Hospital use of agency-employed supplemental nurses and patient mortality and failure to rescue

Linda H. Aiken, Jingjing Shang, Ying Xue, Douglas M. Sloane

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Objective To determine the association between the use of agency-employed supplemental registered nurses (SRNs) to staff hospitals and patient mortality and failure to rescue (FTR). Data Sources Primary survey data from 40,356 registered nurses in 665 hospitals in four states in 2006 were linked with American Hospital Association and inpatient mortality data from state agencies for approximately 1.3 million patients. Study Design Logistic regression models were used to examine the association between SRN use and 30-day in-hospital mortality and FTR, controlling for patient and hospital characteristics, nurse staffing, the proportion of nurses with bachelor's degrees, and quality of the work environment. Principal Findings Before controlling for multiple nurse characteristics of hospitals, higher proportions of agency-employed SRNs in hospitals appeared to be associated with higher mortality (OR = 1.06) and FTR (OR = 1.05). Hospitals with higher proportions of SRNs have poorer work environments, however, and the significant relationships between SRNs and mortality outcomes were rendered insignificant when work environments were taken into account. Conclusions Higher use of SRNs does not appear to have deleterious consequences for patient mortality and may alleviate nurse staffing problems that could produce higher mortality.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)931-948
Number of pages18
JournalHealth Services Research
Volume48
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2013
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • failure to rescue
  • hospital mortality
  • Supplemental nurses

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Hospital use of agency-employed supplemental nurses and patient mortality and failure to rescue'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this