Identification of clusters of individuals relevant to temporomandibular disorders and other chronic pain conditions: The OPPERA study

Eric Bair, Sheila Gaynor, Gary D. Slade, Richard Ohrbach, Roger B. Fillingim, Joel Daniel Greenspan, Ronald Dubner, Shad B. Smith, Luda Diatchenko, William Maixner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The classification of most chronic pain disorders gives emphasis to anatomical location of the pain to distinguish one disorder from the other (eg, back pain vs temporomandibular disorder [TMD]) or to define subtypes (eg, TMD myalgia vs arthralgia). However, anatomical criteria overlook etiology, potentially hampering treatment decisions. This study identified clusters of individuals using a comprehensive array of biopsychosocial measures. Data were collected from a case-control study of 1031 chronic TMD cases and 3247 TMD-free controls. Three subgroups were identified using supervised cluster analysis (referred to as the adaptive, pain-sensitive, and global symptoms clusters). Compared with the adaptive cluster, participants in the pain-sensitive cluster showed heightened sensitivity to experimental pain, and participants in the global symptoms cluster showed both greater pain sensitivity and greater psychological distress. Cluster membership was strongly associated with chronic TMD: 91.5% of TMD cases belonged to the pain-sensitive and global symptoms clusters, whereas 41.2% of controls belonged to the adaptive cluster. Temporomandibular disorder cases in the pain-sensitive and global symptoms clusters also showed greater pain intensity, jaw functional limitation, and more comorbid pain conditions. Similar results were obtained when the same methodology was applied to a smaller case-control study consisting of 199 chronic TMD cases and 201 TMD-free controls. During a median 3-year follow-up period of TMD-free individuals, participants in the global symptoms cluster had greater risk of developing first-onset TMD (hazard ratio 2.8) compared with participants in the other 2 clusters. Cross-cohort predictive modeling was used to demonstrate the reliability of the clusters.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1266-1278
Number of pages13
JournalPain
Volume157
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
Chronic Pain
Pain
Case-Control Studies
Somatoform Disorders
Myalgia
Arthralgia
Back Pain
Jaw
Cluster Analysis

Keywords

  • Classification of chronic pain
  • Clustering
  • Temporomandibular disorders

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
  • Neurology
  • Pharmacology

Cite this

Identification of clusters of individuals relevant to temporomandibular disorders and other chronic pain conditions : The OPPERA study. / Bair, Eric; Gaynor, Sheila; Slade, Gary D.; Ohrbach, Richard; Fillingim, Roger B.; Greenspan, Joel Daniel; Dubner, Ronald; Smith, Shad B.; Diatchenko, Luda; Maixner, William.

In: Pain, Vol. 157, No. 6, 01.06.2016, p. 1266-1278.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bair, E, Gaynor, S, Slade, GD, Ohrbach, R, Fillingim, RB, Greenspan, JD, Dubner, R, Smith, SB, Diatchenko, L & Maixner, W 2016, 'Identification of clusters of individuals relevant to temporomandibular disorders and other chronic pain conditions: The OPPERA study', Pain, vol. 157, no. 6, pp. 1266-1278. https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000518
Bair, Eric ; Gaynor, Sheila ; Slade, Gary D. ; Ohrbach, Richard ; Fillingim, Roger B. ; Greenspan, Joel Daniel ; Dubner, Ronald ; Smith, Shad B. ; Diatchenko, Luda ; Maixner, William. / Identification of clusters of individuals relevant to temporomandibular disorders and other chronic pain conditions : The OPPERA study. In: Pain. 2016 ; Vol. 157, No. 6. pp. 1266-1278.
@article{3349bfe8ca7743afb38f823a5fb16494,
title = "Identification of clusters of individuals relevant to temporomandibular disorders and other chronic pain conditions: The OPPERA study",
abstract = "The classification of most chronic pain disorders gives emphasis to anatomical location of the pain to distinguish one disorder from the other (eg, back pain vs temporomandibular disorder [TMD]) or to define subtypes (eg, TMD myalgia vs arthralgia). However, anatomical criteria overlook etiology, potentially hampering treatment decisions. This study identified clusters of individuals using a comprehensive array of biopsychosocial measures. Data were collected from a case-control study of 1031 chronic TMD cases and 3247 TMD-free controls. Three subgroups were identified using supervised cluster analysis (referred to as the adaptive, pain-sensitive, and global symptoms clusters). Compared with the adaptive cluster, participants in the pain-sensitive cluster showed heightened sensitivity to experimental pain, and participants in the global symptoms cluster showed both greater pain sensitivity and greater psychological distress. Cluster membership was strongly associated with chronic TMD: 91.5{\%} of TMD cases belonged to the pain-sensitive and global symptoms clusters, whereas 41.2{\%} of controls belonged to the adaptive cluster. Temporomandibular disorder cases in the pain-sensitive and global symptoms clusters also showed greater pain intensity, jaw functional limitation, and more comorbid pain conditions. Similar results were obtained when the same methodology was applied to a smaller case-control study consisting of 199 chronic TMD cases and 201 TMD-free controls. During a median 3-year follow-up period of TMD-free individuals, participants in the global symptoms cluster had greater risk of developing first-onset TMD (hazard ratio 2.8) compared with participants in the other 2 clusters. Cross-cohort predictive modeling was used to demonstrate the reliability of the clusters.",
keywords = "Classification of chronic pain, Clustering, Temporomandibular disorders",
author = "Eric Bair and Sheila Gaynor and Slade, {Gary D.} and Richard Ohrbach and Fillingim, {Roger B.} and Greenspan, {Joel Daniel} and Ronald Dubner and Smith, {Shad B.} and Luda Diatchenko and William Maixner",
year = "2016",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000518",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "157",
pages = "1266--1278",
journal = "Pain",
issn = "0304-3959",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Identification of clusters of individuals relevant to temporomandibular disorders and other chronic pain conditions

