Image processing from 2D to 3D

Steven P. Rowe, Elliot K Fishman

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Three-dimensional representations of volumetric CT data provide a powerful means to display and perceive complex anatomy and pathology. The development of advanced, multi-slice CT scanners that could rapidly acquire isotropic data sets without significant patient respiratory or voluntary motion has allowed for the implementation of a number of 3D reconstruction methods into clinical practice. In this chapter, we will discuss the technical considerations that underlie the most common 3D reconstruction methodologies (including surface rendering, maximum intensity projection, volume rendering, and cinematic rendering), the similarities and differences between these methodologies and how this impacts the types of imaging data each methodology is most suited to evaluate, and provide examples of some of the most common clinical uses of these techniques.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationMedical Radiology
PublisherSpringer Verlag
Pages103-120
Number of pages18
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Publication series

NameMedical Radiology
ISSN (Print)0942-5373
ISSN (Electronic)2197-4187

Fingerprint

Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
Anatomy
Pathology
Datasets

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Rowe, S. P., & Fishman, E. K. (2019). Image processing from 2D to 3D. In Medical Radiology (pp. 103-120). (Medical Radiology). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/174_2017_136

Image processing from 2D to 3D. / Rowe, Steven P.; Fishman, Elliot K.

Medical Radiology. Springer Verlag, 2019. p. 103-120 (Medical Radiology).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Rowe, SP & Fishman, EK 2019, Image processing from 2D to 3D. in Medical Radiology. Medical Radiology, Springer Verlag, pp. 103-120. https://doi.org/10.1007/174_2017_136
Rowe SP, Fishman EK. Image processing from 2D to 3D. In Medical Radiology. Springer Verlag. 2019. p. 103-120. (Medical Radiology). https://doi.org/10.1007/174_2017_136
Rowe, Steven P. ; Fishman, Elliot K. / Image processing from 2D to 3D. Medical Radiology. Springer Verlag, 2019. pp. 103-120 (Medical Radiology).
@inbook{a7034eabd59748fcbaa2e3f410bf4f2f,
title = "Image processing from 2D to 3D",
abstract = "Three-dimensional representations of volumetric CT data provide a powerful means to display and perceive complex anatomy and pathology. The development of advanced, multi-slice CT scanners that could rapidly acquire isotropic data sets without significant patient respiratory or voluntary motion has allowed for the implementation of a number of 3D reconstruction methods into clinical practice. In this chapter, we will discuss the technical considerations that underlie the most common 3D reconstruction methodologies (including surface rendering, maximum intensity projection, volume rendering, and cinematic rendering), the similarities and differences between these methodologies and how this impacts the types of imaging data each methodology is most suited to evaluate, and provide examples of some of the most common clinical uses of these techniques.",
author = "Rowe, {Steven P.} and Fishman, {Elliot K}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/174_2017_136",
language = "English (US)",
series = "Medical Radiology",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
pages = "103--120",
booktitle = "Medical Radiology",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Image processing from 2D to 3D

AU - Rowe, Steven P.

AU - Fishman, Elliot K

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Three-dimensional representations of volumetric CT data provide a powerful means to display and perceive complex anatomy and pathology. The development of advanced, multi-slice CT scanners that could rapidly acquire isotropic data sets without significant patient respiratory or voluntary motion has allowed for the implementation of a number of 3D reconstruction methods into clinical practice. In this chapter, we will discuss the technical considerations that underlie the most common 3D reconstruction methodologies (including surface rendering, maximum intensity projection, volume rendering, and cinematic rendering), the similarities and differences between these methodologies and how this impacts the types of imaging data each methodology is most suited to evaluate, and provide examples of some of the most common clinical uses of these techniques.

AB - Three-dimensional representations of volumetric CT data provide a powerful means to display and perceive complex anatomy and pathology. The development of advanced, multi-slice CT scanners that could rapidly acquire isotropic data sets without significant patient respiratory or voluntary motion has allowed for the implementation of a number of 3D reconstruction methods into clinical practice. In this chapter, we will discuss the technical considerations that underlie the most common 3D reconstruction methodologies (including surface rendering, maximum intensity projection, volume rendering, and cinematic rendering), the similarities and differences between these methodologies and how this impacts the types of imaging data each methodology is most suited to evaluate, and provide examples of some of the most common clinical uses of these techniques.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85072750485&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85072750485&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/174_2017_136

DO - 10.1007/174_2017_136

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:85072750485

T3 - Medical Radiology

SP - 103

EP - 120

BT - Medical Radiology

PB - Springer Verlag

ER -