How to improve results with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy

Michelle J. Semins, Brian Matlaga

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

Objective: Shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) has greatly revolutionized the treatment of patients suffering from stone disease. There are a number of patient- and device-specific factors that can affect treatment outcome. Herein, we review practices that can increase the likelihood of SWL treatment success. Methods: A systematic literature review was performed to identify studies of SWL treatment parameters. Results: Among the factors affecting the outcome of SWL were patient selection criteria, such as stone burden, stone location, and anatomic features. Additionally, technical aspects of the SWL procedure also can affect outcome; these factors include the acoustic output of the lithotripter, the coupling of the lithotripter to the patient, and the power, total number, and rate of shock wave delivery. Conclusions: The outcome of SWL can be optimized with close attention to patient selection criteria as well as the manner in which the treatment is performed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)99-105
Number of pages7
JournalTherapeutic Advances in Urology
Volume1
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2009

Fingerprint

Lithotripsy
Patient Selection
Therapeutics
Acoustics
Equipment and Supplies

Keywords

  • adverse effects
  • lithotripsy
  • patient selection
  • shock wave
  • technical factors
  • treatment outcome

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

How to improve results with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. / Semins, Michelle J.; Matlaga, Brian.

In: Therapeutic Advances in Urology, Vol. 1, No. 2, 2009, p. 99-105.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{552a80440fe545399df99633f91d8a32,
title = "How to improve results with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy",
abstract = "Objective: Shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) has greatly revolutionized the treatment of patients suffering from stone disease. There are a number of patient- and device-specific factors that can affect treatment outcome. Herein, we review practices that can increase the likelihood of SWL treatment success. Methods: A systematic literature review was performed to identify studies of SWL treatment parameters. Results: Among the factors affecting the outcome of SWL were patient selection criteria, such as stone burden, stone location, and anatomic features. Additionally, technical aspects of the SWL procedure also can affect outcome; these factors include the acoustic output of the lithotripter, the coupling of the lithotripter to the patient, and the power, total number, and rate of shock wave delivery. Conclusions: The outcome of SWL can be optimized with close attention to patient selection criteria as well as the manner in which the treatment is performed.",
keywords = "adverse effects, lithotripsy, patient selection, shock wave, technical factors, treatment outcome",
author = "Semins, {Michelle J.} and Brian Matlaga",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1177/1756287209104832",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "1",
pages = "99--105",
journal = "Therapeutic Advances in Urology",
issn = "1756-2872",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - How to improve results with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy

AU - Semins, Michelle J.

AU - Matlaga, Brian

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - Objective: Shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) has greatly revolutionized the treatment of patients suffering from stone disease. There are a number of patient- and device-specific factors that can affect treatment outcome. Herein, we review practices that can increase the likelihood of SWL treatment success. Methods: A systematic literature review was performed to identify studies of SWL treatment parameters. Results: Among the factors affecting the outcome of SWL were patient selection criteria, such as stone burden, stone location, and anatomic features. Additionally, technical aspects of the SWL procedure also can affect outcome; these factors include the acoustic output of the lithotripter, the coupling of the lithotripter to the patient, and the power, total number, and rate of shock wave delivery. Conclusions: The outcome of SWL can be optimized with close attention to patient selection criteria as well as the manner in which the treatment is performed.

AB - Objective: Shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) has greatly revolutionized the treatment of patients suffering from stone disease. There are a number of patient- and device-specific factors that can affect treatment outcome. Herein, we review practices that can increase the likelihood of SWL treatment success. Methods: A systematic literature review was performed to identify studies of SWL treatment parameters. Results: Among the factors affecting the outcome of SWL were patient selection criteria, such as stone burden, stone location, and anatomic features. Additionally, technical aspects of the SWL procedure also can affect outcome; these factors include the acoustic output of the lithotripter, the coupling of the lithotripter to the patient, and the power, total number, and rate of shock wave delivery. Conclusions: The outcome of SWL can be optimized with close attention to patient selection criteria as well as the manner in which the treatment is performed.

KW - adverse effects

KW - lithotripsy

KW - patient selection

KW - shock wave

KW - technical factors

KW - treatment outcome

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84993811184&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84993811184&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1756287209104832

DO - 10.1177/1756287209104832

M3 - Review article

C2 - 21789058

AN - SCOPUS:84993811184

VL - 1

SP - 99

EP - 105

JO - Therapeutic Advances in Urology

JF - Therapeutic Advances in Urology

SN - 1756-2872

IS - 2

ER -