Identifying Meaningful Outcome Measures for the Intensive Care Unit

Elizabeth A. Martinez, Karen Donelan, Justin P. Henneman, Sean Berenholtz, Paola D. Miralles, Allison E. Krug, Lisa I. Iezzoni, Jonathan E. Charnin, Peter J. Pronovost

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Despite important progress in measuring the safety of health care delivery in a variety of health care settings, a comprehensive set of metrics for benchmarking is still lacking, especially for patient outcomes. Even in high-risk settings where similar procedures are performed daily, such as hospital intensive care units (ICUs), these measures largely do not exist. Yet we cannot compare safety or quality across institutions or regions, nor can we track whether safety is improving over time. To a large extent, ICU outcome measures deemed valid, important, and preventable by clinicians are unavailable, and abstracting clinical data from the medical record is excessively burdensome. Even if a set of outcomes garnered consensus, ensuring adequate risk adjustment to facilitate fair comparisons across institutions presents another challenge. This study reports on a consensus process to build 5 outcome measures for broad use to evaluate the quality of ICU care and inform quality improvement efforts.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)144-152
Number of pages9
JournalAmerican Journal of Medical Quality
Volume29
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Intensive Care Units
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Safety
Delivery of Health Care
Risk Adjustment
Benchmarking
Quality of Health Care
Quality Improvement
Medical Records

Keywords

  • adverse outcomes
  • intensive care unit
  • outcome measures
  • outcomes
  • patient safety
  • quality measurement

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Martinez, E. A., Donelan, K., Henneman, J. P., Berenholtz, S., Miralles, P. D., Krug, A. E., ... Pronovost, P. J. (2014). Identifying Meaningful Outcome Measures for the Intensive Care Unit. American Journal of Medical Quality, 29(2), 144-152. https://doi.org/10.1177/1062860613491823

Identifying Meaningful Outcome Measures for the Intensive Care Unit. / Martinez, Elizabeth A.; Donelan, Karen; Henneman, Justin P.; Berenholtz, Sean; Miralles, Paola D.; Krug, Allison E.; Iezzoni, Lisa I.; Charnin, Jonathan E.; Pronovost, Peter J.

In: American Journal of Medical Quality, Vol. 29, No. 2, 2014, p. 144-152.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Martinez, EA, Donelan, K, Henneman, JP, Berenholtz, S, Miralles, PD, Krug, AE, Iezzoni, LI, Charnin, JE & Pronovost, PJ 2014, 'Identifying Meaningful Outcome Measures for the Intensive Care Unit', American Journal of Medical Quality, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 144-152. https://doi.org/10.1177/1062860613491823
Martinez, Elizabeth A. ; Donelan, Karen ; Henneman, Justin P. ; Berenholtz, Sean ; Miralles, Paola D. ; Krug, Allison E. ; Iezzoni, Lisa I. ; Charnin, Jonathan E. ; Pronovost, Peter J. / Identifying Meaningful Outcome Measures for the Intensive Care Unit. In: American Journal of Medical Quality. 2014 ; Vol. 29, No. 2. pp. 144-152.
@article{6d9a2d93b28949f486918c265a7eaf51,
title = "Identifying Meaningful Outcome Measures for the Intensive Care Unit",
abstract = "Despite important progress in measuring the safety of health care delivery in a variety of health care settings, a comprehensive set of metrics for benchmarking is still lacking, especially for patient outcomes. Even in high-risk settings where similar procedures are performed daily, such as hospital intensive care units (ICUs), these measures largely do not exist. Yet we cannot compare safety or quality across institutions or regions, nor can we track whether safety is improving over time. To a large extent, ICU outcome measures deemed valid, important, and preventable by clinicians are unavailable, and abstracting clinical data from the medical record is excessively burdensome. Even if a set of outcomes garnered consensus, ensuring adequate risk adjustment to facilitate fair comparisons across institutions presents another challenge. This study reports on a consensus process to build 5 outcome measures for broad use to evaluate the quality of ICU care and inform quality improvement efforts.",
keywords = "adverse outcomes, intensive care unit, outcome measures, outcomes, patient safety, quality measurement",
author = "Martinez, {Elizabeth A.} and Karen Donelan and Henneman, {Justin P.} and Sean Berenholtz and Miralles, {Paola D.} and Krug, {Allison E.} and Iezzoni, {Lisa I.} and Charnin, {Jonathan E.} and Pronovost, {Peter J.}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1177/1062860613491823",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "144--152",
journal = "American Journal of Medical Quality",
issn = "1062-8606",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Identifying Meaningful Outcome Measures for the Intensive Care Unit

AU - Martinez, Elizabeth A.

AU - Donelan, Karen

AU - Henneman, Justin P.

AU - Berenholtz, Sean

AU - Miralles, Paola D.

AU - Krug, Allison E.

AU - Iezzoni, Lisa I.

AU - Charnin, Jonathan E.

AU - Pronovost, Peter J.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Despite important progress in measuring the safety of health care delivery in a variety of health care settings, a comprehensive set of metrics for benchmarking is still lacking, especially for patient outcomes. Even in high-risk settings where similar procedures are performed daily, such as hospital intensive care units (ICUs), these measures largely do not exist. Yet we cannot compare safety or quality across institutions or regions, nor can we track whether safety is improving over time. To a large extent, ICU outcome measures deemed valid, important, and preventable by clinicians are unavailable, and abstracting clinical data from the medical record is excessively burdensome. Even if a set of outcomes garnered consensus, ensuring adequate risk adjustment to facilitate fair comparisons across institutions presents another challenge. This study reports on a consensus process to build 5 outcome measures for broad use to evaluate the quality of ICU care and inform quality improvement efforts.

AB - Despite important progress in measuring the safety of health care delivery in a variety of health care settings, a comprehensive set of metrics for benchmarking is still lacking, especially for patient outcomes. Even in high-risk settings where similar procedures are performed daily, such as hospital intensive care units (ICUs), these measures largely do not exist. Yet we cannot compare safety or quality across institutions or regions, nor can we track whether safety is improving over time. To a large extent, ICU outcome measures deemed valid, important, and preventable by clinicians are unavailable, and abstracting clinical data from the medical record is excessively burdensome. Even if a set of outcomes garnered consensus, ensuring adequate risk adjustment to facilitate fair comparisons across institutions presents another challenge. This study reports on a consensus process to build 5 outcome measures for broad use to evaluate the quality of ICU care and inform quality improvement efforts.

KW - adverse outcomes

KW - intensive care unit

KW - outcome measures

KW - outcomes

KW - patient safety

KW - quality measurement

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84897723617&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84897723617&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1062860613491823

DO - 10.1177/1062860613491823

M3 - Article

C2 - 23892372

AN - SCOPUS:84897723617

VL - 29

SP - 144

EP - 152

JO - American Journal of Medical Quality

JF - American Journal of Medical Quality

SN - 1062-8606

IS - 2

ER -