Impact of the 2010 Pakistan Floods on Rural and Urban Populations at Six Months

Thomas D. Kirsch, Christina Wadhwani, Lauren Sauer, Shannon Doocy, Christina Catlett

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The 2010 Pakistan flood affected 20 million people. The impact of the event and recovery is measured at 6 months. Methods: Cross-sectional cluster survey of 1769 households conducted six months post-flood in 29 mostaffected districts. The outcome measures were physical damage, flood-related death and illness and changes in income, access to electricity, clean water and sanitation facilities. Results: Households were headed by males, large and poor. The flood destroyed 54.8% of homes and caused 86.8% households to move, with 46.9% living in an IDP camp. Lack of electricity increased from 18.8% to 32.9% (p = 0.000), lack of toilet facilities from 29.0% to 40.4% (p=0.000). Access to protected water remained unchanged (96.8%); however, the sources changed (p=0.000). 88.0% reported loss of income (90.0% rural, 75.0% urban, p=0.000) with rural households loosing significantly more and less likely to recovered. Immediate deaths and injuries were uncommon but 77.0% reported flood-related illnesses. Significant differences were noted between urban and rural as well as gender and education of the head of houshold. Discussion: After 6 months, much of the population had not recovered their prior standard of living or access to services. Rural households were more commonly impacted and slower to recover. Targeting relief to high-risk populations including rural, female-headed and those with lower education is needed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere4fdfb212d2432
JournalPLoS Currents
DOIs
StatePublished - 2012

Fingerprint

Urban Population
Pakistan
Rural Population
Electricity
Inosine Diphosphate
Toilet Facilities
Education
Sanitation
Water
Cross-Sectional Studies
Head
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Wounds and Injuries
Population

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Impact of the 2010 Pakistan Floods on Rural and Urban Populations at Six Months. / Kirsch, Thomas D.; Wadhwani, Christina; Sauer, Lauren; Doocy, Shannon; Catlett, Christina.

In: PLoS Currents, 2012.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a69e58b193b946009294c2a82a3c06a1,
title = "Impact of the 2010 Pakistan Floods on Rural and Urban Populations at Six Months",
abstract = "The 2010 Pakistan flood affected 20 million people. The impact of the event and recovery is measured at 6 months. Methods: Cross-sectional cluster survey of 1769 households conducted six months post-flood in 29 mostaffected districts. The outcome measures were physical damage, flood-related death and illness and changes in income, access to electricity, clean water and sanitation facilities. Results: Households were headed by males, large and poor. The flood destroyed 54.8{\%} of homes and caused 86.8{\%} households to move, with 46.9{\%} living in an IDP camp. Lack of electricity increased from 18.8{\%} to 32.9{\%} (p = 0.000), lack of toilet facilities from 29.0{\%} to 40.4{\%} (p=0.000). Access to protected water remained unchanged (96.8{\%}); however, the sources changed (p=0.000). 88.0{\%} reported loss of income (90.0{\%} rural, 75.0{\%} urban, p=0.000) with rural households loosing significantly more and less likely to recovered. Immediate deaths and injuries were uncommon but 77.0{\%} reported flood-related illnesses. Significant differences were noted between urban and rural as well as gender and education of the head of houshold. Discussion: After 6 months, much of the population had not recovered their prior standard of living or access to services. Rural households were more commonly impacted and slower to recover. Targeting relief to high-risk populations including rural, female-headed and those with lower education is needed.",
author = "Kirsch, {Thomas D.} and Christina Wadhwani and Lauren Sauer and Shannon Doocy and Christina Catlett",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1371/4fdfb212d2432",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "PLoS Currents",
issn = "2157-3999",
publisher = "Public Library of Science",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Impact of the 2010 Pakistan Floods on Rural and Urban Populations at Six Months

AU - Kirsch, Thomas D.

AU - Wadhwani, Christina

AU - Sauer, Lauren

AU - Doocy, Shannon

AU - Catlett, Christina

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - The 2010 Pakistan flood affected 20 million people. The impact of the event and recovery is measured at 6 months. Methods: Cross-sectional cluster survey of 1769 households conducted six months post-flood in 29 mostaffected districts. The outcome measures were physical damage, flood-related death and illness and changes in income, access to electricity, clean water and sanitation facilities. Results: Households were headed by males, large and poor. The flood destroyed 54.8% of homes and caused 86.8% households to move, with 46.9% living in an IDP camp. Lack of electricity increased from 18.8% to 32.9% (p = 0.000), lack of toilet facilities from 29.0% to 40.4% (p=0.000). Access to protected water remained unchanged (96.8%); however, the sources changed (p=0.000). 88.0% reported loss of income (90.0% rural, 75.0% urban, p=0.000) with rural households loosing significantly more and less likely to recovered. Immediate deaths and injuries were uncommon but 77.0% reported flood-related illnesses. Significant differences were noted between urban and rural as well as gender and education of the head of houshold. Discussion: After 6 months, much of the population had not recovered their prior standard of living or access to services. Rural households were more commonly impacted and slower to recover. Targeting relief to high-risk populations including rural, female-headed and those with lower education is needed.

AB - The 2010 Pakistan flood affected 20 million people. The impact of the event and recovery is measured at 6 months. Methods: Cross-sectional cluster survey of 1769 households conducted six months post-flood in 29 mostaffected districts. The outcome measures were physical damage, flood-related death and illness and changes in income, access to electricity, clean water and sanitation facilities. Results: Households were headed by males, large and poor. The flood destroyed 54.8% of homes and caused 86.8% households to move, with 46.9% living in an IDP camp. Lack of electricity increased from 18.8% to 32.9% (p = 0.000), lack of toilet facilities from 29.0% to 40.4% (p=0.000). Access to protected water remained unchanged (96.8%); however, the sources changed (p=0.000). 88.0% reported loss of income (90.0% rural, 75.0% urban, p=0.000) with rural households loosing significantly more and less likely to recovered. Immediate deaths and injuries were uncommon but 77.0% reported flood-related illnesses. Significant differences were noted between urban and rural as well as gender and education of the head of houshold. Discussion: After 6 months, much of the population had not recovered their prior standard of living or access to services. Rural households were more commonly impacted and slower to recover. Targeting relief to high-risk populations including rural, female-headed and those with lower education is needed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84867471522&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84867471522&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1371/4fdfb212d2432

DO - 10.1371/4fdfb212d2432

M3 - Article

C2 - 22984644

AN - SCOPUS:84867471522

JO - PLoS Currents

JF - PLoS Currents

SN - 2157-3999

M1 - e4fdfb212d2432

ER -