Implementation of a TORS program in an academic medical center

Jeremy D. Richmon, Nishant Agrawal, Kavita M. Pattani

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objectives: Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) is rapidly being adopted by many head and neck surgeons for treatment of upper aerodigestive tract tumors. Various obstacles exist to efficiently implement this novel surgical technique in a busy academic center. We present our experience to illustrate one approach to initiating a TORS program. Study Design: Prospective cohort study. Methods: A clear, stepwise approach to introduce TORS in our hospital was devised prior to scheduling the first case. Upon initiation of the program, various time points and surgical outcomes were measured for all patients undergoing TORS. Results: The first 20 cases of TORS at Johns Hopkins Hospital are reviewed. Room setup time averaged 24 minutes (±12). Presurgery time averaged 22 ± 10 minutes. Positioning time averaged 38 ± 13 minutes. Operative time (OT) averaged 71 ± 54 minutes. The total time in room (TTR) averaged 242 ± 84 minutes. There were no significant differences (P >.5) in any of the time measurements above between the first and second 10 cases or the first 15 and last 5 cases. Negative margins (both frozen and permanent) were obtained in all ablative cases. No patient required a tracheotomy and no procedure was aborted secondary to inability to expose the tumor. The average hospitalization time was 1.3 days. All patients were discharged on oral diets. There were no long-term surgical complications. Conclusions: The introduction of a TORS program in an academic medical center can be a complex and daunting undertaking. We demonstrate that with careful planning, excellent efficiency and safety can be attained immediately.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2344-2348
Number of pages5
JournalLaryngoscope
Volume121
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2011

Fingerprint

Robotics
Tracheotomy
Operative Time
Neoplasms
Hospitalization
Cohort Studies
Neck
Head
Prospective Studies
Diet
Safety

Keywords

  • new technology
  • oropharyngeal cancer
  • training
  • Transoral robotic surgery

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

Richmon, J. D., Agrawal, N., & Pattani, K. M. (2011). Implementation of a TORS program in an academic medical center. Laryngoscope, 121(11), 2344-2348. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.21750

Implementation of a TORS program in an academic medical center. / Richmon, Jeremy D.; Agrawal, Nishant; Pattani, Kavita M.

In: Laryngoscope, Vol. 121, No. 11, 11.2011, p. 2344-2348.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Richmon, JD, Agrawal, N & Pattani, KM 2011, 'Implementation of a TORS program in an academic medical center', Laryngoscope, vol. 121, no. 11, pp. 2344-2348. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.21750
Richmon, Jeremy D. ; Agrawal, Nishant ; Pattani, Kavita M. / Implementation of a TORS program in an academic medical center. In: Laryngoscope. 2011 ; Vol. 121, No. 11. pp. 2344-2348.
@article{e01328a484b54c7eb4264265335de757,
title = "Implementation of a TORS program in an academic medical center",
abstract = "Objectives: Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) is rapidly being adopted by many head and neck surgeons for treatment of upper aerodigestive tract tumors. Various obstacles exist to efficiently implement this novel surgical technique in a busy academic center. We present our experience to illustrate one approach to initiating a TORS program. Study Design: Prospective cohort study. Methods: A clear, stepwise approach to introduce TORS in our hospital was devised prior to scheduling the first case. Upon initiation of the program, various time points and surgical outcomes were measured for all patients undergoing TORS. Results: The first 20 cases of TORS at Johns Hopkins Hospital are reviewed. Room setup time averaged 24 minutes (±12). Presurgery time averaged 22 ± 10 minutes. Positioning time averaged 38 ± 13 minutes. Operative time (OT) averaged 71 ± 54 minutes. The total time in room (TTR) averaged 242 ± 84 minutes. There were no significant differences (P >.5) in any of the time measurements above between the first and second 10 cases or the first 15 and last 5 cases. Negative margins (both frozen and permanent) were obtained in all ablative cases. No patient required a tracheotomy and no procedure was aborted secondary to inability to expose the tumor. The average hospitalization time was 1.3 days. All patients were discharged on oral diets. There were no long-term surgical complications. Conclusions: The introduction of a TORS program in an academic medical center can be a complex and daunting undertaking. We demonstrate that with careful planning, excellent efficiency and safety can be attained immediately.",
keywords = "new technology, oropharyngeal cancer, training, Transoral robotic surgery",
author = "Richmon, {Jeremy D.} and Nishant Agrawal and Pattani, {Kavita M.}",
year = "2011",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1002/lary.21750",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "121",
pages = "2344--2348",
journal = "Laryngoscope",
issn = "0023-852X",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Implementation of a TORS program in an academic medical center

