Hospital variation in sphincter preservation for elderly rectal cancer patients

Christopher M. Dodgion, Bridget A. Neville, Stuart R. Lipsitz, Deborah Schrag, Elizabeth Breen, Michael J. Zinner, Caprice C. Greenberg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background The primary goal of an operation for rectal cancer is to cure cancer and, where possible, preserve continence. A wide range of sphincter preservation rates have been reported. This study evaluated hospital variation in the use of low anterior resection (LAR), local excision (LE), and abdominoperineal resection (APR) in the treatment of elderly rectal cancer patients. Methods Using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare linked data, we identified 4959 patients older than 65 y with stage I-III rectal cancer diagnosed from 2000-2005 who underwent operative intervention at one of 370 hospitals. We evaluated the distribution of hospital-specific procedure rates and used generalized mixed models with random hospital effects to examine the influence of patient characteristics and hospital on operation type, using APR as a reference. Results The median hospital performed APR on 33% of elderly patients with rectal cancer. Hospital was a stronger predictor of LAR receipt than any patient characteristic, explaining 32% of procedure choice, but not a strong predictor of LE, explaining only 3.8%. Receipt of LE was primarily related to tumor size and tumor stage, which combined explained 31% of procedure variation. Conclusions Receipt of LE is primarily determined by patient characteristics. In contrast, the hospital where surgery is performed significantly influences whether a patient undergoes an LAR or APR. Understanding the factors that cause this institutional variation is crucial to ensuring equitable availability of sphincter preservation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)161-168
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Surgical Research
Volume191
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Rectal Neoplasms
Neoplasms
Medicare
Epidemiology

Keywords

  • Elderly
  • Hospital variation
  • Rectal cancer
  • Sphincter sparing surgery

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Dodgion, C. M., Neville, B. A., Lipsitz, S. R., Schrag, D., Breen, E., Zinner, M. J., & Greenberg, C. C. (2014). Hospital variation in sphincter preservation for elderly rectal cancer patients. Journal of Surgical Research, 191(1), 161-168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2014.03.047

Hospital variation in sphincter preservation for elderly rectal cancer patients. / Dodgion, Christopher M.; Neville, Bridget A.; Lipsitz, Stuart R.; Schrag, Deborah; Breen, Elizabeth; Zinner, Michael J.; Greenberg, Caprice C.

In: Journal of Surgical Research, Vol. 191, No. 1, 2014, p. 161-168.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Dodgion, CM, Neville, BA, Lipsitz, SR, Schrag, D, Breen, E, Zinner, MJ & Greenberg, CC 2014, 'Hospital variation in sphincter preservation for elderly rectal cancer patients', Journal of Surgical Research, vol. 191, no. 1, pp. 161-168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2014.03.047
Dodgion, Christopher M. ; Neville, Bridget A. ; Lipsitz, Stuart R. ; Schrag, Deborah ; Breen, Elizabeth ; Zinner, Michael J. ; Greenberg, Caprice C. / Hospital variation in sphincter preservation for elderly rectal cancer patients. In: Journal of Surgical Research. 2014 ; Vol. 191, No. 1. pp. 161-168.
@article{e12c05bf6ef74c71b9808a1f374e1181,
title = "Hospital variation in sphincter preservation for elderly rectal cancer patients",
abstract = "Background The primary goal of an operation for rectal cancer is to cure cancer and, where possible, preserve continence. A wide range of sphincter preservation rates have been reported. This study evaluated hospital variation in the use of low anterior resection (LAR), local excision (LE), and abdominoperineal resection (APR) in the treatment of elderly rectal cancer patients. Methods Using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare linked data, we identified 4959 patients older than 65 y with stage I-III rectal cancer diagnosed from 2000-2005 who underwent operative intervention at one of 370 hospitals. We evaluated the distribution of hospital-specific procedure rates and used generalized mixed models with random hospital effects to examine the influence of patient characteristics and hospital on operation type, using APR as a reference. Results The median hospital performed APR on 33{\%} of elderly patients with rectal cancer. Hospital was a stronger predictor of LAR receipt than any patient characteristic, explaining 32{\%} of procedure choice, but not a strong predictor of LE, explaining only 3.8{\%}. Receipt of LE was primarily related to tumor size and tumor stage, which combined explained 31{\%} of procedure variation. Conclusions Receipt of LE is primarily determined by patient characteristics. In contrast, the hospital where surgery is performed significantly influences whether a patient undergoes an LAR or APR. Understanding the factors that cause this institutional variation is crucial to ensuring equitable availability of sphincter preservation.",
keywords = "Elderly, Hospital variation, Rectal cancer, Sphincter sparing surgery",
author = "Dodgion, {Christopher M.} and Neville, {Bridget A.} and Lipsitz, {Stuart R.} and Deborah Schrag and Elizabeth Breen and Zinner, {Michael J.} and Greenberg, {Caprice C.}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1016/j.jss.2014.03.047",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "191",
pages = "161--168",
journal = "Journal of Surgical Research",
issn = "0022-4804",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Hospital variation in sphincter preservation for elderly rectal cancer patients

