Hospitalists' ability to use hand-carried ultrasound for central venous pressure estimation after a brief training intervention: A pilot study

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Access to hand-carried ultrasound technology for noncardiologists has increased significantly, yet development and evaluation of training programs are limited. OBJECTIVE: We studied a focused program to teach hospitalists image acquisition of inferior vena cava (IVC) diameter and IVC collapsibility index with interpretation of estimated central venous pressure (CVP). METHODS: Ten hospitalists completed an online educational module prior to attending a 1-day in-person training session that included directly supervised IVC imaging on volunteer subjects. In addition to making quantitative assessments, hospitalists were also asked to visually assess whether the IVC collapsed more than 50% during rapid inspiration or a sniff maneuver. Skills in image acquisition and interpretation were assessed immediately after training on volunteer patients and prerecorded images, and again on volunteer patients at least 6 weeks later. RESULTS: Eight of 10 hospitalists acquired adequate IVC images and interpreted them correctly on 5 of the 5 volunteer subjects and interpreted all 10 prerecorded images correctly at the end of the 1-day training session. At 7.4±0.7 weeks (range, 6.9-8.6 weeks) follow-up, 9 of 10 hospitalists accurately acquired and interpreted all IVC images in 5 of 5 volunteers. Hospitalists were also able to accurately determine whether the IVC collapsibility index was more than 50% by visual assessment in 180 of 198 attempts (91% of the time). CONCLUSIONS: After a brief training program, hospitalists acquired adequate skills to perform and interpret hand-carried ultrasound IVC images and retained these skills in the near term. Though calculation of the IVC collapsibility index is more accurate, coupling a qualitative assessment with the IVC maximum diameter measurement may be acceptable in aiding bedside estimation of CVP. Journal of Hospital Medicine 2013;8:711-714.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)711-714
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Hospital Medicine
Volume8
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2013

Fingerprint

Hospitalists
Central Venous Pressure
Inferior Vena Cava
Hand
Volunteers
Hospital Medicine
Education

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy
  • Assessment and Diagnosis
  • Care Planning
  • Fundamentals and skills
  • Leadership and Management

Cite this

@article{63fd26a8db1d4ab19d9d15ae5da0ed1d,
title = "Hospitalists' ability to use hand-carried ultrasound for central venous pressure estimation after a brief training intervention: A pilot study",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Access to hand-carried ultrasound technology for noncardiologists has increased significantly, yet development and evaluation of training programs are limited. OBJECTIVE: We studied a focused program to teach hospitalists image acquisition of inferior vena cava (IVC) diameter and IVC collapsibility index with interpretation of estimated central venous pressure (CVP). METHODS: Ten hospitalists completed an online educational module prior to attending a 1-day in-person training session that included directly supervised IVC imaging on volunteer subjects. In addition to making quantitative assessments, hospitalists were also asked to visually assess whether the IVC collapsed more than 50{\%} during rapid inspiration or a sniff maneuver. Skills in image acquisition and interpretation were assessed immediately after training on volunteer patients and prerecorded images, and again on volunteer patients at least 6 weeks later. RESULTS: Eight of 10 hospitalists acquired adequate IVC images and interpreted them correctly on 5 of the 5 volunteer subjects and interpreted all 10 prerecorded images correctly at the end of the 1-day training session. At 7.4±0.7 weeks (range, 6.9-8.6 weeks) follow-up, 9 of 10 hospitalists accurately acquired and interpreted all IVC images in 5 of 5 volunteers. Hospitalists were also able to accurately determine whether the IVC collapsibility index was more than 50{\%} by visual assessment in 180 of 198 attempts (91{\%} of the time). CONCLUSIONS: After a brief training program, hospitalists acquired adequate skills to perform and interpret hand-carried ultrasound IVC images and retained these skills in the near term. Though calculation of the IVC collapsibility index is more accurate, coupling a qualitative assessment with the IVC maximum diameter measurement may be acceptable in aiding bedside estimation of CVP. Journal of Hospital Medicine 2013;8:711-714.",
author = "Martin, {Lorrin David} and Roy Ziegelstein and Howell, {Eric E} and Carol Martire and Hellmann, {David B} and Hirsch, {Glenn A.}",
year = "2013",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1002/jhm.2103",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
pages = "711--714",
journal = "Journal of hospital medicine (Online)",
issn = "1553-5606",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Hospitalists' ability to use hand-carried ultrasound for central venous pressure estimation after a brief training intervention

T2 - A pilot study

AU - Martin, Lorrin David

AU - Ziegelstein, Roy

AU - Howell, Eric E

AU - Martire, Carol

AU - Hellmann, David B

AU - Hirsch, Glenn A.

