Human Vestibulo-Ocular Reflex Adaptation Reduces when Training Demand Variability Increases

One component of vestibular rehabilitation in patients with vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) hypofunction is gaze-stabilizing exercises that seek to increase (adapt) the VOR response. These prescribed home-based exercises are performed by the patient and thus their use/training is inherently variable. We sought to determine whether this variability affected VOR adaptation in ten healthy controls (× 2 training only) and ten patients with unilateral vestibular hypofunction (× 1 and × 2 training). During × 1 training, patients actively (self-generated, predictable) move their head sinusoidally while viewing a stationary fixation target; for × 2 training, they moved their outstretched hand anti-phase with their head rotation while attempting to view a handheld target. We defined the latter as manual × 2 training because the subject manually controls the target. In this study, head rotation frequency during training incrementally increased 0.5–2 Hz over 20 min. Active and passive (imposed, unpredictable) sinusoidal (1.3-Hz rotations) and head impulse VOR gains were measured before and after training. We show that for controls, manual × 2 training resulted in significant sinusoidal and impulse VOR adaptation of ~ 6 % and ~ 3 %, respectively, though this was ~two-thirds lower than increases after computer-controlled × 2 training (non-variable) reported in a prior study. In contrast, for patients, there was an increase in impulse but not sinusoidal VOR response after a single session of manual × 2 training. Patients had more than double the variability in VOR demand during manual × 2 training compared to controls, which could explain why adaptation was not significant in patients. Our data suggest that the clinical × 1 gaze-stabilizing exercise is a weak stimulus for VOR adaptation.