Implementation and effect of intensified case finding on diagnosis of tuberculosis in a large urban HIV clinic in Uganda: A retrospective cohort study.

Sabine Hermans, Esther Nasuuna, Frank Van Leth, Elena Byhoff, Miriam Schwarz, Andy Hoepelman, Joep Lange, Yukari C Manabe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Increased detection of tuberculosis (TB) using intensified or active case finding (ICF) is one of the cornerstones of the Stop TB Strategy, and contrasts with passive case finding (PCF) which relies on self-reported symptoms. There is no clear guidance on implementation strategies. We implemented ICF in addition to ongoing PCF in our large urban HIV clinic in July 2010 using a twice-daily announcement screen method by a trained peer educator, asking waiting patients to self-refer to a trained peer supporter for screening of TB symptoms. We sought to determine the associated effect on TB case detection. Methods. Suspects were investigated by sputum smear, chest X-ray and ultrasound, if indicated. Routinely collected clinical and laboratory data were merged with the ICF register and TB clinic data for patients attending the clinic in 2010. We compared the yield of TB cases (defined as the prevalence of newly diagnosed TB cases in the screened population), the type of TB diagnosed and the total cost per TB case identified (in United States Dollars [USD]) for the period before and after ICF implementation. Results: Of the 20,456 patients who visited the clinic in 2010, 614 were identified as TB suspects, 220 pre-ICF and 394 post-ICF (229 via PCF and 165 via ICF). The proportion diagnosed with TB dropped from 66% to 48% (60% in suspects identified through PCF and 31% through ICF). During the post-ICF period, TB suspects identified through ICF compared to PCF identification were more likely to be female, older, on ART and to have been enrolled in HIV care for a longer duration. The yield of combined PCF and ICF screening was 1.4% pre-ICF and 1.7% post-ICF with a cost per TB case identified of 12.29 USD and 21.80 USD, respectively. Conclusions: Implementation of ICF in a large HIV clinic yielded more TB suspects and cases, but substantially increased costs and was unable to capture the majority of TB suspects who were referred for diagnosis by clinicians through PCF. The overall yield of TB cases in a mature HIV clinic was low, although targeted screening of those recently enrolled in care may increase the yield.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number674
JournalBMC Public Health
Volume12
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2012

Fingerprint

Uganda
Tuberculosis
Cohort Studies
Retrospective Studies
HIV
Costs and Cost Analysis
Sputum

Keywords

  • Costing analysis
  • HIV/AIDS
  • Implementation research
  • Intensified case finding
  • Resource-limited setting
  • Screening
  • Tuberculosis
  • Yield

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Implementation and effect of intensified case finding on diagnosis of tuberculosis in a large urban HIV clinic in Uganda : A retrospective cohort study. / Hermans, Sabine; Nasuuna, Esther; Van Leth, Frank; Byhoff, Elena; Schwarz, Miriam; Hoepelman, Andy; Lange, Joep; Manabe, Yukari C.

In: BMC Public Health, Vol. 12, No. 1, 674, 2012.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hermans, Sabine ; Nasuuna, Esther ; Van Leth, Frank ; Byhoff, Elena ; Schwarz, Miriam ; Hoepelman, Andy ; Lange, Joep ; Manabe, Yukari C. / Implementation and effect of intensified case finding on diagnosis of tuberculosis in a large urban HIV clinic in Uganda : A retrospective cohort study. In: BMC Public Health. 2012 ; Vol. 12, No. 1.
@article{d5425e50365c47e88c864dc4a6cf3f70,
title = "Implementation and effect of intensified case finding on diagnosis of tuberculosis in a large urban HIV clinic in Uganda: A retrospective cohort study.",
abstract = "Background: Increased detection of tuberculosis (TB) using intensified or active case finding (ICF) is one of the cornerstones of the Stop TB Strategy, and contrasts with passive case finding (PCF) which relies on self-reported symptoms. There is no clear guidance on implementation strategies. We implemented ICF in addition to ongoing PCF in our large urban HIV clinic in July 2010 using a twice-daily announcement screen method by a trained peer educator, asking waiting patients to self-refer to a trained peer supporter for screening of TB symptoms. We sought to determine the associated effect on TB case detection. Methods. Suspects were investigated by sputum smear, chest X-ray and ultrasound, if indicated. Routinely collected clinical and laboratory data were merged with the ICF register and TB clinic data for patients attending the clinic in 2010. We compared the yield of TB cases (defined as the prevalence of newly diagnosed TB cases in the screened population), the type of TB diagnosed and the total cost per TB case identified (in United States Dollars [USD]) for the period before and after ICF implementation. Results: Of the 20,456 patients who visited the clinic in 2010, 614 were identified as TB suspects, 220 pre-ICF and 394 post-ICF (229 via PCF and 165 via ICF). The proportion diagnosed with TB dropped from 66{\%} to 48{\%} (60{\%} in suspects identified through PCF and 31{\%} through ICF). During the post-ICF period, TB suspects identified through ICF compared to PCF identification were more likely to be female, older, on ART and to have been enrolled in HIV care for a longer duration. The yield of combined PCF and ICF screening was 1.4{\%} pre-ICF and 1.7{\%} post-ICF with a cost per TB case identified of 12.29 USD and 21.80 USD, respectively. Conclusions: Implementation of ICF in a large HIV clinic yielded more TB suspects and cases, but substantially increased costs and was unable to capture the majority of TB suspects who were referred for diagnosis by clinicians through PCF. The overall yield of TB cases in a mature HIV clinic was low, although targeted screening of those recently enrolled in care may increase the yield.",
keywords = "Costing analysis, HIV/AIDS, Implementation research, Intensified case finding, Resource-limited setting, Screening, Tuberculosis, Yield",
author = "Sabine Hermans and Esther Nasuuna and {Van Leth}, Frank and Elena Byhoff and Miriam Schwarz and Andy Hoepelman and Joep Lange and Manabe, {Yukari C}",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1186/1471-2458-12-674",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
journal = "BMC Public Health",
issn = "1471-2458",
publisher = "BioMed Central",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Implementation and effect of intensified case finding on diagnosis of tuberculosis in a large urban HIV clinic in Uganda

