Implementation of a surgical unit-based safety programme in African hospitals: A multicentre qualitative study

Lauren Clack, Ursina Willi, Sean Berenholtz, Alexander M. Aiken, Benedetta Allegranzi, Hugo Sax

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: A Surgical Unit-based Safety Programme (SUSP) has been shown to improve perioperative prevention practices and to reduce surgical site infections (SSI). It is critical to understand the factors influencing the successful implementation of the SUSP approach in low- and middle-income settings. We undertook a qualitative study to assess viability, and understand facilitators and barriers to implementing the SUSP approach in 5 African hospitals. Methods: Qualitative study based on interviews with individuals from all hospitals participating in a WHO-coordinated before-after SUSP study. The SUSP intervention consisted of a multimodal strategy including multiple SSI prevention measures combined with an adaptive approach aimed at improving teamwork and safety culture. Results: Thirteen interviews (5 head surgeons, 3 surgeons, 5 nurses) were conducted with staff from five hospital sites. Identified facilitators included influential individuals (intrinsic motivation of local SUSP teams, boundary spanners, multidisciplinary engagement, active leadership support), peer-to-peer learning (hospital networking and positive deviance, benchmarking), implementation fitness (enabling infrastructures, momentum from previous projects), and timely feedback of infection rates and process indicators. Barriers (organisational 'constipators', workload, mistrust, turnover) and local solutions to these were also identified. Conclusions: Participating hospitals benefitted from the SUSP programme structures (e.g. surveillance, hospital networks, formation of multidisciplinary teams) and adaptive tools (e.g. learning from defects, executive rounds guide) to change perceptions around patient safety and improve behaviours to prevent SSI. The combination of technical and adaptive elements represents a promising approach to facilitate the introduction of evidence-based best practices and to improve safety culture through local team engagement in resource-limited settings.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number91
JournalAntimicrobial resistance and infection control
Volume8
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - May 30 2019

Fingerprint

Multicenter Studies
Safety
Surgical Wound Infection
Safety Management
Learning
Interviews
Benchmarking
Evidence-Based Practice
Patient Safety
Workload
Practice Guidelines
Motivation
Nurses
Infection

Keywords

  • Implementation science
  • Infection prevention
  • Surgical site infection

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Microbiology (medical)
  • Infectious Diseases
  • Pharmacology (medical)

Cite this

Implementation of a surgical unit-based safety programme in African hospitals : A multicentre qualitative study. / Clack, Lauren; Willi, Ursina; Berenholtz, Sean; Aiken, Alexander M.; Allegranzi, Benedetta; Sax, Hugo.

In: Antimicrobial resistance and infection control, Vol. 8, No. 1, 91, 30.05.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Clack, Lauren ; Willi, Ursina ; Berenholtz, Sean ; Aiken, Alexander M. ; Allegranzi, Benedetta ; Sax, Hugo. / Implementation of a surgical unit-based safety programme in African hospitals : A multicentre qualitative study. In: Antimicrobial resistance and infection control. 2019 ; Vol. 8, No. 1.
@article{ec55bae7b45c4c53b4395db1c4adfb68,
title = "Implementation of a surgical unit-based safety programme in African hospitals: A multicentre qualitative study",
abstract = "Background: A Surgical Unit-based Safety Programme (SUSP) has been shown to improve perioperative prevention practices and to reduce surgical site infections (SSI). It is critical to understand the factors influencing the successful implementation of the SUSP approach in low- and middle-income settings. We undertook a qualitative study to assess viability, and understand facilitators and barriers to implementing the SUSP approach in 5 African hospitals. Methods: Qualitative study based on interviews with individuals from all hospitals participating in a WHO-coordinated before-after SUSP study. The SUSP intervention consisted of a multimodal strategy including multiple SSI prevention measures combined with an adaptive approach aimed at improving teamwork and safety culture. Results: Thirteen interviews (5 head surgeons, 3 surgeons, 5 nurses) were conducted with staff from five hospital sites. Identified facilitators included influential individuals (intrinsic motivation of local SUSP teams, boundary spanners, multidisciplinary engagement, active leadership support), peer-to-peer learning (hospital networking and positive deviance, benchmarking), implementation fitness (enabling infrastructures, momentum from previous projects), and timely feedback of infection rates and process indicators. Barriers (organisational 'constipators', workload, mistrust, turnover) and local solutions to these were also identified. Conclusions: Participating hospitals benefitted from the SUSP programme structures (e.g. surveillance, hospital networks, formation of multidisciplinary teams) and adaptive tools (e.g. learning from defects, executive rounds guide) to change perceptions around patient safety and improve behaviours to prevent SSI. The combination of technical and adaptive elements represents a promising approach to facilitate the introduction of evidence-based best practices and to improve safety culture through local team engagement in resource-limited settings.",
keywords = "Implementation science, Infection prevention, Surgical site infection",
author = "Lauren Clack and Ursina Willi and Sean Berenholtz and Aiken, {Alexander M.} and Benedetta Allegranzi and Hugo Sax",
year = "2019",
month = "5",
day = "30",
doi = "10.1186/s13756-019-0541-3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
journal = "Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control",
issn = "2047-2994",
publisher = "BioMed Central",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Implementation of a surgical unit-based safety programme in African hospitals

