Imaging differentiation of pathologic fractures caused by primary and secondary bone tumors

Theodoros Soldatos, Majid Chalian, Samer Attar, Edward F McCarthy, John A. Carrino, Laura M Fayad

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: To describe pre-treatment imaging features of pathologic fractures caused by primary bone tumors (PBTs) and metastatic bone tumors (MBTs) and determine if radiographic or cross-sectional features can differentiate the underlying pathologies associated with the fractures. Methods: Sixty-nine patients with a diagnosis of a pathologic fracture were enrolled. Biopsy established PBT as the cause of the pathologic fracture in 16 (23%) cases and MBT in 53 (77%) cases. The radiographs, computed tomography (CT) scans, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans of the subjects were retrospectively reviewed for the presence of multiple imaging features. Results: Compared to pathologic fractures caused by MBTs, the fractures caused by PBTs demonstrated a higher incidence of lytic bone cortex, mineralization and a soft-tissue mass on radiographs, mineralization and a soft-tissue mass on CT scans, and periosteal abnormality on MRI scans (P <0.01). These features also exhibited a high negative predictive value in supporting the diagnosis of an underlying PBT over MBT. Conclusion: Pathologic fractures caused by PBT and MBT may be differentiated by a few specific radiographic and CT imaging features, though MRI was poor for characterization of the underlying lesion. Such knowledge may assist radiologists in raising the possibility of a PBT as the cause of a pathologic fracture.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalEuropean Journal of Radiology
Volume82
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2013

Fingerprint

Spontaneous Fractures
Bone and Bones
Neoplasms
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Tomography
X Ray Tomography
Physiologic Calcification
Bone Fractures
Pathology

Keywords

  • Bone tumor
  • Computed tomography
  • Pathologic fracture

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Imaging differentiation of pathologic fractures caused by primary and secondary bone tumors. / Soldatos, Theodoros; Chalian, Majid; Attar, Samer; McCarthy, Edward F; Carrino, John A.; Fayad, Laura M.

In: European Journal of Radiology, Vol. 82, No. 1, 01.2013.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9d7d3079e05641e7a1e2d5238726d0d2,
title = "Imaging differentiation of pathologic fractures caused by primary and secondary bone tumors",
abstract = "Objective: To describe pre-treatment imaging features of pathologic fractures caused by primary bone tumors (PBTs) and metastatic bone tumors (MBTs) and determine if radiographic or cross-sectional features can differentiate the underlying pathologies associated with the fractures. Methods: Sixty-nine patients with a diagnosis of a pathologic fracture were enrolled. Biopsy established PBT as the cause of the pathologic fracture in 16 (23{\%}) cases and MBT in 53 (77{\%}) cases. The radiographs, computed tomography (CT) scans, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans of the subjects were retrospectively reviewed for the presence of multiple imaging features. Results: Compared to pathologic fractures caused by MBTs, the fractures caused by PBTs demonstrated a higher incidence of lytic bone cortex, mineralization and a soft-tissue mass on radiographs, mineralization and a soft-tissue mass on CT scans, and periosteal abnormality on MRI scans (P <0.01). These features also exhibited a high negative predictive value in supporting the diagnosis of an underlying PBT over MBT. Conclusion: Pathologic fractures caused by PBT and MBT may be differentiated by a few specific radiographic and CT imaging features, though MRI was poor for characterization of the underlying lesion. Such knowledge may assist radiologists in raising the possibility of a PBT as the cause of a pathologic fracture.",
keywords = "Bone tumor, Computed tomography, Pathologic fracture",
author = "Theodoros Soldatos and Majid Chalian and Samer Attar and McCarthy, {Edward F} and Carrino, {John A.} and Fayad, {Laura M}",
year = "2013",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.08.016",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "82",
journal = "Journal of Medical Imaging",
issn = "0720-048X",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Imaging differentiation of pathologic fractures caused by primary and secondary bone tumors

AU - Soldatos, Theodoros

AU - Chalian, Majid

AU - Attar, Samer

AU - McCarthy, Edward F

AU - Carrino, John A.

AU - Fayad, Laura M

PY - 2013/1

Y1 - 2013/1

N2 - Objective: To describe pre-treatment imaging features of pathologic fractures caused by primary bone tumors (PBTs) and metastatic bone tumors (MBTs) and determine if radiographic or cross-sectional features can differentiate the underlying pathologies associated with the fractures. Methods: Sixty-nine patients with a diagnosis of a pathologic fracture were enrolled. Biopsy established PBT as the cause of the pathologic fracture in 16 (23%) cases and MBT in 53 (77%) cases. The radiographs, computed tomography (CT) scans, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans of the subjects were retrospectively reviewed for the presence of multiple imaging features. Results: Compared to pathologic fractures caused by MBTs, the fractures caused by PBTs demonstrated a higher incidence of lytic bone cortex, mineralization and a soft-tissue mass on radiographs, mineralization and a soft-tissue mass on CT scans, and periosteal abnormality on MRI scans (P <0.01). These features also exhibited a high negative predictive value in supporting the diagnosis of an underlying PBT over MBT. Conclusion: Pathologic fractures caused by PBT and MBT may be differentiated by a few specific radiographic and CT imaging features, though MRI was poor for characterization of the underlying lesion. Such knowledge may assist radiologists in raising the possibility of a PBT as the cause of a pathologic fracture.

AB - Objective: To describe pre-treatment imaging features of pathologic fractures caused by primary bone tumors (PBTs) and metastatic bone tumors (MBTs) and determine if radiographic or cross-sectional features can differentiate the underlying pathologies associated with the fractures. Methods: Sixty-nine patients with a diagnosis of a pathologic fracture were enrolled. Biopsy established PBT as the cause of the pathologic fracture in 16 (23%) cases and MBT in 53 (77%) cases. The radiographs, computed tomography (CT) scans, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans of the subjects were retrospectively reviewed for the presence of multiple imaging features. Results: Compared to pathologic fractures caused by MBTs, the fractures caused by PBTs demonstrated a higher incidence of lytic bone cortex, mineralization and a soft-tissue mass on radiographs, mineralization and a soft-tissue mass on CT scans, and periosteal abnormality on MRI scans (P <0.01). These features also exhibited a high negative predictive value in supporting the diagnosis of an underlying PBT over MBT. Conclusion: Pathologic fractures caused by PBT and MBT may be differentiated by a few specific radiographic and CT imaging features, though MRI was poor for characterization of the underlying lesion. Such knowledge may assist radiologists in raising the possibility of a PBT as the cause of a pathologic fracture.

KW - Bone tumor

KW - Computed tomography

KW - Pathologic fracture

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84871719946&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84871719946&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.08.016

DO - 10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.08.016

M3 - Article

C2 - 23017193

AN - SCOPUS:84871719946

VL - 82

JO - Journal of Medical Imaging

JF - Journal of Medical Imaging

SN - 0720-048X

IS - 1

ER -