Hounsfield Units for nephrolithiasis: Predictive power for the clinical urologist

Andrew Cohen, Blake Anderson, Glenn Gerber

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Introduction: We aim to determine the optimal method for measuring Hounsfield Units (HU) of calculi for the clinical urologist. Materials and methods: We present a single institution prospective study from 2014-2015 for 125 consecutive patients. Demographics, baseline characteristics, imaging, and stone analysis were collected. CT scanners and settings were heterogeneous. Hounsfield units were measured by use of ellipsoid tool and free hand outline by two independent urology graders using Philips iSite PACs. Results: Stone analysis demonstrated 26 pure calcium oxalate (CaOx) stones, 15 pure calcium phosphate (CaP) stones, and 7 uric acid stones, among other mixed types. Excellent agreement was notable amongst the two graders for ellipsoid and free hand grading, and values were consistent with those previously published with other methods. Mean grades for free-hand versus ellipse differed overall (p = 0.006) as ellipsoid HU measurement was consistently higher than free-hand measurement by an average of 107 units. Either method could differentiate between uric acid stones and any calcium containing stone (p ≤ 0.05). The free-hand method demonstrated statistical difference between pure calcium oxalate and calcium phosphate stones (p = 0.03). Applying either method took less than 6 seconds. Conclusions: For urologists lacking HU on their radiology reports, free hand or ellipsoid measurement may quickly provide an additional tool to guide management. Both methods differentiate between any calcium containing stone and uric acid stones.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)8832-8837
Number of pages6
JournalCanadian Journal of Urology
Volume24
Issue number3
StatePublished - Jun 1 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Nephrolithiasis
Hand
Uric Acid
Calcium Oxalate
Calcium
Calculi
Urology
Urologists
Radiology
Demography
Prospective Studies

Keywords

  • Computerized
  • Hounsfield Units
  • Kidney calculi
  • Nephrolithiasis
  • Stone composition
  • Tomography

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Hounsfield Units for nephrolithiasis : Predictive power for the clinical urologist. / Cohen, Andrew; Anderson, Blake; Gerber, Glenn.

In: Canadian Journal of Urology, Vol. 24, No. 3, 01.06.2017, p. 8832-8837.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Cohen, Andrew ; Anderson, Blake ; Gerber, Glenn. / Hounsfield Units for nephrolithiasis : Predictive power for the clinical urologist. In: Canadian Journal of Urology. 2017 ; Vol. 24, No. 3. pp. 8832-8837.
@article{3b50229540d54d9d84e84f76c7f87057,
title = "Hounsfield Units for nephrolithiasis: Predictive power for the clinical urologist",
abstract = "Introduction: We aim to determine the optimal method for measuring Hounsfield Units (HU) of calculi for the clinical urologist. Materials and methods: We present a single institution prospective study from 2014-2015 for 125 consecutive patients. Demographics, baseline characteristics, imaging, and stone analysis were collected. CT scanners and settings were heterogeneous. Hounsfield units were measured by use of ellipsoid tool and free hand outline by two independent urology graders using Philips iSite PACs. Results: Stone analysis demonstrated 26 pure calcium oxalate (CaOx) stones, 15 pure calcium phosphate (CaP) stones, and 7 uric acid stones, among other mixed types. Excellent agreement was notable amongst the two graders for ellipsoid and free hand grading, and values were consistent with those previously published with other methods. Mean grades for free-hand versus ellipse differed overall (p = 0.006) as ellipsoid HU measurement was consistently higher than free-hand measurement by an average of 107 units. Either method could differentiate between uric acid stones and any calcium containing stone (p ≤ 0.05). The free-hand method demonstrated statistical difference between pure calcium oxalate and calcium phosphate stones (p = 0.03). Applying either method took less than 6 seconds. Conclusions: For urologists lacking HU on their radiology reports, free hand or ellipsoid measurement may quickly provide an additional tool to guide management. Both methods differentiate between any calcium containing stone and uric acid stones.",
keywords = "Computerized, Hounsfield Units, Kidney calculi, Nephrolithiasis, Stone composition, Tomography",
author = "Andrew Cohen and Blake Anderson and Glenn Gerber",
year = "2017",
month = "6",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "8832--8837",
journal = "Canadian Journal of Urology",
issn = "1195-9479",
publisher = "Canadian Journal of Urology",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Hounsfield Units for nephrolithiasis

T2 - Predictive power for the clinical urologist

AU - Cohen, Andrew

AU - Anderson, Blake

AU - Gerber, Glenn

PY - 2017/6/1

Y1 - 2017/6/1

N2 - Introduction: We aim to determine the optimal method for measuring Hounsfield Units (HU) of calculi for the clinical urologist. Materials and methods: We present a single institution prospective study from 2014-2015 for 125 consecutive patients. Demographics, baseline characteristics, imaging, and stone analysis were collected. CT scanners and settings were heterogeneous. Hounsfield units were measured by use of ellipsoid tool and free hand outline by two independent urology graders using Philips iSite PACs. Results: Stone analysis demonstrated 26 pure calcium oxalate (CaOx) stones, 15 pure calcium phosphate (CaP) stones, and 7 uric acid stones, among other mixed types. Excellent agreement was notable amongst the two graders for ellipsoid and free hand grading, and values were consistent with those previously published with other methods. Mean grades for free-hand versus ellipse differed overall (p = 0.006) as ellipsoid HU measurement was consistently higher than free-hand measurement by an average of 107 units. Either method could differentiate between uric acid stones and any calcium containing stone (p ≤ 0.05). The free-hand method demonstrated statistical difference between pure calcium oxalate and calcium phosphate stones (p = 0.03). Applying either method took less than 6 seconds. Conclusions: For urologists lacking HU on their radiology reports, free hand or ellipsoid measurement may quickly provide an additional tool to guide management. Both methods differentiate between any calcium containing stone and uric acid stones.

AB - Introduction: We aim to determine the optimal method for measuring Hounsfield Units (HU) of calculi for the clinical urologist. Materials and methods: We present a single institution prospective study from 2014-2015 for 125 consecutive patients. Demographics, baseline characteristics, imaging, and stone analysis were collected. CT scanners and settings were heterogeneous. Hounsfield units were measured by use of ellipsoid tool and free hand outline by two independent urology graders using Philips iSite PACs. Results: Stone analysis demonstrated 26 pure calcium oxalate (CaOx) stones, 15 pure calcium phosphate (CaP) stones, and 7 uric acid stones, among other mixed types. Excellent agreement was notable amongst the two graders for ellipsoid and free hand grading, and values were consistent with those previously published with other methods. Mean grades for free-hand versus ellipse differed overall (p = 0.006) as ellipsoid HU measurement was consistently higher than free-hand measurement by an average of 107 units. Either method could differentiate between uric acid stones and any calcium containing stone (p ≤ 0.05). The free-hand method demonstrated statistical difference between pure calcium oxalate and calcium phosphate stones (p = 0.03). Applying either method took less than 6 seconds. Conclusions: For urologists lacking HU on their radiology reports, free hand or ellipsoid measurement may quickly provide an additional tool to guide management. Both methods differentiate between any calcium containing stone and uric acid stones.

KW - Computerized

KW - Hounsfield Units

KW - Kidney calculi

KW - Nephrolithiasis

KW - Stone composition

KW - Tomography

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85021222578&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85021222578&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 28646939

AN - SCOPUS:85021222578

VL - 24

SP - 8832

EP - 8837

JO - Canadian Journal of Urology

JF - Canadian Journal of Urology

SN - 1195-9479

IS - 3

ER -