ICU early mobilization

From recommendation to implementation at three medical centers

Heidi J. Engel, Dale Needham, Peter E. Morris, Michael A. Gropper

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: To compare and contrast the process used to implement an early mobility program in ICUs at three different medical centers and to assess their impact on clinical outcomes in critically ill patients. Design: Three ICU early mobilization quality improvement projects are summarized utilizing the Institute for Healthcare Improvement framework of Plan-Do-Study-Act. INTERVENTION:: Each of the three ICU early mobilization programs required an interprofessional team-based approach to plan, educate, and implement the ICU early mobility program. Champions from each profession-nursing, physical therapy, physician, and respiratory care-were identified to facilitate changes in ICU culture and clinical practice and to identify and address barriers to early mobility program implementation at each institution. Setting: The medical ICU at Wake Forest University, the medical ICU at Johns Hopkins Hospital, and the mixed medical-surgical ICU at the University of California San Francisco Medical Center. Results: Establishing an ICU early mobilization quality improvement program resulted in a reduced ICU and hospital length of stay at all three institutions and decreased rates of delirium and the need for sedation for the patients enrolled in the Johns Hopkins ICU early mobility program. Conclusion: Instituting a planned, structured ICU early mobility quality improvement project can result in improved outcomes and reduced costs for ICU patients across healthcare systems.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalCritical Care Medicine
Volume41
Issue number9 SUPPL.1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2013

Fingerprint

Early Ambulation
Quality Improvement
Length of Stay
Delivery of Health Care
Respiratory Therapy
San Francisco
Delirium
Critical Illness
Nursing
Physicians
Costs and Cost Analysis

Keywords

  • barriers
  • critical care
  • early mobility
  • early mobilization
  • ICU-acquired weakness
  • interprofessional
  • outcomes
  • physical rehabilitation
  • quality improvement

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cite this

ICU early mobilization : From recommendation to implementation at three medical centers. / Engel, Heidi J.; Needham, Dale; Morris, Peter E.; Gropper, Michael A.

In: Critical Care Medicine, Vol. 41, No. 9 SUPPL.1, 2013.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Engel, Heidi J. ; Needham, Dale ; Morris, Peter E. ; Gropper, Michael A. / ICU early mobilization : From recommendation to implementation at three medical centers. In: Critical Care Medicine. 2013 ; Vol. 41, No. 9 SUPPL.1.
@article{f3015da7010e4161a342669baa9b3a50,
title = "ICU early mobilization: From recommendation to implementation at three medical centers",
abstract = "Objective: To compare and contrast the process used to implement an early mobility program in ICUs at three different medical centers and to assess their impact on clinical outcomes in critically ill patients. Design: Three ICU early mobilization quality improvement projects are summarized utilizing the Institute for Healthcare Improvement framework of Plan-Do-Study-Act. INTERVENTION:: Each of the three ICU early mobilization programs required an interprofessional team-based approach to plan, educate, and implement the ICU early mobility program. Champions from each profession-nursing, physical therapy, physician, and respiratory care-were identified to facilitate changes in ICU culture and clinical practice and to identify and address barriers to early mobility program implementation at each institution. Setting: The medical ICU at Wake Forest University, the medical ICU at Johns Hopkins Hospital, and the mixed medical-surgical ICU at the University of California San Francisco Medical Center. Results: Establishing an ICU early mobilization quality improvement program resulted in a reduced ICU and hospital length of stay at all three institutions and decreased rates of delirium and the need for sedation for the patients enrolled in the Johns Hopkins ICU early mobility program. Conclusion: Instituting a planned, structured ICU early mobility quality improvement project can result in improved outcomes and reduced costs for ICU patients across healthcare systems.",
keywords = "barriers, critical care, early mobility, early mobilization, ICU-acquired weakness, interprofessional, outcomes, physical rehabilitation, quality improvement",
author = "Engel, {Heidi J.} and Dale Needham and Morris, {Peter E.} and Gropper, {Michael A.}",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182a240d5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "41",
journal = "Critical Care Medicine",
issn = "0090-3493",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "9 SUPPL.1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - ICU early mobilization

T2 - From recommendation to implementation at three medical centers

AU - Engel, Heidi J.

AU - Needham, Dale

AU - Morris, Peter E.

AU - Gropper, Michael A.

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Objective: To compare and contrast the process used to implement an early mobility program in ICUs at three different medical centers and to assess their impact on clinical outcomes in critically ill patients. Design: Three ICU early mobilization quality improvement projects are summarized utilizing the Institute for Healthcare Improvement framework of Plan-Do-Study-Act. INTERVENTION:: Each of the three ICU early mobilization programs required an interprofessional team-based approach to plan, educate, and implement the ICU early mobility program. Champions from each profession-nursing, physical therapy, physician, and respiratory care-were identified to facilitate changes in ICU culture and clinical practice and to identify and address barriers to early mobility program implementation at each institution. Setting: The medical ICU at Wake Forest University, the medical ICU at Johns Hopkins Hospital, and the mixed medical-surgical ICU at the University of California San Francisco Medical Center. Results: Establishing an ICU early mobilization quality improvement program resulted in a reduced ICU and hospital length of stay at all three institutions and decreased rates of delirium and the need for sedation for the patients enrolled in the Johns Hopkins ICU early mobility program. Conclusion: Instituting a planned, structured ICU early mobility quality improvement project can result in improved outcomes and reduced costs for ICU patients across healthcare systems.

AB - Objective: To compare and contrast the process used to implement an early mobility program in ICUs at three different medical centers and to assess their impact on clinical outcomes in critically ill patients. Design: Three ICU early mobilization quality improvement projects are summarized utilizing the Institute for Healthcare Improvement framework of Plan-Do-Study-Act. INTERVENTION:: Each of the three ICU early mobilization programs required an interprofessional team-based approach to plan, educate, and implement the ICU early mobility program. Champions from each profession-nursing, physical therapy, physician, and respiratory care-were identified to facilitate changes in ICU culture and clinical practice and to identify and address barriers to early mobility program implementation at each institution. Setting: The medical ICU at Wake Forest University, the medical ICU at Johns Hopkins Hospital, and the mixed medical-surgical ICU at the University of California San Francisco Medical Center. Results: Establishing an ICU early mobilization quality improvement program resulted in a reduced ICU and hospital length of stay at all three institutions and decreased rates of delirium and the need for sedation for the patients enrolled in the Johns Hopkins ICU early mobility program. Conclusion: Instituting a planned, structured ICU early mobility quality improvement project can result in improved outcomes and reduced costs for ICU patients across healthcare systems.

KW - barriers

KW - critical care

KW - early mobility

KW - early mobilization

KW - ICU-acquired weakness

KW - interprofessional

KW - outcomes

KW - physical rehabilitation

KW - quality improvement

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84883575336&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84883575336&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182a240d5

DO - 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182a240d5

M3 - Article

VL - 41

JO - Critical Care Medicine

JF - Critical Care Medicine

SN - 0090-3493

IS - 9 SUPPL.1

ER -