House Staff Work Hours and Moonlighting: What Do Residents Want?: A Survey of Pediatric Residents in California

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In the autumn of 1988, pediatric residents were surveyed on attitudes toward work hours, moonlighting, and priorities in regulation of working conditions. Questionnaires for all 756 California residents in accredited pediatric programs were sent to chief residents. Of these, 676 questionnaires were distributed to residents and 319 (47%) were returned. Respondents indicated strong support for limits on house staff working hours, and most approved of the reduction regulations proposed in New York State. Most believed that individual departments, hospitals, or subspecialties should regulate hours. By a ratio of 4.3:1, however, respondents favored legislative intervention if such limits were not set by the profession. Moonlighting was generally considered to be an individual's choice and responsibility, but a majority were willing to restrict moonlighting if total house staff hours were also limited.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1104-1108
Number of pages5
JournalAmerican Journal of Diseases of Children
Volume145
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - 1991
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Internship and Residency
Pediatrics
Hospital Departments
Surveys and Questionnaires

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Cite this

@article{266fd8b46d874b07bc66b4a7f5881794,
title = "House Staff Work Hours and Moonlighting: What Do Residents Want?: A Survey of Pediatric Residents in California",
abstract = "In the autumn of 1988, pediatric residents were surveyed on attitudes toward work hours, moonlighting, and priorities in regulation of working conditions. Questionnaires for all 756 California residents in accredited pediatric programs were sent to chief residents. Of these, 676 questionnaires were distributed to residents and 319 (47{\%}) were returned. Respondents indicated strong support for limits on house staff working hours, and most approved of the reduction regulations proposed in New York State. Most believed that individual departments, hospitals, or subspecialties should regulate hours. By a ratio of 4.3:1, however, respondents favored legislative intervention if such limits were not set by the profession. Moonlighting was generally considered to be an individual's choice and responsibility, but a majority were willing to restrict moonlighting if total house staff hours were also limited.",
author = "Cheng, {Tina L}",
year = "1991",
doi = "10.1001/archpedi.1991.02160100036020",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "145",
pages = "1104--1108",
journal = "JAMA Pediatrics",
issn = "2168-6203",
publisher = "American Medical Association",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - House Staff Work Hours and Moonlighting

T2 - What Do Residents Want?: A Survey of Pediatric Residents in California

AU - Cheng, Tina L

PY - 1991

Y1 - 1991

N2 - In the autumn of 1988, pediatric residents were surveyed on attitudes toward work hours, moonlighting, and priorities in regulation of working conditions. Questionnaires for all 756 California residents in accredited pediatric programs were sent to chief residents. Of these, 676 questionnaires were distributed to residents and 319 (47%) were returned. Respondents indicated strong support for limits on house staff working hours, and most approved of the reduction regulations proposed in New York State. Most believed that individual departments, hospitals, or subspecialties should regulate hours. By a ratio of 4.3:1, however, respondents favored legislative intervention if such limits were not set by the profession. Moonlighting was generally considered to be an individual's choice and responsibility, but a majority were willing to restrict moonlighting if total house staff hours were also limited.

AB - In the autumn of 1988, pediatric residents were surveyed on attitudes toward work hours, moonlighting, and priorities in regulation of working conditions. Questionnaires for all 756 California residents in accredited pediatric programs were sent to chief residents. Of these, 676 questionnaires were distributed to residents and 319 (47%) were returned. Respondents indicated strong support for limits on house staff working hours, and most approved of the reduction regulations proposed in New York State. Most believed that individual departments, hospitals, or subspecialties should regulate hours. By a ratio of 4.3:1, however, respondents favored legislative intervention if such limits were not set by the profession. Moonlighting was generally considered to be an individual's choice and responsibility, but a majority were willing to restrict moonlighting if total house staff hours were also limited.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025948740&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0025948740&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1001/archpedi.1991.02160100036020

DO - 10.1001/archpedi.1991.02160100036020

M3 - Article

C2 - 1928000

AN - SCOPUS:0025948740

VL - 145

SP - 1104

EP - 1108

JO - JAMA Pediatrics

JF - JAMA Pediatrics

SN - 2168-6203

IS - 10

ER -