Impact of a new palliative care program on health system finances

An analysis of the palliative care program inpatient unit and consultations at johns hopkins medical institutions

Sarina R. Isenberg, Chunhua Lu, John McQuade, Kelvin K.W. Chan, Natasha Gill, Michael Cardamone, Deirdre Torto, Terry Langbaum, Abdul Rab Razzak, Thomas J Smith

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose Palliative care inpatient units (PCUs) can improve symptoms, family perception of care, and lower per-diem costs compared with usual care. In March 2013, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions (JHMI) added a PCU to the palliative care (PC) program. We studied the financial impact of the PC program on JHMI from March 2013 to March 2014. Methods This study considered three components of the PC program: PCU, PC consultations, and professional fees. Using 13 months of admissions data, the team calculated the per-day variable cost pre-PCU (ie, in another hospital unit) and after transfer to the PCU. These fees were multiplied by the number of patients transferred to the PCU and by the average length of stay in the PCU. Consultation savings were estimated using established methods. Professional fees assumed a collection rate of 50%. Results The total positive financial impact of the PC program was $3,488,863.17. There were 153 transfers to the PCU, 60% with cancer, and an average length of stay of 5.11 days. The daily loss pretransfer to the PCU of $1,797.67 was reduced to $1,345.34 in the PCU (225%). The PCU saved JHMI $353,645.17 in variable costs, or $452.33 per transfer. Cost savings for PC consultations in the hospital, 60% with cancer, were estimated at $2,765,218. $370,000 was collected in professional fees savings. Conclusion The PCU and PC program had a favorable impact on JHMI while providing expert patient-centered care. As JHMI moves to an accountable care organization model, value-based patient-centered care and increased intensive care unit availability are desirable.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)e421-e428
JournalJournal of Oncology Practice
Volume13
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Palliative Care
Inpatients
Referral and Consultation
Health
Fees and Charges
Patient-Centered Care
Costs and Cost Analysis
Length of Stay
Accountable Care Organizations
Hospital Units
Cost Savings

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Oncology(nursing)
  • Health Policy

Cite this

Impact of a new palliative care program on health system finances : An analysis of the palliative care program inpatient unit and consultations at johns hopkins medical institutions. / Isenberg, Sarina R.; Lu, Chunhua; McQuade, John; Chan, Kelvin K.W.; Gill, Natasha; Cardamone, Michael; Torto, Deirdre; Langbaum, Terry; Razzak, Abdul Rab; Smith, Thomas J.

In: Journal of Oncology Practice, Vol. 13, No. 5, 01.05.2017, p. e421-e428.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Isenberg, Sarina R. ; Lu, Chunhua ; McQuade, John ; Chan, Kelvin K.W. ; Gill, Natasha ; Cardamone, Michael ; Torto, Deirdre ; Langbaum, Terry ; Razzak, Abdul Rab ; Smith, Thomas J. / Impact of a new palliative care program on health system finances : An analysis of the palliative care program inpatient unit and consultations at johns hopkins medical institutions. In: Journal of Oncology Practice. 2017 ; Vol. 13, No. 5. pp. e421-e428.
@article{4a83c60684dd4242b261c6312ed8c143,
title = "Impact of a new palliative care program on health system finances: An analysis of the palliative care program inpatient unit and consultations at johns hopkins medical institutions",
abstract = "Purpose Palliative care inpatient units (PCUs) can improve symptoms, family perception of care, and lower per-diem costs compared with usual care. In March 2013, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions (JHMI) added a PCU to the palliative care (PC) program. We studied the financial impact of the PC program on JHMI from March 2013 to March 2014. Methods This study considered three components of the PC program: PCU, PC consultations, and professional fees. Using 13 months of admissions data, the team calculated the per-day variable cost pre-PCU (ie, in another hospital unit) and after transfer to the PCU. These fees were multiplied by the number of patients transferred to the PCU and by the average length of stay in the PCU. Consultation savings were estimated using established methods. Professional fees assumed a collection rate of 50{\%}. Results The total positive financial impact of the PC program was $3,488,863.17. There were 153 transfers to the PCU, 60{\%} with cancer, and an average length of stay of 5.11 days. The daily loss pretransfer to the PCU of $1,797.67 was reduced to $1,345.34 in the PCU (225{\%}). The PCU saved JHMI $353,645.17 in variable costs, or $452.33 per transfer. Cost savings for PC consultations in the hospital, 60{\%} with cancer, were estimated at $2,765,218. $370,000 was collected in professional fees savings. Conclusion The PCU and PC program had a favorable impact on JHMI while providing expert patient-centered care. As JHMI moves to an accountable care organization model, value-based patient-centered care and increased intensive care unit availability are desirable.",
author = "Isenberg, {Sarina R.} and Chunhua Lu and John McQuade and Chan, {Kelvin K.W.} and Natasha Gill and Michael Cardamone and Deirdre Torto and Terry Langbaum and Razzak, {Abdul Rab} and Smith, {Thomas J}",
year = "2017",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1200/JOP.2016.014860",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
pages = "e421--e428",
journal = "Journal of Oncology Practice",
issn = "1554-7477",
publisher = "American Society of Clinical Oncology",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Impact of a new palliative care program on health system finances