T2 - The OPPERA study

AU - Bair, Eric

AU - Gaynor, Sheila

AU - Slade, Gary D.

AU - Ohrbach, Richard

AU - Fillingim, Roger B.

AU - Greenspan, Joel Daniel

AU - Dubner, Ronald

AU - Smith, Shad B.

AU - Diatchenko, Luda

AU - Maixner, William

PY - 2016/6/1

Y1 - 2016/6/1

N2 - The classification of most chronic pain disorders gives emphasis to anatomical location of the pain to distinguish one disorder from the other (eg, back pain vs temporomandibular disorder [TMD]) or to define subtypes (eg, TMD myalgia vs arthralgia). However, anatomical criteria overlook etiology, potentially hampering treatment decisions. This study identified clusters of individuals using a comprehensive array of biopsychosocial measures. Data were collected from a case-control study of 1031 chronic TMD cases and 3247 TMD-free controls. Three subgroups were identified using supervised cluster analysis (referred to as the adaptive, pain-sensitive, and global symptoms clusters). Compared with the adaptive cluster, participants in the pain-sensitive cluster showed heightened sensitivity to experimental pain, and participants in the global symptoms cluster showed both greater pain sensitivity and greater psychological distress. Cluster membership was strongly associated with chronic TMD: 91.5% of TMD cases belonged to the pain-sensitive and global symptoms clusters, whereas 41.2% of controls belonged to the adaptive cluster. Temporomandibular disorder cases in the pain-sensitive and global symptoms clusters also showed greater pain intensity, jaw functional limitation, and more comorbid pain conditions. Similar results were obtained when the same methodology was applied to a smaller case-control study consisting of 199 chronic TMD cases and 201 TMD-free controls. During a median 3-year follow-up period of TMD-free individuals, participants in the global symptoms cluster had greater risk of developing first-onset TMD (hazard ratio 2.8) compared with participants in the other 2 clusters. Cross-cohort predictive modeling was used to demonstrate the reliability of the clusters.

AB - The classification of most chronic pain disorders gives emphasis to anatomical location of the pain to distinguish one disorder from the other (eg, back pain vs temporomandibular disorder [TMD]) or to define subtypes (eg, TMD myalgia vs arthralgia). However, anatomical criteria overlook etiology, potentially hampering treatment decisions. This study identified clusters of individuals using a comprehensive array of biopsychosocial measures. Data were collected from a case-control study of 1031 chronic TMD cases and 3247 TMD-free controls. Three subgroups were identified using supervised cluster analysis (referred to as the adaptive, pain-sensitive, and global symptoms clusters). Compared with the adaptive cluster, participants in the pain-sensitive cluster showed heightened sensitivity to experimental pain, and participants in the global symptoms cluster showed both greater pain sensitivity and greater psychological distress. Cluster membership was strongly associated with chronic TMD: 91.5% of TMD cases belonged to the pain-sensitive and global symptoms clusters, whereas 41.2% of controls belonged to the adaptive cluster. Temporomandibular disorder cases in the pain-sensitive and global symptoms clusters also showed greater pain intensity, jaw functional limitation, and more comorbid pain conditions. Similar results were obtained when the same methodology was applied to a smaller case-control study consisting of 199 chronic TMD cases and 201 TMD-free controls. During a median 3-year follow-up period of TMD-free individuals, participants in the global symptoms cluster had greater risk of developing first-onset TMD (hazard ratio 2.8) compared with participants in the other 2 clusters. Cross-cohort predictive modeling was used to demonstrate the reliability of the clusters.

KW - Classification of chronic pain

KW - Clustering

KW - Temporomandibular disorders

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84971287285&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84971287285&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000518

DO - 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000518

M3 - Article

C2 - 26928952

AN - SCOPUS:84971287285

VL - 157

SP - 1266

EP - 1278

JO - Pain

JF - Pain

SN - 0304-3959

IS - 6

ER -