Identifying Patterns of Coaching to Support the Implementation of the Good Behavior Game: The Role of Teacher Characteristics

Elise Touris Pas, Catherine P. Bradshaw, Kimberly D. Becker, Celene Domitrovich, Juliette Berg, Rashelle Jean Musci, Nicholas S Ialongo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

There is growing interest in coaching to support teacher implementation of evidence-based interventions; yet, there is limited research examining the tailoring of coaching support to teachers’ needs. This paper examined coaching dosage across one school year, and the relationship between coaching contacts and teacher baseline and end-of-year data. Data came from a randomized controlled trial including 210 teachers in 18 schools implementing the Good Behavior Game (GBG), either as a stand alone or when integrated with a social–emotional learning curriculum. The overarching goal was to determine whether coaches provided varying levels of teacher contacts and how this support related to condition assignment, implementation, and teachers’ beliefs and perceptions data. Growth mixture modeling (GMM) was used to examine the frequency of teacher contacts across the school year. GMM indicated three distinct patterns: about 58 % of teachers received a moderate number of contacts; 27 % received a consistently low number of contacts; and 15 % received high and increasing support. Teachers who received a high degree of support were more often implementing the integrated GBG and reported more negative beliefs and perceptions at the start of the school year than those in the low contact class. Teachers in the low contact class implemented the least number of games and minutes of GBG, but reported better perceptions of organizational health and burnout, at the end of the year. Coaching dosage was unrelated to observer ratings of implementation quality.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)61-73
Number of pages13
JournalSchool Mental Health
Volume7
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2015

Fingerprint

coaching
teacher
contact
school
Growth
Curriculum
Mentoring
Randomized Controlled Trials
Learning
burnout
coach
Health
Research
rating
curriculum

Keywords

  • Good Behavior Game
  • Implementation of evidence-based interventions
  • Preventive intervention
  • Teacher coaching

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Education

Cite this

Identifying Patterns of Coaching to Support the Implementation of the Good Behavior Game : The Role of Teacher Characteristics. / Pas, Elise Touris; Bradshaw, Catherine P.; Becker, Kimberly D.; Domitrovich, Celene; Berg, Juliette; Musci, Rashelle Jean; Ialongo, Nicholas S.

In: School Mental Health, Vol. 7, No. 1, 2015, p. 61-73.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f285e2812def4f048284be799e0675cc,
title = "Identifying Patterns of Coaching to Support the Implementation of the Good Behavior Game: The Role of Teacher Characteristics",
abstract = "There is growing interest in coaching to support teacher implementation of evidence-based interventions; yet, there is limited research examining the tailoring of coaching support to teachers’ needs. This paper examined coaching dosage across one school year, and the relationship between coaching contacts and teacher baseline and end-of-year data. Data came from a randomized controlled trial including 210 teachers in 18 schools implementing the Good Behavior Game (GBG), either as a stand alone or when integrated with a social–emotional learning curriculum. The overarching goal was to determine whether coaches provided varying levels of teacher contacts and how this support related to condition assignment, implementation, and teachers’ beliefs and perceptions data. Growth mixture modeling (GMM) was used to examine the frequency of teacher contacts across the school year. GMM indicated three distinct patterns: about 58 {\%} of teachers received a moderate number of contacts; 27 {\%} received a consistently low number of contacts; and 15 {\%} received high and increasing support. Teachers who received a high degree of support were more often implementing the integrated GBG and reported more negative beliefs and perceptions at the start of the school year than those in the low contact class. Teachers in the low contact class implemented the least number of games and minutes of GBG, but reported better perceptions of organizational health and burnout, at the end of the year. Coaching dosage was unrelated to observer ratings of implementation quality.",
keywords = "Good Behavior Game, Implementation of evidence-based interventions, Preventive intervention, Teacher coaching",
author = "Pas, {Elise Touris} and Bradshaw, {Catherine P.} and Becker, {Kimberly D.} and Celene Domitrovich and Juliette Berg and Musci, {Rashelle Jean} and Ialongo, {Nicholas S}",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1007/s12310-015-9145-0",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
pages = "61--73",
journal = "School Mental Health",
issn = "1866-2625",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Identifying Patterns of Coaching to Support the Implementation of the Good Behavior Game

T2 - The Role of Teacher Characteristics

AU - Pas, Elise Touris

AU - Bradshaw, Catherine P.

AU - Becker, Kimberly D.

AU - Domitrovich, Celene

AU - Berg, Juliette

AU - Musci, Rashelle Jean

AU - Ialongo, Nicholas S

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - There is growing interest in coaching to support teacher implementation of evidence-based interventions; yet, there is limited research examining the tailoring of coaching support to teachers’ needs. This paper examined coaching dosage across one school year, and the relationship between coaching contacts and teacher baseline and end-of-year data. Data came from a randomized controlled trial including 210 teachers in 18 schools implementing the Good Behavior Game (GBG), either as a stand alone or when integrated with a social–emotional learning curriculum. The overarching goal was to determine whether coaches provided varying levels of teacher contacts and how this support related to condition assignment, implementation, and teachers’ beliefs and perceptions data. Growth mixture modeling (GMM) was used to examine the frequency of teacher contacts across the school year. GMM indicated three distinct patterns: about 58 % of teachers received a moderate number of contacts; 27 % received a consistently low number of contacts; and 15 % received high and increasing support. Teachers who received a high degree of support were more often implementing the integrated GBG and reported more negative beliefs and perceptions at the start of the school year than those in the low contact class. Teachers in the low contact class implemented the least number of games and minutes of GBG, but reported better perceptions of organizational health and burnout, at the end of the year. Coaching dosage was unrelated to observer ratings of implementation quality.

AB - There is growing interest in coaching to support teacher implementation of evidence-based interventions; yet, there is limited research examining the tailoring of coaching support to teachers’ needs. This paper examined coaching dosage across one school year, and the relationship between coaching contacts and teacher baseline and end-of-year data. Data came from a randomized controlled trial including 210 teachers in 18 schools implementing the Good Behavior Game (GBG), either as a stand alone or when integrated with a social–emotional learning curriculum. The overarching goal was to determine whether coaches provided varying levels of teacher contacts and how this support related to condition assignment, implementation, and teachers’ beliefs and perceptions data. Growth mixture modeling (GMM) was used to examine the frequency of teacher contacts across the school year. GMM indicated three distinct patterns: about 58 % of teachers received a moderate number of contacts; 27 % received a consistently low number of contacts; and 15 % received high and increasing support. Teachers who received a high degree of support were more often implementing the integrated GBG and reported more negative beliefs and perceptions at the start of the school year than those in the low contact class. Teachers in the low contact class implemented the least number of games and minutes of GBG, but reported better perceptions of organizational health and burnout, at the end of the year. Coaching dosage was unrelated to observer ratings of implementation quality.

KW - Good Behavior Game

KW - Implementation of evidence-based interventions

KW - Preventive intervention

KW - Teacher coaching

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84926427938&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84926427938&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s12310-015-9145-0

DO - 10.1007/s12310-015-9145-0

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84926427938

VL - 7

SP - 61

EP - 73

JO - School Mental Health

JF - School Mental Health

SN - 1866-2625

IS - 1

ER -