AU - Dodgion, Christopher M.

AU - Neville, Bridget A.

AU - Lipsitz, Stuart R.

AU - Schrag, Deborah

AU - Breen, Elizabeth

AU - Zinner, Michael J.

AU - Greenberg, Caprice C.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Background The primary goal of an operation for rectal cancer is to cure cancer and, where possible, preserve continence. A wide range of sphincter preservation rates have been reported. This study evaluated hospital variation in the use of low anterior resection (LAR), local excision (LE), and abdominoperineal resection (APR) in the treatment of elderly rectal cancer patients. Methods Using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare linked data, we identified 4959 patients older than 65 y with stage I-III rectal cancer diagnosed from 2000-2005 who underwent operative intervention at one of 370 hospitals. We evaluated the distribution of hospital-specific procedure rates and used generalized mixed models with random hospital effects to examine the influence of patient characteristics and hospital on operation type, using APR as a reference. Results The median hospital performed APR on 33% of elderly patients with rectal cancer. Hospital was a stronger predictor of LAR receipt than any patient characteristic, explaining 32% of procedure choice, but not a strong predictor of LE, explaining only 3.8%. Receipt of LE was primarily related to tumor size and tumor stage, which combined explained 31% of procedure variation. Conclusions Receipt of LE is primarily determined by patient characteristics. In contrast, the hospital where surgery is performed significantly influences whether a patient undergoes an LAR or APR. Understanding the factors that cause this institutional variation is crucial to ensuring equitable availability of sphincter preservation.

AB - Background The primary goal of an operation for rectal cancer is to cure cancer and, where possible, preserve continence. A wide range of sphincter preservation rates have been reported. This study evaluated hospital variation in the use of low anterior resection (LAR), local excision (LE), and abdominoperineal resection (APR) in the treatment of elderly rectal cancer patients. Methods Using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare linked data, we identified 4959 patients older than 65 y with stage I-III rectal cancer diagnosed from 2000-2005 who underwent operative intervention at one of 370 hospitals. We evaluated the distribution of hospital-specific procedure rates and used generalized mixed models with random hospital effects to examine the influence of patient characteristics and hospital on operation type, using APR as a reference. Results The median hospital performed APR on 33% of elderly patients with rectal cancer. Hospital was a stronger predictor of LAR receipt than any patient characteristic, explaining 32% of procedure choice, but not a strong predictor of LE, explaining only 3.8%. Receipt of LE was primarily related to tumor size and tumor stage, which combined explained 31% of procedure variation. Conclusions Receipt of LE is primarily determined by patient characteristics. In contrast, the hospital where surgery is performed significantly influences whether a patient undergoes an LAR or APR. Understanding the factors that cause this institutional variation is crucial to ensuring equitable availability of sphincter preservation.

KW - Elderly

KW - Hospital variation

KW - Rectal cancer

KW - Sphincter sparing surgery

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84906227108&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84906227108&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jss.2014.03.047

DO - 10.1016/j.jss.2014.03.047

M3 - Article

C2 - 24750983

AN - SCOPUS:84906227108

VL - 191

SP - 161

EP - 168

JO - Journal of Surgical Research

JF - Journal of Surgical Research

SN - 0022-4804

IS - 1

ER -