Implementation of an enhanced recovery program for bariatric surgery

James Taylor, Joseph Canner, Carol Cronauer, Daniel Prior, Alisa Coker, Hien Nguyen, Thomas Magnuson, Gina Adrales, Michael Schweitzer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Introduction: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs have been successfully implemented in several surgical fields; however, there have been mixed results observed in bariatric surgery. Our institution implemented an enhanced recovery program with specific pre-, intra-, and post-operative protocols aimed at patients, nursing staff, and physicians. The aim of the study is to assess the effectiveness of the ERAS program. Methods: Patients who underwent bariatric surgery prior to the implementation of the enhanced recovery program in the calendar year 2015 were compared to those who had surgery after implementation in 2017. Data for our institution was drawn from the Premier Hospital Database. Poisson and quantile regressions were used to examine the association between ERAS protocol and LOS and cost, respectively. Logistic regression was used to assess the impact of ERAS on 30-day complications and readmissions. Results: 277 bariatric surgical procedures were performed in the pre-ERAS group, compared to 348 procedures post-ERAS. While there was a 25.6% increase in volume, there was no statistical difference between the patient populations or the type of procedure performed between the 2 years. A decrease in length of stay was observed from 2.77 days in 2015 to 1.77 days in 2017 (p < 0.001), while median cost was also cut from $11,739.03 to $9482.18 (p < 0.001). 30-day readmission rate also decreased from 7.94% to 2.86% (p = 0.011). After controlling for other factors, ERAS protocol was associated with decreased LOS (IRR 0.65, p < 0.001), cost (− $2256.88, p < 0.001), and risk of 30-day readmission (OR 0.37, p = 0.011). Conclusion: The implementation of a standardized enhanced recovery program resulted in reduced length of stay, cost, and 30-day readmissions. Total costs saved were greater than $800,000 in one calendar year. This study highlights that the value of an enhanced recovery program can be observed in bariatric surgery, benefiting both patients and hospital systems. Graphic abstract: [Figure not available: see fulltext.].

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalSurgical endoscopy
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Bariatric Surgery
Costs and Cost Analysis
Length of Stay
Nursing Staff
Logistic Models
Databases
Physicians

Keywords

  • Bariatric surgery
  • Enhanced recovery after bariatric surgery
  • Enhanced recovery after surgery
  • ERABS
  • ERAS

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Implementation of an enhanced recovery program for bariatric surgery. / Taylor, James; Canner, Joseph; Cronauer, Carol; Prior, Daniel; Coker, Alisa; Nguyen, Hien; Magnuson, Thomas; Adrales, Gina; Schweitzer, Michael.

In: Surgical endoscopy, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{61f6538b6db5441696bc2fb7f2d8576b,
title = "Implementation of an enhanced recovery program for bariatric surgery",
abstract = "Introduction: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs have been successfully implemented in several surgical fields; however, there have been mixed results observed in bariatric surgery. Our institution implemented an enhanced recovery program with specific pre-, intra-, and post-operative protocols aimed at patients, nursing staff, and physicians. The aim of the study is to assess the effectiveness of the ERAS program. Methods: Patients who underwent bariatric surgery prior to the implementation of the enhanced recovery program in the calendar year 2015 were compared to those who had surgery after implementation in 2017. Data for our institution was drawn from the Premier Hospital Database. Poisson and quantile regressions were used to examine the association between ERAS protocol and LOS and cost, respectively. Logistic regression was used to assess the impact of ERAS on 30-day complications and readmissions. Results: 277 bariatric surgical procedures were performed in the pre-ERAS group, compared to 348 procedures post-ERAS. While there was a 25.6{\%} increase in volume, there was no statistical difference between the patient populations or the type of procedure performed between the 2 years. A decrease in length of stay was observed from 2.77 days in 2015 to 1.77 days in 2017 (p < 0.001), while median cost was also cut from $11,739.03 to $9482.18 (p < 0.001). 30-day readmission rate also decreased from 7.94{\%} to 2.86{\%} (p = 0.011). After controlling for other factors, ERAS protocol was associated with decreased LOS (IRR 0.65, p < 0.001), cost (− $2256.88, p < 0.001), and risk of 30-day readmission (OR 0.37, p = 0.011). Conclusion: The implementation of a standardized enhanced recovery program resulted in reduced length of stay, cost, and 30-day readmissions. Total costs saved were greater than $800,000 in one calendar year. This study highlights that the value of an enhanced recovery program can be observed in bariatric surgery, benefiting both patients and hospital systems. Graphic abstract: [Figure not available: see fulltext.].",
keywords = "Bariatric surgery, Enhanced recovery after bariatric surgery, Enhanced recovery after surgery, ERABS, ERAS",
author = "James Taylor and Joseph Canner and Carol Cronauer and Daniel Prior and Alisa Coker and Hien Nguyen and Thomas Magnuson and Gina Adrales and Michael Schweitzer",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s00464-019-07045-w",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Surgical Endoscopy",
issn = "0930-2794",
publisher = "Springer New York",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Implementation of an enhanced recovery program for bariatric surgery

