Housing assistance and child health: A systematic review

Natalie Slopen, Andrew Fenelon, Sandra J Newman, Michel Boudreaux

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

CONTEXT: Given a large and consistent literature revealing a link between housing and health, publicly supported housing assistance programs might play an important role in promoting abstract the health of disadvantaged children. OBJECTIVE: To summarize and evaluate research in which authors examine housing assistance and child health. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Web of Science, PsycInfo, and PAIS (1990–2017). STUDY SELECTION: Eligible studies were required to contain assessments of public housing, multifamily housing, or vouchers in relation to a health outcome in children (ages 0–21); we excluded neighborhood mobility interventions. DATA EXTRACTION: Study design, sample size, age, location, health outcomes, measurement, program comparisons, analytic approach, covariates, and results. RESULTS: We identified 14 studies, including 4 quasi-experimental studies, in which authors examined a range of health outcomes. Across studies, the relationship between housing assistance and child health remains unclear, with ?40% of examined outcomes revealing no association between housing assistance and health. A sizable proportion of observed relationships within the quasi-experimental and association studies were in favor of housing assistance (50.0% and 37.5%, respectively), and negative outcomes were less common and only present among association studies. LIMITATIONS: Potential publication bias, majority of studies were cross-sectional, and substantial variation in outcomes, measurement quality, and methods to address confounding. CONCLUSIONS: The results underscore a need for rigorous studies in which authors evaluate specific housing assistance programs in relation to child outcomes to establish what types of housing assistance, if any, serve as an effective strategy to reduce disparities and advance equity across the lifespan.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere20172742
JournalPediatrics
Volume141
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2018

Fingerprint

Health
Public Housing
Child Health
Publication Bias
Vulnerable Populations
PubMed
Sample Size
Cross-Sectional Studies
Research
Non-Randomized Controlled Trials

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Cite this

Housing assistance and child health : A systematic review. / Slopen, Natalie; Fenelon, Andrew; Newman, Sandra J; Boudreaux, Michel.

In: Pediatrics, Vol. 141, No. 6, e20172742, 01.06.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Slopen, Natalie ; Fenelon, Andrew ; Newman, Sandra J ; Boudreaux, Michel. / Housing assistance and child health : A systematic review. In: Pediatrics. 2018 ; Vol. 141, No. 6.
@article{f22b54083cbf47eeb9126d94acb7d7e6,
title = "Housing assistance and child health: A systematic review",
abstract = "CONTEXT: Given a large and consistent literature revealing a link between housing and health, publicly supported housing assistance programs might play an important role in promoting abstract the health of disadvantaged children. OBJECTIVE: To summarize and evaluate research in which authors examine housing assistance and child health. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Web of Science, PsycInfo, and PAIS (1990–2017). STUDY SELECTION: Eligible studies were required to contain assessments of public housing, multifamily housing, or vouchers in relation to a health outcome in children (ages 0–21); we excluded neighborhood mobility interventions. DATA EXTRACTION: Study design, sample size, age, location, health outcomes, measurement, program comparisons, analytic approach, covariates, and results. RESULTS: We identified 14 studies, including 4 quasi-experimental studies, in which authors examined a range of health outcomes. Across studies, the relationship between housing assistance and child health remains unclear, with ?40{\%} of examined outcomes revealing no association between housing assistance and health. A sizable proportion of observed relationships within the quasi-experimental and association studies were in favor of housing assistance (50.0{\%} and 37.5{\%}, respectively), and negative outcomes were less common and only present among association studies. LIMITATIONS: Potential publication bias, majority of studies were cross-sectional, and substantial variation in outcomes, measurement quality, and methods to address confounding. CONCLUSIONS: The results underscore a need for rigorous studies in which authors evaluate specific housing assistance programs in relation to child outcomes to establish what types of housing assistance, if any, serve as an effective strategy to reduce disparities and advance equity across the lifespan.",
author = "Natalie Slopen and Andrew Fenelon and Newman, {Sandra J} and Michel Boudreaux",
year = "2018",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1542/peds.2017-2742",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "141",
journal = "Pediatrics",
issn = "0031-4005",
publisher = "American Academy of Pediatrics",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Housing assistance and child health

T2 - A systematic review

AU - Slopen, Natalie

AU - Fenelon, Andrew

AU - Newman, Sandra J

AU - Boudreaux, Michel

PY - 2018/6/1

Y1 - 2018/6/1

N2 - CONTEXT: Given a large and consistent literature revealing a link between housing and health, publicly supported housing assistance programs might play an important role in promoting abstract the health of disadvantaged children. OBJECTIVE: To summarize and evaluate research in which authors examine housing assistance and child health. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Web of Science, PsycInfo, and PAIS (1990–2017). STUDY SELECTION: Eligible studies were required to contain assessments of public housing, multifamily housing, or vouchers in relation to a health outcome in children (ages 0–21); we excluded neighborhood mobility interventions. DATA EXTRACTION: Study design, sample size, age, location, health outcomes, measurement, program comparisons, analytic approach, covariates, and results. RESULTS: We identified 14 studies, including 4 quasi-experimental studies, in which authors examined a range of health outcomes. Across studies, the relationship between housing assistance and child health remains unclear, with ?40% of examined outcomes revealing no association between housing assistance and health. A sizable proportion of observed relationships within the quasi-experimental and association studies were in favor of housing assistance (50.0% and 37.5%, respectively), and negative outcomes were less common and only present among association studies. LIMITATIONS: Potential publication bias, majority of studies were cross-sectional, and substantial variation in outcomes, measurement quality, and methods to address confounding. CONCLUSIONS: The results underscore a need for rigorous studies in which authors evaluate specific housing assistance programs in relation to child outcomes to establish what types of housing assistance, if any, serve as an effective strategy to reduce disparities and advance equity across the lifespan.

AB - CONTEXT: Given a large and consistent literature revealing a link between housing and health, publicly supported housing assistance programs might play an important role in promoting abstract the health of disadvantaged children. OBJECTIVE: To summarize and evaluate research in which authors examine housing assistance and child health. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Web of Science, PsycInfo, and PAIS (1990–2017). STUDY SELECTION: Eligible studies were required to contain assessments of public housing, multifamily housing, or vouchers in relation to a health outcome in children (ages 0–21); we excluded neighborhood mobility interventions. DATA EXTRACTION: Study design, sample size, age, location, health outcomes, measurement, program comparisons, analytic approach, covariates, and results. RESULTS: We identified 14 studies, including 4 quasi-experimental studies, in which authors examined a range of health outcomes. Across studies, the relationship between housing assistance and child health remains unclear, with ?40% of examined outcomes revealing no association between housing assistance and health. A sizable proportion of observed relationships within the quasi-experimental and association studies were in favor of housing assistance (50.0% and 37.5%, respectively), and negative outcomes were less common and only present among association studies. LIMITATIONS: Potential publication bias, majority of studies were cross-sectional, and substantial variation in outcomes, measurement quality, and methods to address confounding. CONCLUSIONS: The results underscore a need for rigorous studies in which authors evaluate specific housing assistance programs in relation to child outcomes to establish what types of housing assistance, if any, serve as an effective strategy to reduce disparities and advance equity across the lifespan.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048090868&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85048090868&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1542/peds.2017-2742

DO - 10.1542/peds.2017-2742

M3 - Review article

C2 - 29765008

AN - SCOPUS:85048090868

VL - 141

JO - Pediatrics

JF - Pediatrics

SN - 0031-4005

IS - 6

M1 - e20172742

ER -