Imaging features of aortic aneurysm instability

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Imaging description The diagnosis of aortic aneurysm rupture is straightforward on CT. Both precontrast and post-contrast acquisitions will demonstrate disruption of the aneurysm wall with perianeurysm hemorrhage extending into the retroperitoneum and possibly the peritoneal cavity. Prior to frank rupture, certain findings on CT may reflect instability of an intact abdominal aortic aneurysm or contained rupture. Instability indicators include intramural or intrathrombus hemorrhage (“hyperattenuating crescent” sign), perianeurysmal hemorrhage, and disruption of previously continuous aortic wall calcification. The hyperattenuating crescent sign indicates hemorrhage within aneurysm thrombus or the aneurysm wall, and can be recognized by high-attenuation material within the plaque or the wall (Figure 62.1). A small perianeurysm hematoma may be identified prior to frank rupture, suggesting contained rupture (Figure 62.2). Contained rupture may also manifest as a new focal outpouching of the aortic wall or the “draped aorta” sign (Figures 62.3, 62.4). The latter appears as loss of the fat plane between the posterior wall of the aortic aneurysm and the adjacent vertebral body, and psoas muscle on axial images, and a focal posterior outpouching on sagittal MPRs. Cognizance of these findings is essential so that the interpreting radiologist can alert the vascular surgeon to guide intervention. Careful assessment for aneurysm enlargement is equally important. A size threshold of 5.5cm has been defined for repair of an abdominal aortic aneurysm. The typical rate of aneurysm enlargement is 1–4mm/year. Rapid aneurysm enlargement is defined as > 6mm in 6 months or >1cm in one year. Measurement should be tailored to the configuration of the aneurysm and performed on current and prior CT examinations for optimal reproducibility. If available, comparison to older studies is recommended, because changes in size may be more apparent than comparison to recent studies alone. Importance Imaging signs that suggest a high risk of rupture are important to recognize to prompt treatment before the occurrence of acute aortic rupture, which has a very high mortality rate.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationPearls and Pitfalls in Cardiovascular Imaging: Pseudolesions, Artifacts and Other Difficult Diagnoses
PublisherCambridge University Press
Pages200-203
Number of pages4
ISBN (Print)9781139152228, 9781107023727
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015

Fingerprint

Aortic Aneurysm
Aneurysm
Rupture
Hemorrhage
Aortic Rupture
Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm
Psoas Muscles
Peritoneal Cavity
Hematoma
Blood Vessels
Aorta
Thrombosis
Fats
Mortality

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Johnson, P. (2015). Imaging features of aortic aneurysm instability. In Pearls and Pitfalls in Cardiovascular Imaging: Pseudolesions, Artifacts and Other Difficult Diagnoses (pp. 200-203). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139152228.063

Imaging features of aortic aneurysm instability. / Johnson, Pamela.

Pearls and Pitfalls in Cardiovascular Imaging: Pseudolesions, Artifacts and Other Difficult Diagnoses. Cambridge University Press, 2015. p. 200-203.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Johnson, P 2015, Imaging features of aortic aneurysm instability. in Pearls and Pitfalls in Cardiovascular Imaging: Pseudolesions, Artifacts and Other Difficult Diagnoses. Cambridge University Press, pp. 200-203. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139152228.063
Johnson P. Imaging features of aortic aneurysm instability. In Pearls and Pitfalls in Cardiovascular Imaging: Pseudolesions, Artifacts and Other Difficult Diagnoses. Cambridge University Press. 2015. p. 200-203 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139152228.063
Johnson, Pamela. / Imaging features of aortic aneurysm instability. Pearls and Pitfalls in Cardiovascular Imaging: Pseudolesions, Artifacts and Other Difficult Diagnoses. Cambridge University Press, 2015. pp. 200-203
@inbook{a444f98f339a469cb644d8836f4cdd2d,
title = "Imaging features of aortic aneurysm instability",
abstract = "Imaging description The diagnosis of aortic aneurysm rupture is straightforward on CT. Both precontrast and post-contrast acquisitions will demonstrate disruption of the aneurysm wall with perianeurysm hemorrhage extending into the retroperitoneum and possibly the peritoneal cavity. Prior to frank rupture, certain findings on CT may reflect instability of an intact abdominal aortic aneurysm or contained rupture. Instability indicators include intramural or intrathrombus hemorrhage (“hyperattenuating crescent” sign), perianeurysmal hemorrhage, and disruption of previously continuous aortic wall calcification. The hyperattenuating crescent sign indicates hemorrhage within aneurysm thrombus or the aneurysm wall, and can be recognized by high-attenuation material within the plaque or the wall (Figure 62.1). A small perianeurysm hematoma may be identified prior to frank rupture, suggesting contained rupture (Figure 62.2). Contained rupture may also manifest as a new focal outpouching of the aortic wall or the “draped aorta” sign (Figures 62.3, 62.4). The latter appears as loss of the fat plane between the posterior wall of the aortic aneurysm and the adjacent vertebral body, and psoas muscle on axial images, and a focal posterior outpouching on sagittal MPRs. Cognizance of these findings is essential so that the interpreting radiologist can alert the vascular surgeon to guide intervention. Careful assessment for aneurysm enlargement is equally important. A size threshold of 5.5cm has been defined for repair of an abdominal aortic aneurysm. The typical rate of aneurysm enlargement is 1–4mm/year. Rapid aneurysm enlargement is defined as > 6mm in 6 months or >1cm in one year. Measurement should be tailored to the configuration of the aneurysm and performed on current and prior CT examinations for optimal reproducibility. If available, comparison to older studies is recommended, because changes in size may be more apparent than comparison to recent studies alone. Importance Imaging signs that suggest a high risk of rupture are important to recognize to prompt treatment before the occurrence of acute aortic rupture, which has a very high mortality rate.",
author = "Pamela Johnson",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/CBO9781139152228.063",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9781139152228",
pages = "200--203",
booktitle = "Pearls and Pitfalls in Cardiovascular Imaging: Pseudolesions, Artifacts and Other Difficult Diagnoses",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Imaging features of aortic aneurysm instability