AU - Richmon, Jeremy D.

AU - Agrawal, Nishant

AU - Pattani, Kavita M.

PY - 2011/11

Y1 - 2011/11

N2 - Objectives: Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) is rapidly being adopted by many head and neck surgeons for treatment of upper aerodigestive tract tumors. Various obstacles exist to efficiently implement this novel surgical technique in a busy academic center. We present our experience to illustrate one approach to initiating a TORS program. Study Design: Prospective cohort study. Methods: A clear, stepwise approach to introduce TORS in our hospital was devised prior to scheduling the first case. Upon initiation of the program, various time points and surgical outcomes were measured for all patients undergoing TORS. Results: The first 20 cases of TORS at Johns Hopkins Hospital are reviewed. Room setup time averaged 24 minutes (±12). Presurgery time averaged 22 ± 10 minutes. Positioning time averaged 38 ± 13 minutes. Operative time (OT) averaged 71 ± 54 minutes. The total time in room (TTR) averaged 242 ± 84 minutes. There were no significant differences (P >.5) in any of the time measurements above between the first and second 10 cases or the first 15 and last 5 cases. Negative margins (both frozen and permanent) were obtained in all ablative cases. No patient required a tracheotomy and no procedure was aborted secondary to inability to expose the tumor. The average hospitalization time was 1.3 days. All patients were discharged on oral diets. There were no long-term surgical complications. Conclusions: The introduction of a TORS program in an academic medical center can be a complex and daunting undertaking. We demonstrate that with careful planning, excellent efficiency and safety can be attained immediately.

AB - Objectives: Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) is rapidly being adopted by many head and neck surgeons for treatment of upper aerodigestive tract tumors. Various obstacles exist to efficiently implement this novel surgical technique in a busy academic center. We present our experience to illustrate one approach to initiating a TORS program. Study Design: Prospective cohort study. Methods: A clear, stepwise approach to introduce TORS in our hospital was devised prior to scheduling the first case. Upon initiation of the program, various time points and surgical outcomes were measured for all patients undergoing TORS. Results: The first 20 cases of TORS at Johns Hopkins Hospital are reviewed. Room setup time averaged 24 minutes (±12). Presurgery time averaged 22 ± 10 minutes. Positioning time averaged 38 ± 13 minutes. Operative time (OT) averaged 71 ± 54 minutes. The total time in room (TTR) averaged 242 ± 84 minutes. There were no significant differences (P >.5) in any of the time measurements above between the first and second 10 cases or the first 15 and last 5 cases. Negative margins (both frozen and permanent) were obtained in all ablative cases. No patient required a tracheotomy and no procedure was aborted secondary to inability to expose the tumor. The average hospitalization time was 1.3 days. All patients were discharged on oral diets. There were no long-term surgical complications. Conclusions: The introduction of a TORS program in an academic medical center can be a complex and daunting undertaking. We demonstrate that with careful planning, excellent efficiency and safety can be attained immediately.

KW - new technology

KW - oropharyngeal cancer

KW - training

KW - Transoral robotic surgery

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80055039967&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80055039967&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/lary.21750

DO - 10.1002/lary.21750

M3 - Article

C2 - 21993984

AN - SCOPUS:80055039967

VL - 121

SP - 2344

EP - 2348

JO - Laryngoscope

JF - Laryngoscope

SN - 0023-852X

IS - 11

ER -