Abstract
Peer review is a necessary and important component of scholarly publication. When done well, it benefits both the reviewer and authors and improves the science itself. However, the skills of effective peer review are rarely taught. In the adolescent field of medical education research, peer review is especially important to advance the scientific rigor of the field. From our experience reviewing biomedical and medical education research, we have found that a thorough review takes multiple readings and multiple hours. The first reading provides a general overview of the aims and methods. Subsequent readings focus on the details of the methodology, results, and interpretation. The written review should provide firm but gentle feedback that the authors can use to improve their work, even if we have recommended rejection for this submission. We hope that this description of our process for reviewing a medical education research manuscript will assist others and thereby advance the quality of publications in our field.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 38-47 |
Number of pages | 10 |
Journal | ATS Scholar |
Volume | 3 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Mar 2022 |
Keywords
- education
- peer review
- scholarship
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
- Clinical Neurology
- Education
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine