TY - JOUR
T1 - Image-guided Sports Medicine and Musculoskeletal Tumor Interventions
T2 - A Patient-Centered Model
AU - Dalili, Danoob
AU - Isaac, Amanda
AU - Rashidi, Ali
AU - Åström, Gunnar
AU - Fritz, Jan
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 American Institute of Physics Inc.. All rights reserved.
PY - 2020/6/1
Y1 - 2020/6/1
N2 - The spectrum of effective musculoskeletal (MSK) interventions is broadening and rapidly evolving. Increasing demands incite a perpetual need to optimize services and interventions by maximizing the diagnostic and therapeutic yield, reducing exposure to ionizing radiation, increasing cost efficiency, as well as identifying and promoting effective procedures to excel in patient satisfaction ratings and outcomes. MSK interventions for the treatment of oncological conditions, and conditions related to sports injury can be performed with different imaging modalities; however, there is usually one optimal image guidance modality for each procedure and individual patient. We describe our patient-centered workflow as a model of care that incorporates state-of-the-art imaging techniques, up-to-date evidence, and value-based practices with the intent of optimizing procedural success and outcomes at a patient-specific level. This model contrasts interventionalist- and imaging modality-centered practices, where procedures are performed based on local preference and selective availability of imaging modality or interventionalists. We discuss rationales, benefits, and limitations of fluoroscopy, ultrasound, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging procedure guidance for a broad range of image-guided MSK interventions to diagnose and treat sports and tumor-related conditions.
AB - The spectrum of effective musculoskeletal (MSK) interventions is broadening and rapidly evolving. Increasing demands incite a perpetual need to optimize services and interventions by maximizing the diagnostic and therapeutic yield, reducing exposure to ionizing radiation, increasing cost efficiency, as well as identifying and promoting effective procedures to excel in patient satisfaction ratings and outcomes. MSK interventions for the treatment of oncological conditions, and conditions related to sports injury can be performed with different imaging modalities; however, there is usually one optimal image guidance modality for each procedure and individual patient. We describe our patient-centered workflow as a model of care that incorporates state-of-the-art imaging techniques, up-to-date evidence, and value-based practices with the intent of optimizing procedural success and outcomes at a patient-specific level. This model contrasts interventionalist- and imaging modality-centered practices, where procedures are performed based on local preference and selective availability of imaging modality or interventionalists. We discuss rationales, benefits, and limitations of fluoroscopy, ultrasound, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging procedure guidance for a broad range of image-guided MSK interventions to diagnose and treat sports and tumor-related conditions.
KW - computed tomography
KW - intervention
KW - magnetic resonance imaging guidance
KW - sports
KW - tumor
KW - ultrasound
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85092031026&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85092031026&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1055/s-0040-1710065
DO - 10.1055/s-0040-1710065
M3 - Article
C2 - 32987427
AN - SCOPUS:85092031026
SN - 1089-7860
VL - 24
SP - 290
EP - 309
JO - Seminars in Musculoskeletal Radiology
JF - Seminars in Musculoskeletal Radiology
IS - 3
ER -