adherence to evidence-based interventions that reduce SSIs.Design:Systematic reviewMethods:We searched PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, the Cochrane Library, the WHO Regional databases, AFROLIB, and Africa-Wide for studies published between January 1990 and December 2015. The Effective Practice and Organization Care (EPOC) criteria were used to identify an acceptable-quality study design. We used structured forms to extract data on implementation strategies and grouped them into an implementation model called the {"}Four Es{"} framework (ie, engage, educate, execute, and evaluate).Results:In total, 125 studies met our inclusion criteria, but only 8 studies met the EPOC criteria, which limited our ability to identify best practices. Most studies used multifaceted strategies to improve adherence with evidence-based interventions. Engagement strategies included multidisciplinary work and strong leadership involvement. Education strategies included various approaches to introduce evidence-based practices to clinicians and patients. Execution strategies standardized the interventions into simple tasks to facilitate uptake. Evaluation strategies assessed adherence with evidence-based interventions and patient outcomes, providing feedback of performance to providers.Conclusions:Multifaceted implementation strategies represent the most common approach to facilitating the adoption of evidence-based practices. We believe that this summary of implementation strategies complements existing clinical guidelines and may accelerate efforts to reduce SSIs.",
author = "Promise Ariyo and Bassem Zayed and Victoria Riese and Blair Anton and Asad Latif and Claire Kilpatrick and Benedetta Allegranzi and Sean Berenholtz",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/ice.2018.355",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology",
issn = "0899-823X",
publisher = "University of Chicago Press",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Implementation strategies to reduce surgical site infections

T2 - A systematic review

AU - Ariyo, Promise

AU - Zayed, Bassem

AU - Riese, Victoria

AU - Anton, Blair

AU - Latif, Asad

AU - Kilpatrick, Claire

AU - Allegranzi, Benedetta

AU - Berenholtz, Sean

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Background:Surgical site infections (SSIs) portend high patient morbidity and mortality. Although evidence-based clinical interventions can reduce SSIs, they are not reliably delivered in practice, and data are limited on the best approach to improve adherence.Objective:To summarize implementation strategies aimed at improving adherence to evidence-based interventions that reduce SSIs.Design:Systematic reviewMethods:We searched PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, the Cochrane Library, the WHO Regional databases, AFROLIB, and Africa-Wide for studies published between January 1990 and December 2015. The Effective Practice and Organization Care (EPOC) criteria were used to identify an acceptable-quality study design. We used structured forms to extract data on implementation strategies and grouped them into an implementation model called the "Four Es" framework (ie, engage, educate, execute, and evaluate).Results:In total, 125 studies met our inclusion criteria, but only 8 studies met the EPOC criteria, which limited our ability to identify best practices. Most studies used multifaceted strategies to improve adherence with evidence-based interventions. Engagement strategies included multidisciplinary work and strong leadership involvement. Education strategies included various approaches to introduce evidence-based practices to clinicians and patients. Execution strategies standardized the interventions into simple tasks to facilitate uptake. Evaluation strategies assessed adherence with evidence-based interventions and patient outcomes, providing feedback of performance to providers.Conclusions:Multifaceted implementation strategies represent the most common approach to facilitating the adoption of evidence-based practices. We believe that this summary of implementation strategies complements existing clinical guidelines and may accelerate efforts to reduce SSIs.

AB - Background:Surgical site infections (SSIs) portend high patient morbidity and mortality. Although evidence-based clinical interventions can reduce SSIs, they are not reliably delivered in practice, and data are limited on the best approach to improve adherence.Objective:To summarize implementation strategies aimed at improving adherence to evidence-based interventions that reduce SSIs.Design:Systematic reviewMethods:We searched PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, the Cochrane Library, the WHO Regional databases, AFROLIB, and Africa-Wide for studies published between January 1990 and December 2015. The Effective Practice and Organization Care (EPOC) criteria were used to identify an acceptable-quality study design. We used structured forms to extract data on implementation strategies and grouped them into an implementation model called the "Four Es" framework (ie, engage, educate, execute, and evaluate).Results:In total, 125 studies met our inclusion criteria, but only 8 studies met the EPOC criteria, which limited our ability to identify best practices. Most studies used multifaceted strategies to improve adherence with evidence-based interventions. Engagement strategies included multidisciplinary work and strong leadership involvement. Education strategies included various approaches to introduce evidence-based practices to clinicians and patients. Execution strategies standardized the interventions into simple tasks to facilitate uptake. Evaluation strategies assessed adherence with evidence-based interventions and patient outcomes, providing feedback of performance to providers.Conclusions:Multifaceted implementation strategies represent the most common approach to facilitating the adoption of evidence-based practices. We believe that this summary of implementation strategies complements existing clinical guidelines and may accelerate efforts to reduce SSIs.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061963537&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85061963537&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/ice.2018.355

DO - 10.1017/ice.2018.355

M3 - Article

C2 - 30786946

AN - SCOPUS:85061963537

JO - Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology

JF - Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology

SN - 0899-823X

ER -