PY - 2013/12

Y1 - 2013/12

N2 - BACKGROUND: Access to hand-carried ultrasound technology for noncardiologists has increased significantly, yet development and evaluation of training programs are limited. OBJECTIVE: We studied a focused program to teach hospitalists image acquisition of inferior vena cava (IVC) diameter and IVC collapsibility index with interpretation of estimated central venous pressure (CVP). METHODS: Ten hospitalists completed an online educational module prior to attending a 1-day in-person training session that included directly supervised IVC imaging on volunteer subjects. In addition to making quantitative assessments, hospitalists were also asked to visually assess whether the IVC collapsed more than 50% during rapid inspiration or a sniff maneuver. Skills in image acquisition and interpretation were assessed immediately after training on volunteer patients and prerecorded images, and again on volunteer patients at least 6 weeks later. RESULTS: Eight of 10 hospitalists acquired adequate IVC images and interpreted them correctly on 5 of the 5 volunteer subjects and interpreted all 10 prerecorded images correctly at the end of the 1-day training session. At 7.4±0.7 weeks (range, 6.9-8.6 weeks) follow-up, 9 of 10 hospitalists accurately acquired and interpreted all IVC images in 5 of 5 volunteers. Hospitalists were also able to accurately determine whether the IVC collapsibility index was more than 50% by visual assessment in 180 of 198 attempts (91% of the time). CONCLUSIONS: After a brief training program, hospitalists acquired adequate skills to perform and interpret hand-carried ultrasound IVC images and retained these skills in the near term. Though calculation of the IVC collapsibility index is more accurate, coupling a qualitative assessment with the IVC maximum diameter measurement may be acceptable in aiding bedside estimation of CVP. Journal of Hospital Medicine 2013;8:711-714.

AB - BACKGROUND: Access to hand-carried ultrasound technology for noncardiologists has increased significantly, yet development and evaluation of training programs are limited. OBJECTIVE: We studied a focused program to teach hospitalists image acquisition of inferior vena cava (IVC) diameter and IVC collapsibility index with interpretation of estimated central venous pressure (CVP). METHODS: Ten hospitalists completed an online educational module prior to attending a 1-day in-person training session that included directly supervised IVC imaging on volunteer subjects. In addition to making quantitative assessments, hospitalists were also asked to visually assess whether the IVC collapsed more than 50% during rapid inspiration or a sniff maneuver. Skills in image acquisition and interpretation were assessed immediately after training on volunteer patients and prerecorded images, and again on volunteer patients at least 6 weeks later. RESULTS: Eight of 10 hospitalists acquired adequate IVC images and interpreted them correctly on 5 of the 5 volunteer subjects and interpreted all 10 prerecorded images correctly at the end of the 1-day training session. At 7.4±0.7 weeks (range, 6.9-8.6 weeks) follow-up, 9 of 10 hospitalists accurately acquired and interpreted all IVC images in 5 of 5 volunteers. Hospitalists were also able to accurately determine whether the IVC collapsibility index was more than 50% by visual assessment in 180 of 198 attempts (91% of the time). CONCLUSIONS: After a brief training program, hospitalists acquired adequate skills to perform and interpret hand-carried ultrasound IVC images and retained these skills in the near term. Though calculation of the IVC collapsibility index is more accurate, coupling a qualitative assessment with the IVC maximum diameter measurement may be acceptable in aiding bedside estimation of CVP. Journal of Hospital Medicine 2013;8:711-714.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84889665308&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84889665308&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/jhm.2103

DO - 10.1002/jhm.2103

M3 - Article

C2 - 24243560

AN - SCOPUS:84889665308

VL - 8

SP - 711

EP - 714

JO - Journal of hospital medicine (Online)

JF - Journal of hospital medicine (Online)

SN - 1553-5606

IS - 12

ER -