T2 - A retrospective cohort study.

AU - Hermans, Sabine

AU - Nasuuna, Esther

AU - Van Leth, Frank

AU - Byhoff, Elena

AU - Schwarz, Miriam

AU - Hoepelman, Andy

AU - Lange, Joep

AU - Manabe, Yukari C

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Background: Increased detection of tuberculosis (TB) using intensified or active case finding (ICF) is one of the cornerstones of the Stop TB Strategy, and contrasts with passive case finding (PCF) which relies on self-reported symptoms. There is no clear guidance on implementation strategies. We implemented ICF in addition to ongoing PCF in our large urban HIV clinic in July 2010 using a twice-daily announcement screen method by a trained peer educator, asking waiting patients to self-refer to a trained peer supporter for screening of TB symptoms. We sought to determine the associated effect on TB case detection. Methods. Suspects were investigated by sputum smear, chest X-ray and ultrasound, if indicated. Routinely collected clinical and laboratory data were merged with the ICF register and TB clinic data for patients attending the clinic in 2010. We compared the yield of TB cases (defined as the prevalence of newly diagnosed TB cases in the screened population), the type of TB diagnosed and the total cost per TB case identified (in United States Dollars [USD]) for the period before and after ICF implementation. Results: Of the 20,456 patients who visited the clinic in 2010, 614 were identified as TB suspects, 220 pre-ICF and 394 post-ICF (229 via PCF and 165 via ICF). The proportion diagnosed with TB dropped from 66% to 48% (60% in suspects identified through PCF and 31% through ICF). During the post-ICF period, TB suspects identified through ICF compared to PCF identification were more likely to be female, older, on ART and to have been enrolled in HIV care for a longer duration. The yield of combined PCF and ICF screening was 1.4% pre-ICF and 1.7% post-ICF with a cost per TB case identified of 12.29 USD and 21.80 USD, respectively. Conclusions: Implementation of ICF in a large HIV clinic yielded more TB suspects and cases, but substantially increased costs and was unable to capture the majority of TB suspects who were referred for diagnosis by clinicians through PCF. The overall yield of TB cases in a mature HIV clinic was low, although targeted screening of those recently enrolled in care may increase the yield.

AB - Background: Increased detection of tuberculosis (TB) using intensified or active case finding (ICF) is one of the cornerstones of the Stop TB Strategy, and contrasts with passive case finding (PCF) which relies on self-reported symptoms. There is no clear guidance on implementation strategies. We implemented ICF in addition to ongoing PCF in our large urban HIV clinic in July 2010 using a twice-daily announcement screen method by a trained peer educator, asking waiting patients to self-refer to a trained peer supporter for screening of TB symptoms. We sought to determine the associated effect on TB case detection. Methods. Suspects were investigated by sputum smear, chest X-ray and ultrasound, if indicated. Routinely collected clinical and laboratory data were merged with the ICF register and TB clinic data for patients attending the clinic in 2010. We compared the yield of TB cases (defined as the prevalence of newly diagnosed TB cases in the screened population), the type of TB diagnosed and the total cost per TB case identified (in United States Dollars [USD]) for the period before and after ICF implementation. Results: Of the 20,456 patients who visited the clinic in 2010, 614 were identified as TB suspects, 220 pre-ICF and 394 post-ICF (229 via PCF and 165 via ICF). The proportion diagnosed with TB dropped from 66% to 48% (60% in suspects identified through PCF and 31% through ICF). During the post-ICF period, TB suspects identified through ICF compared to PCF identification were more likely to be female, older, on ART and to have been enrolled in HIV care for a longer duration. The yield of combined PCF and ICF screening was 1.4% pre-ICF and 1.7% post-ICF with a cost per TB case identified of 12.29 USD and 21.80 USD, respectively. Conclusions: Implementation of ICF in a large HIV clinic yielded more TB suspects and cases, but substantially increased costs and was unable to capture the majority of TB suspects who were referred for diagnosis by clinicians through PCF. The overall yield of TB cases in a mature HIV clinic was low, although targeted screening of those recently enrolled in care may increase the yield.

KW - Costing analysis

KW - HIV/AIDS

KW - Implementation research

KW - Intensified case finding

KW - Resource-limited setting

KW - Screening

KW - Tuberculosis

KW - Yield

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84865061898&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84865061898&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/1471-2458-12-674

DO - 10.1186/1471-2458-12-674

M3 - Article

C2 - 22905704

AN - SCOPUS:84865061898

VL - 12

JO - BMC Public Health

JF - BMC Public Health

SN - 1471-2458

IS - 1

M1 - 674

ER -