T2 - An analysis of the palliative care program inpatient unit and consultations at johns hopkins medical institutions

AU - Isenberg, Sarina R.

AU - Lu, Chunhua

AU - McQuade, John

AU - Chan, Kelvin K.W.

AU - Gill, Natasha

AU - Cardamone, Michael

AU - Torto, Deirdre

AU - Langbaum, Terry

AU - Razzak, Abdul Rab

AU - Smith, Thomas J

PY - 2017/5/1

Y1 - 2017/5/1

N2 - Purpose Palliative care inpatient units (PCUs) can improve symptoms, family perception of care, and lower per-diem costs compared with usual care. In March 2013, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions (JHMI) added a PCU to the palliative care (PC) program. We studied the financial impact of the PC program on JHMI from March 2013 to March 2014. Methods This study considered three components of the PC program: PCU, PC consultations, and professional fees. Using 13 months of admissions data, the team calculated the per-day variable cost pre-PCU (ie, in another hospital unit) and after transfer to the PCU. These fees were multiplied by the number of patients transferred to the PCU and by the average length of stay in the PCU. Consultation savings were estimated using established methods. Professional fees assumed a collection rate of 50%. Results The total positive financial impact of the PC program was $3,488,863.17. There were 153 transfers to the PCU, 60% with cancer, and an average length of stay of 5.11 days. The daily loss pretransfer to the PCU of $1,797.67 was reduced to $1,345.34 in the PCU (225%). The PCU saved JHMI $353,645.17 in variable costs, or $452.33 per transfer. Cost savings for PC consultations in the hospital, 60% with cancer, were estimated at $2,765,218. $370,000 was collected in professional fees savings. Conclusion The PCU and PC program had a favorable impact on JHMI while providing expert patient-centered care. As JHMI moves to an accountable care organization model, value-based patient-centered care and increased intensive care unit availability are desirable.

AB - Purpose Palliative care inpatient units (PCUs) can improve symptoms, family perception of care, and lower per-diem costs compared with usual care. In March 2013, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions (JHMI) added a PCU to the palliative care (PC) program. We studied the financial impact of the PC program on JHMI from March 2013 to March 2014. Methods This study considered three components of the PC program: PCU, PC consultations, and professional fees. Using 13 months of admissions data, the team calculated the per-day variable cost pre-PCU (ie, in another hospital unit) and after transfer to the PCU. These fees were multiplied by the number of patients transferred to the PCU and by the average length of stay in the PCU. Consultation savings were estimated using established methods. Professional fees assumed a collection rate of 50%. Results The total positive financial impact of the PC program was $3,488,863.17. There were 153 transfers to the PCU, 60% with cancer, and an average length of stay of 5.11 days. The daily loss pretransfer to the PCU of $1,797.67 was reduced to $1,345.34 in the PCU (225%). The PCU saved JHMI $353,645.17 in variable costs, or $452.33 per transfer. Cost savings for PC consultations in the hospital, 60% with cancer, were estimated at $2,765,218. $370,000 was collected in professional fees savings. Conclusion The PCU and PC program had a favorable impact on JHMI while providing expert patient-centered care. As JHMI moves to an accountable care organization model, value-based patient-centered care and increased intensive care unit availability are desirable.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85026833710&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85026833710&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1200/JOP.2016.014860

DO - 10.1200/JOP.2016.014860

M3 - Article

VL - 13

SP - e421-e428

JO - Journal of Oncology Practice

JF - Journal of Oncology Practice

SN - 1554-7477

IS - 5

ER -