How safe is my intensive care unit? Methods for monitoring and measurement

Sean Berenholtz, Aliaksei Pustavoitau, Steven J. Schwartz, Peter J. Pronovost

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Patient safety is attracting increasing attention. How we monitor and measure safety, however, is not well defined. In this review we describe a conceptual model for monitoring and measuring safety, describe the development of a safety scorecard, and provide an example of how this scorecard is used in the ICU. RECENT FINDINGS: Our safety scorecard stratifies measures into two categories. One category uses valid rate-based measures to evaluate: How often do we provide the interventions that patients should receive? (process measure); and How often do we harm patients? (outcome measure). The second category includes measures that cannot be expressed as valid rates: How do we know we learned from defects? (structural measure); and How well have we created a culture of safety? (context measure). Measures within each domain should be important and valid, and organizations should be able to use the measures to improve patient safety. SUMMARY: We present a framework for a patient safety scorecard to measure and monitor patient safety. This safety scorecard is a valid and practical tool for ICUs to track progress of efforts to improve patient safety and answer the question, how safe is my ICU?

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)703-708
Number of pages6
JournalCurrent Opinion in Critical Care
Volume13
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2007

Fingerprint

Patient Safety
Intensive Care Units
Safety
Patient Harm
Safety Management
Process Assessment (Health Care)
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Organizations

Keywords

  • Measures
  • Quality of care
  • Safety

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cite this

How safe is my intensive care unit? Methods for monitoring and measurement. / Berenholtz, Sean; Pustavoitau, Aliaksei; Schwartz, Steven J.; Pronovost, Peter J.

In: Current Opinion in Critical Care, Vol. 13, No. 6, 12.2007, p. 703-708.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b2af65a08fb84697863d4cfbb400686a,
title = "How safe is my intensive care unit? Methods for monitoring and measurement",
abstract = "PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Patient safety is attracting increasing attention. How we monitor and measure safety, however, is not well defined. In this review we describe a conceptual model for monitoring and measuring safety, describe the development of a safety scorecard, and provide an example of how this scorecard is used in the ICU. RECENT FINDINGS: Our safety scorecard stratifies measures into two categories. One category uses valid rate-based measures to evaluate: How often do we provide the interventions that patients should receive? (process measure); and How often do we harm patients? (outcome measure). The second category includes measures that cannot be expressed as valid rates: How do we know we learned from defects? (structural measure); and How well have we created a culture of safety? (context measure). Measures within each domain should be important and valid, and organizations should be able to use the measures to improve patient safety. SUMMARY: We present a framework for a patient safety scorecard to measure and monitor patient safety. This safety scorecard is a valid and practical tool for ICUs to track progress of efforts to improve patient safety and answer the question, how safe is my ICU?",
keywords = "Measures, Quality of care, Safety",
author = "Sean Berenholtz and Aliaksei Pustavoitau and Schwartz, {Steven J.} and Pronovost, {Peter J.}",
year = "2007",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1097/MCC.0b013e3282f1bb44",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
pages = "703--708",
journal = "Current Opinion in Critical Care",
issn = "1070-5295",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - How safe is my intensive care unit? Methods for monitoring and measurement

AU - Berenholtz, Sean

AU - Pustavoitau, Aliaksei

AU - Schwartz, Steven J.

AU - Pronovost, Peter J.

PY - 2007/12

Y1 - 2007/12

N2 - PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Patient safety is attracting increasing attention. How we monitor and measure safety, however, is not well defined. In this review we describe a conceptual model for monitoring and measuring safety, describe the development of a safety scorecard, and provide an example of how this scorecard is used in the ICU. RECENT FINDINGS: Our safety scorecard stratifies measures into two categories. One category uses valid rate-based measures to evaluate: How often do we provide the interventions that patients should receive? (process measure); and How often do we harm patients? (outcome measure). The second category includes measures that cannot be expressed as valid rates: How do we know we learned from defects? (structural measure); and How well have we created a culture of safety? (context measure). Measures within each domain should be important and valid, and organizations should be able to use the measures to improve patient safety. SUMMARY: We present a framework for a patient safety scorecard to measure and monitor patient safety. This safety scorecard is a valid and practical tool for ICUs to track progress of efforts to improve patient safety and answer the question, how safe is my ICU?

AB - PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Patient safety is attracting increasing attention. How we monitor and measure safety, however, is not well defined. In this review we describe a conceptual model for monitoring and measuring safety, describe the development of a safety scorecard, and provide an example of how this scorecard is used in the ICU. RECENT FINDINGS: Our safety scorecard stratifies measures into two categories. One category uses valid rate-based measures to evaluate: How often do we provide the interventions that patients should receive? (process measure); and How often do we harm patients? (outcome measure). The second category includes measures that cannot be expressed as valid rates: How do we know we learned from defects? (structural measure); and How well have we created a culture of safety? (context measure). Measures within each domain should be important and valid, and organizations should be able to use the measures to improve patient safety. SUMMARY: We present a framework for a patient safety scorecard to measure and monitor patient safety. This safety scorecard is a valid and practical tool for ICUs to track progress of efforts to improve patient safety and answer the question, how safe is my ICU?

KW - Measures

KW - Quality of care

KW - Safety

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=35848946986&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=35848946986&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/MCC.0b013e3282f1bb44

DO - 10.1097/MCC.0b013e3282f1bb44

M3 - Article

C2 - 17975394

AN - SCOPUS:35848946986

VL - 13

SP - 703

EP - 708

JO - Current Opinion in Critical Care

JF - Current Opinion in Critical Care

SN - 1070-5295

IS - 6

ER -