Human progressive-ratio performance

Maintenance by pentobarbital

Daniel R. McLeod, Roland R Griffiths

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Within a residential research ward, five human volunteers with histories of sedative drug abuse were exposed to progressive-ratio schedules of pentobarbital (200, 400, 600 mg) or placebo self-administration. All doses were letter-coded and administered under double-blind conditions. To obtain a single letter-coded dose, three subjects were required to press a set of buttons a specified number of times and two subjects were required to ride a stationary bicycle for a specified period of time. Only one dose could be obtained per day and the button-pressing or riding requirement for each letter-coded dose was increased over successive sessions until subjects failed to meet the progressive-ratio requirement (i.e., the subject chose not to work for the dose). Drug-effect ratings and subjective measures were taken 2 h after drug administration. Pentobarbital maintained dose-related increases in the maximum progressive-ratio requirement completed, the subject and staff ratings of drug effect, the subject ratings of drug 'liking', and the scores on the PCAG scale of the Addiction Research Center Inventory. The present study suggests that progressive-ratio schedules are sensitive and valid procedures for providing information about the relative reinforcing efficacy of drugs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)4-9
Number of pages6
JournalPsychopharmacology
Volume79
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1983

Fingerprint

Pentobarbital
Maintenance
Pharmaceutical Preparations
Appointments and Schedules
Self Administration
Hypnotics and Sedatives
Research
Substance-Related Disorders
Volunteers
Placebos
Equipment and Supplies

Keywords

  • Button press
  • Drug abusers
  • Drug self-administration
  • Fixed-ratio schedule
  • Humans
  • Pentobarbital
  • Progressive-ratio schedule
  • Reinforcing efficacy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pharmacology

Cite this

Human progressive-ratio performance : Maintenance by pentobarbital. / McLeod, Daniel R.; Griffiths, Roland R.

In: Psychopharmacology, Vol. 79, No. 1, 01.1983, p. 4-9.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8dafe544cf7e4fe68e8a260cb7b6e97f,
title = "Human progressive-ratio performance: Maintenance by pentobarbital",
abstract = "Within a residential research ward, five human volunteers with histories of sedative drug abuse were exposed to progressive-ratio schedules of pentobarbital (200, 400, 600 mg) or placebo self-administration. All doses were letter-coded and administered under double-blind conditions. To obtain a single letter-coded dose, three subjects were required to press a set of buttons a specified number of times and two subjects were required to ride a stationary bicycle for a specified period of time. Only one dose could be obtained per day and the button-pressing or riding requirement for each letter-coded dose was increased over successive sessions until subjects failed to meet the progressive-ratio requirement (i.e., the subject chose not to work for the dose). Drug-effect ratings and subjective measures were taken 2 h after drug administration. Pentobarbital maintained dose-related increases in the maximum progressive-ratio requirement completed, the subject and staff ratings of drug effect, the subject ratings of drug 'liking', and the scores on the PCAG scale of the Addiction Research Center Inventory. The present study suggests that progressive-ratio schedules are sensitive and valid procedures for providing information about the relative reinforcing efficacy of drugs.",
keywords = "Button press, Drug abusers, Drug self-administration, Fixed-ratio schedule, Humans, Pentobarbital, Progressive-ratio schedule, Reinforcing efficacy",
author = "McLeod, {Daniel R.} and Griffiths, {Roland R}",
year = "1983",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1007/BF00433007",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "79",
pages = "4--9",
journal = "Psychopharmacology",
issn = "0033-3158",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Human progressive-ratio performance

T2 - Maintenance by pentobarbital

AU - McLeod, Daniel R.

AU - Griffiths, Roland R

PY - 1983/1

Y1 - 1983/1

N2 - Within a residential research ward, five human volunteers with histories of sedative drug abuse were exposed to progressive-ratio schedules of pentobarbital (200, 400, 600 mg) or placebo self-administration. All doses were letter-coded and administered under double-blind conditions. To obtain a single letter-coded dose, three subjects were required to press a set of buttons a specified number of times and two subjects were required to ride a stationary bicycle for a specified period of time. Only one dose could be obtained per day and the button-pressing or riding requirement for each letter-coded dose was increased over successive sessions until subjects failed to meet the progressive-ratio requirement (i.e., the subject chose not to work for the dose). Drug-effect ratings and subjective measures were taken 2 h after drug administration. Pentobarbital maintained dose-related increases in the maximum progressive-ratio requirement completed, the subject and staff ratings of drug effect, the subject ratings of drug 'liking', and the scores on the PCAG scale of the Addiction Research Center Inventory. The present study suggests that progressive-ratio schedules are sensitive and valid procedures for providing information about the relative reinforcing efficacy of drugs.

AB - Within a residential research ward, five human volunteers with histories of sedative drug abuse were exposed to progressive-ratio schedules of pentobarbital (200, 400, 600 mg) or placebo self-administration. All doses were letter-coded and administered under double-blind conditions. To obtain a single letter-coded dose, three subjects were required to press a set of buttons a specified number of times and two subjects were required to ride a stationary bicycle for a specified period of time. Only one dose could be obtained per day and the button-pressing or riding requirement for each letter-coded dose was increased over successive sessions until subjects failed to meet the progressive-ratio requirement (i.e., the subject chose not to work for the dose). Drug-effect ratings and subjective measures were taken 2 h after drug administration. Pentobarbital maintained dose-related increases in the maximum progressive-ratio requirement completed, the subject and staff ratings of drug effect, the subject ratings of drug 'liking', and the scores on the PCAG scale of the Addiction Research Center Inventory. The present study suggests that progressive-ratio schedules are sensitive and valid procedures for providing information about the relative reinforcing efficacy of drugs.

KW - Button press

KW - Drug abusers

KW - Drug self-administration

KW - Fixed-ratio schedule

KW - Humans

KW - Pentobarbital

KW - Progressive-ratio schedule

KW - Reinforcing efficacy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0020677361&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0020677361&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/BF00433007

DO - 10.1007/BF00433007

M3 - Article

VL - 79

SP - 4

EP - 9

JO - Psychopharmacology

JF - Psychopharmacology

SN - 0033-3158

IS - 1

ER -