How to Review a Surgical Scientific Paper: A Guide for Critical Appraisal

Stephanie H. Greco; Catherine H. Davis; Caitlin W. Hicks; Alison E. Kaye; Jessica E. Maxwell; Arghavan Salles; Marion C.W. Henry

doi:10.1097/AS9.0000000000000027

How to Review a Surgical Scientific Paper: A Guide for Critical Appraisal

Stephanie H. Greco, Catherine H. Davis, Caitlin W. Hicks, Alison E. Kaye, Jessica E. Maxwell, Arghavan Salles, Marion C.W. Henry

School of Medicine

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

Abstract

It is important for surgeons to participate in the peer-review process of scientific literature. As the number of published manuscripts continues to increase, there is a great need for volunteerism in this arena. However, there is little formal or informal training, which can help surgeons provide unbiased and meaningful reviews. Therefore, it is critical to provide more resources and guidelines to aid surgeons during the review process. The purpose of this paper is to provide a structured guide for a quality review of a surgical paper. This review represents the work of the Association of Women Surgeons Publications Committee.

Original language	English (US)
Journal	Annals of surgery
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1097/AS9.0000000000000027
State	Accepted/In press - 2021

Keywords

critique
critique
review
review
surgical paper
surgical paper

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Surgery

Access to Document

10.1097/AS9.0000000000000027

Cite this

@article{b1864c091d26488c802c44c547159eae,

title = "How to Review a Surgical Scientific Paper: A Guide for Critical Appraisal",

abstract = "It is important for surgeons to participate in the peer-review process of scientific literature. As the number of published manuscripts continues to increase, there is a great need for volunteerism in this arena. However, there is little formal or informal training, which can help surgeons provide unbiased and meaningful reviews. Therefore, it is critical to provide more resources and guidelines to aid surgeons during the review process. The purpose of this paper is to provide a structured guide for a quality review of a surgical paper. This review represents the work of the Association of Women Surgeons Publications Committee.",

keywords = "critique, critique, review, review, surgical paper, surgical paper",

author = "Greco, {Stephanie H.} and Davis, {Catherine H.} and Hicks, {Caitlin W.} and Kaye, {Alison E.} and Maxwell, {Jessica E.} and Arghavan Salles and Henry, {Marion C.W.}",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2021 The Author(s).",

year = "2021",

doi = "10.1097/AS9.0000000000000027",

language = "English (US)",

journal = "Annals of surgery",

issn = "0003-4932",

publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - How to Review a Surgical Scientific Paper

T2 - A Guide for Critical Appraisal

AU - Greco, Stephanie H.

AU - Davis, Catherine H.

AU - Hicks, Caitlin W.

AU - Kaye, Alison E.

AU - Maxwell, Jessica E.

AU - Salles, Arghavan

AU - Henry, Marion C.W.

PY - 2021

Y1 - 2021

N2 - It is important for surgeons to participate in the peer-review process of scientific literature. As the number of published manuscripts continues to increase, there is a great need for volunteerism in this arena. However, there is little formal or informal training, which can help surgeons provide unbiased and meaningful reviews. Therefore, it is critical to provide more resources and guidelines to aid surgeons during the review process. The purpose of this paper is to provide a structured guide for a quality review of a surgical paper. This review represents the work of the Association of Women Surgeons Publications Committee.

AB - It is important for surgeons to participate in the peer-review process of scientific literature. As the number of published manuscripts continues to increase, there is a great need for volunteerism in this arena. However, there is little formal or informal training, which can help surgeons provide unbiased and meaningful reviews. Therefore, it is critical to provide more resources and guidelines to aid surgeons during the review process. The purpose of this paper is to provide a structured guide for a quality review of a surgical paper. This review represents the work of the Association of Women Surgeons Publications Committee.

KW - critique

KW - review

KW - surgical paper

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85105549214&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85105549214&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000027

DO - 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000027

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:85105549214

SN - 0003-4932

JO - Annals of surgery

JF - Annals of surgery

ER -

How to Review a Surgical Scientific Paper: A Guide for Critical Appraisal

Abstract

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this