House Staff Work Hours and Moonlighting: What Do Residents Want?: A Survey of Pediatric Residents in California

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In the autumn of 1988, pediatric residents were surveyed on attitudes toward work hours, moonlighting, and priorities in regulation of working conditions. Questionnaires for all 756 California residents in accredited pediatric programs were sent to chief residents. Of these, 676 questionnaires were distributed to residents and 319 (47%) were returned. Respondents indicated strong support for limits on house staff working hours, and most approved of the reduction regulations proposed in New York State. Most believed that individual departments, hospitals, or subspecialties should regulate hours. By a ratio of 4.3:1, however, respondents favored legislative intervention if such limits were not set by the profession. Moonlighting was generally considered to be an individual's choice and responsibility, but a majority were willing to restrict moonlighting if total house staff hours were also limited.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1104-1108
Number of pages5
JournalAmerican Journal of Diseases of Children
Volume145
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1991
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'House Staff Work Hours and Moonlighting: What Do Residents Want?: A Survey of Pediatric Residents in California'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this