T2 - A multicentre qualitative study

AU - Clack, Lauren

AU - Willi, Ursina

AU - Berenholtz, Sean

AU - Aiken, Alexander M.

AU - Allegranzi, Benedetta

AU - Sax, Hugo

PY - 2019/5/30

Y1 - 2019/5/30

N2 - Background: A Surgical Unit-based Safety Programme (SUSP) has been shown to improve perioperative prevention practices and to reduce surgical site infections (SSI). It is critical to understand the factors influencing the successful implementation of the SUSP approach in low- and middle-income settings. We undertook a qualitative study to assess viability, and understand facilitators and barriers to implementing the SUSP approach in 5 African hospitals. Methods: Qualitative study based on interviews with individuals from all hospitals participating in a WHO-coordinated before-after SUSP study. The SUSP intervention consisted of a multimodal strategy including multiple SSI prevention measures combined with an adaptive approach aimed at improving teamwork and safety culture. Results: Thirteen interviews (5 head surgeons, 3 surgeons, 5 nurses) were conducted with staff from five hospital sites. Identified facilitators included influential individuals (intrinsic motivation of local SUSP teams, boundary spanners, multidisciplinary engagement, active leadership support), peer-to-peer learning (hospital networking and positive deviance, benchmarking), implementation fitness (enabling infrastructures, momentum from previous projects), and timely feedback of infection rates and process indicators. Barriers (organisational 'constipators', workload, mistrust, turnover) and local solutions to these were also identified. Conclusions: Participating hospitals benefitted from the SUSP programme structures (e.g. surveillance, hospital networks, formation of multidisciplinary teams) and adaptive tools (e.g. learning from defects, executive rounds guide) to change perceptions around patient safety and improve behaviours to prevent SSI. The combination of technical and adaptive elements represents a promising approach to facilitate the introduction of evidence-based best practices and to improve safety culture through local team engagement in resource-limited settings.

AB - Background: A Surgical Unit-based Safety Programme (SUSP) has been shown to improve perioperative prevention practices and to reduce surgical site infections (SSI). It is critical to understand the factors influencing the successful implementation of the SUSP approach in low- and middle-income settings. We undertook a qualitative study to assess viability, and understand facilitators and barriers to implementing the SUSP approach in 5 African hospitals. Methods: Qualitative study based on interviews with individuals from all hospitals participating in a WHO-coordinated before-after SUSP study. The SUSP intervention consisted of a multimodal strategy including multiple SSI prevention measures combined with an adaptive approach aimed at improving teamwork and safety culture. Results: Thirteen interviews (5 head surgeons, 3 surgeons, 5 nurses) were conducted with staff from five hospital sites. Identified facilitators included influential individuals (intrinsic motivation of local SUSP teams, boundary spanners, multidisciplinary engagement, active leadership support), peer-to-peer learning (hospital networking and positive deviance, benchmarking), implementation fitness (enabling infrastructures, momentum from previous projects), and timely feedback of infection rates and process indicators. Barriers (organisational 'constipators', workload, mistrust, turnover) and local solutions to these were also identified. Conclusions: Participating hospitals benefitted from the SUSP programme structures (e.g. surveillance, hospital networks, formation of multidisciplinary teams) and adaptive tools (e.g. learning from defects, executive rounds guide) to change perceptions around patient safety and improve behaviours to prevent SSI. The combination of technical and adaptive elements represents a promising approach to facilitate the introduction of evidence-based best practices and to improve safety culture through local team engagement in resource-limited settings.

KW - Implementation science

KW - Infection prevention

KW - Surgical site infection

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85066637629&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85066637629&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/s13756-019-0541-3

DO - 10.1186/s13756-019-0541-3

M3 - Article

C2 - 31164980

AN - SCOPUS:85066637629

VL - 8

JO - Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control

JF - Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control

SN - 2047-2994

IS - 1

M1 - 91

ER -