AU - Taylor, James

AU - Canner, Joseph

AU - Cronauer, Carol

AU - Prior, Daniel

AU - Coker, Alisa

AU - Nguyen, Hien

AU - Magnuson, Thomas

AU - Adrales, Gina

AU - Schweitzer, Michael

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Introduction: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs have been successfully implemented in several surgical fields; however, there have been mixed results observed in bariatric surgery. Our institution implemented an enhanced recovery program with specific pre-, intra-, and post-operative protocols aimed at patients, nursing staff, and physicians. The aim of the study is to assess the effectiveness of the ERAS program. Methods: Patients who underwent bariatric surgery prior to the implementation of the enhanced recovery program in the calendar year 2015 were compared to those who had surgery after implementation in 2017. Data for our institution was drawn from the Premier Hospital Database. Poisson and quantile regressions were used to examine the association between ERAS protocol and LOS and cost, respectively. Logistic regression was used to assess the impact of ERAS on 30-day complications and readmissions. Results: 277 bariatric surgical procedures were performed in the pre-ERAS group, compared to 348 procedures post-ERAS. While there was a 25.6% increase in volume, there was no statistical difference between the patient populations or the type of procedure performed between the 2 years. A decrease in length of stay was observed from 2.77 days in 2015 to 1.77 days in 2017 (p < 0.001), while median cost was also cut from $11,739.03 to $9482.18 (p < 0.001). 30-day readmission rate also decreased from 7.94% to 2.86% (p = 0.011). After controlling for other factors, ERAS protocol was associated with decreased LOS (IRR 0.65, p < 0.001), cost (− $2256.88, p < 0.001), and risk of 30-day readmission (OR 0.37, p = 0.011). Conclusion: The implementation of a standardized enhanced recovery program resulted in reduced length of stay, cost, and 30-day readmissions. Total costs saved were greater than $800,000 in one calendar year. This study highlights that the value of an enhanced recovery program can be observed in bariatric surgery, benefiting both patients and hospital systems. Graphic abstract: [Figure not available: see fulltext.].

AB - Introduction: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs have been successfully implemented in several surgical fields; however, there have been mixed results observed in bariatric surgery. Our institution implemented an enhanced recovery program with specific pre-, intra-, and post-operative protocols aimed at patients, nursing staff, and physicians. The aim of the study is to assess the effectiveness of the ERAS program. Methods: Patients who underwent bariatric surgery prior to the implementation of the enhanced recovery program in the calendar year 2015 were compared to those who had surgery after implementation in 2017. Data for our institution was drawn from the Premier Hospital Database. Poisson and quantile regressions were used to examine the association between ERAS protocol and LOS and cost, respectively. Logistic regression was used to assess the impact of ERAS on 30-day complications and readmissions. Results: 277 bariatric surgical procedures were performed in the pre-ERAS group, compared to 348 procedures post-ERAS. While there was a 25.6% increase in volume, there was no statistical difference between the patient populations or the type of procedure performed between the 2 years. A decrease in length of stay was observed from 2.77 days in 2015 to 1.77 days in 2017 (p < 0.001), while median cost was also cut from $11,739.03 to $9482.18 (p < 0.001). 30-day readmission rate also decreased from 7.94% to 2.86% (p = 0.011). After controlling for other factors, ERAS protocol was associated with decreased LOS (IRR 0.65, p < 0.001), cost (− $2256.88, p < 0.001), and risk of 30-day readmission (OR 0.37, p = 0.011). Conclusion: The implementation of a standardized enhanced recovery program resulted in reduced length of stay, cost, and 30-day readmissions. Total costs saved were greater than $800,000 in one calendar year. This study highlights that the value of an enhanced recovery program can be observed in bariatric surgery, benefiting both patients and hospital systems. Graphic abstract: [Figure not available: see fulltext.].

KW - Bariatric surgery

KW - Enhanced recovery after bariatric surgery

KW - Enhanced recovery after surgery

KW - ERABS

KW - ERAS

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85070080256&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85070080256&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00464-019-07045-w

DO - 10.1007/s00464-019-07045-w

M3 - Article

C2 - 31372891

AN - SCOPUS:85070080256

JO - Surgical Endoscopy

JF - Surgical Endoscopy

SN - 0930-2794

ER -