TY - JOUR
T1 - HRSA-Funded MCH Pipeline Training Program
T2 - Advancing the MCH Pipeline and Workforce Through Research Collaborations
AU - Olaleye, Omonike A.
AU - Dongarwar, Deepa
AU - Salihu, Hamisu M.
AU - Adu-Gyamfi, Sylvia
AU - Kaur, Manvir
AU - Egbejimi, Anuoluwapo
AU - Moerchen, Victoria A.
AU - Belcher, Harolyn M.E.
AU - Holmes, Faye
AU - Kuo, Alice
AU - Copeland-Linder, Nikeea
AU - Noble, Charlotte A.
AU - Vamos, Cheryl A.
AU - Waters, Catrina R.
AU - Brown, Claudia M.
AU - Reddy, Madhavi M.
N1 - Funding Information:
OAA, HMS—Obtained the grant funding, conducted the MCH pipeline program and revised the manuscript. DD—drafted and revised the manuscript. SA-G, MK, AE, VAM, HMEB, FH, AK, NC-L, CAN, CAV, CRW, CB, MMR—revised and approved the manuscript
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, The Author(s).
PY - 2022/8
Y1 - 2022/8
N2 - Purpose: Presently, there are six undergraduate HRSA-funded MCH pipeline training programs (MCHPTP) in the nation and they have gained significant momentum since inception by recruiting, training and mentoring undergraduate students in a comprehensive MCH-focused approach. This article describes the outcomes from the 6 training programs; and primarily Baylor College of Medicine–Texas Southern University (BCM–TSU’s) collaborative strategy focusing on the MCH research training and outcomes, which align with HRSA’s MCH bureau’s missions. Description: Each MCHPTP offers trainees interdisciplinary MCH research experiences through intra/inter-institutional collaborations and partnerships, but BCM–TSU’s MCHPTP was the only one with the primary focus to be research. As a case study, the BCM–TSU Program developed an innovative research curriculum integrated with MCH Foundations Course that comprised 2 hour weekly meetings. Students were split into collaborative research groups of 4–5 students, with multidisciplinary peer-mentors, clinical fellows and MCH research faculty from institutions at the world—renowned Texas Medical Center. Assessment: Since the inception of the MCH mentorship programs, all six MCHPTPs have enrolled up to 1890 trainees and/or interns. BCM–TSU Program trainees are defined as undergraduate students in their 1st or 2nd year of college while research interns are upper classmen in their 3rd or 4th year of college. The case study showed that BCM–TSU Program trainees demonstrated outstanding accomplishments in the area of research through primary and co-authorships of 13 peer-reviewed journal publications by 78 trainees, over a period of 3 years, in addition to dozens of presentations at local, regional and national conferences. Conclusions: The research productivity of students in the six MCHPTPs is strongly indicative of the success of integrating MCH research mentoring into MCH didactic training. The development of a diverse and robust MCH mentorship program promotes and strengthens research activities in areas of high priority such as addressing health disparities in MCH morbidity and mortality in the U.S.
AB - Purpose: Presently, there are six undergraduate HRSA-funded MCH pipeline training programs (MCHPTP) in the nation and they have gained significant momentum since inception by recruiting, training and mentoring undergraduate students in a comprehensive MCH-focused approach. This article describes the outcomes from the 6 training programs; and primarily Baylor College of Medicine–Texas Southern University (BCM–TSU’s) collaborative strategy focusing on the MCH research training and outcomes, which align with HRSA’s MCH bureau’s missions. Description: Each MCHPTP offers trainees interdisciplinary MCH research experiences through intra/inter-institutional collaborations and partnerships, but BCM–TSU’s MCHPTP was the only one with the primary focus to be research. As a case study, the BCM–TSU Program developed an innovative research curriculum integrated with MCH Foundations Course that comprised 2 hour weekly meetings. Students were split into collaborative research groups of 4–5 students, with multidisciplinary peer-mentors, clinical fellows and MCH research faculty from institutions at the world—renowned Texas Medical Center. Assessment: Since the inception of the MCH mentorship programs, all six MCHPTPs have enrolled up to 1890 trainees and/or interns. BCM–TSU Program trainees are defined as undergraduate students in their 1st or 2nd year of college while research interns are upper classmen in their 3rd or 4th year of college. The case study showed that BCM–TSU Program trainees demonstrated outstanding accomplishments in the area of research through primary and co-authorships of 13 peer-reviewed journal publications by 78 trainees, over a period of 3 years, in addition to dozens of presentations at local, regional and national conferences. Conclusions: The research productivity of students in the six MCHPTPs is strongly indicative of the success of integrating MCH research mentoring into MCH didactic training. The development of a diverse and robust MCH mentorship program promotes and strengthens research activities in areas of high priority such as addressing health disparities in MCH morbidity and mortality in the U.S.
KW - MCH
KW - Maternal and child health
KW - Mentorship
KW - Pipeline program
KW - Research collaborations
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85133590688&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85133590688&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10995-022-03439-w
DO - 10.1007/s10995-022-03439-w
M3 - Article
C2 - 35796850
AN - SCOPUS:85133590688
SN - 1092-7875
VL - 26
SP - 147
EP - 155
JO - Maternal and child health journal
JF - Maternal and child health journal
ER -