AU - Johnson, Pamela

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Imaging description The diagnosis of aortic aneurysm rupture is straightforward on CT. Both precontrast and post-contrast acquisitions will demonstrate disruption of the aneurysm wall with perianeurysm hemorrhage extending into the retroperitoneum and possibly the peritoneal cavity. Prior to frank rupture, certain findings on CT may reflect instability of an intact abdominal aortic aneurysm or contained rupture. Instability indicators include intramural or intrathrombus hemorrhage (“hyperattenuating crescent” sign), perianeurysmal hemorrhage, and disruption of previously continuous aortic wall calcification. The hyperattenuating crescent sign indicates hemorrhage within aneurysm thrombus or the aneurysm wall, and can be recognized by high-attenuation material within the plaque or the wall (Figure 62.1). A small perianeurysm hematoma may be identified prior to frank rupture, suggesting contained rupture (Figure 62.2). Contained rupture may also manifest as a new focal outpouching of the aortic wall or the “draped aorta” sign (Figures 62.3, 62.4). The latter appears as loss of the fat plane between the posterior wall of the aortic aneurysm and the adjacent vertebral body, and psoas muscle on axial images, and a focal posterior outpouching on sagittal MPRs. Cognizance of these findings is essential so that the interpreting radiologist can alert the vascular surgeon to guide intervention. Careful assessment for aneurysm enlargement is equally important. A size threshold of 5.5cm has been defined for repair of an abdominal aortic aneurysm. The typical rate of aneurysm enlargement is 1–4mm/year. Rapid aneurysm enlargement is defined as > 6mm in 6 months or >1cm in one year. Measurement should be tailored to the configuration of the aneurysm and performed on current and prior CT examinations for optimal reproducibility. If available, comparison to older studies is recommended, because changes in size may be more apparent than comparison to recent studies alone. Importance Imaging signs that suggest a high risk of rupture are important to recognize to prompt treatment before the occurrence of acute aortic rupture, which has a very high mortality rate.

AB - Imaging description The diagnosis of aortic aneurysm rupture is straightforward on CT. Both precontrast and post-contrast acquisitions will demonstrate disruption of the aneurysm wall with perianeurysm hemorrhage extending into the retroperitoneum and possibly the peritoneal cavity. Prior to frank rupture, certain findings on CT may reflect instability of an intact abdominal aortic aneurysm or contained rupture. Instability indicators include intramural or intrathrombus hemorrhage (“hyperattenuating crescent” sign), perianeurysmal hemorrhage, and disruption of previously continuous aortic wall calcification. The hyperattenuating crescent sign indicates hemorrhage within aneurysm thrombus or the aneurysm wall, and can be recognized by high-attenuation material within the plaque or the wall (Figure 62.1). A small perianeurysm hematoma may be identified prior to frank rupture, suggesting contained rupture (Figure 62.2). Contained rupture may also manifest as a new focal outpouching of the aortic wall or the “draped aorta” sign (Figures 62.3, 62.4). The latter appears as loss of the fat plane between the posterior wall of the aortic aneurysm and the adjacent vertebral body, and psoas muscle on axial images, and a focal posterior outpouching on sagittal MPRs. Cognizance of these findings is essential so that the interpreting radiologist can alert the vascular surgeon to guide intervention. Careful assessment for aneurysm enlargement is equally important. A size threshold of 5.5cm has been defined for repair of an abdominal aortic aneurysm. The typical rate of aneurysm enlargement is 1–4mm/year. Rapid aneurysm enlargement is defined as > 6mm in 6 months or >1cm in one year. Measurement should be tailored to the configuration of the aneurysm and performed on current and prior CT examinations for optimal reproducibility. If available, comparison to older studies is recommended, because changes in size may be more apparent than comparison to recent studies alone. Importance Imaging signs that suggest a high risk of rupture are important to recognize to prompt treatment before the occurrence of acute aortic rupture, which has a very high mortality rate.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84954145491&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84954145491&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/CBO9781139152228.063

DO - 10.1017/CBO9781139152228.063

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:84954145491

SN - 9781139152228

SN - 9781107023727

SP - 200

EP - 203

BT - Pearls and Pitfalls in Cardiovascular Imaging: Pseudolesions, Artifacts and Other Difficult Diagnoses

PB - Cambridge University Press

ER -