Hospital manipulations in the DRG system: A systematic scoping review

Krit Pongpirul, William C Robinson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: In the Diagnosis Related Group (DRG) payment system, hospitals are usually suspected of 'DRG creep,' which has been narrowly regarded as reporting diagnostic and procedural codes that result in larger reimbursement. Objective: This review was aimed to systematically explore ways in which hospital manipulations of DRG coding may occur. Methods: A systematic scoping review was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, EconLIT, Proquest Digital Dissertation and Theses, Conference Proceedings, and Thai Index Medicus, using appropriate search strategies. Based on predefined criteria, each article abstract was screened by two screeners with good inter-rater reliability. The included articles were qualitatively explored using thematic content analysis. Results: Hospital manipulations of the DRG system can be categorized into three groups: corporate, clinical, and coding practices. Corporate includes all activities not directly related to patient care; possible manipulations are focused on hospital management, administration, or finance and therefore are the responsibility of the executive board or hospital director. Clinical manipulation deals with activities in the care process and is the responsibility of health care professionals. The last group covers conventional definition of DRG creep that focuses on documentation and coding. Conclusion: Hospital managers who deal with the DRG payment system should be aware that DRG creep is not merely about upcoding. Indeed, the DRG system can be manipulated by hospitals in three different approaches, the so-called "3C": corporate, clinical, and coding practices.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)301-310
Number of pages10
JournalAsian Biomedicine
Volume7
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2013

Fingerprint

Diagnosis-Related Groups
Creep
MEDLINE
Clinical Coding
Hospital Administration
Finance
Health care
Documentation
Patient Care
Managers
Delivery of Health Care

Keywords

  • Diagnosis related group
  • DRG creep
  • Hospital coding practice
  • Provider payment
  • Upcoding

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)

Cite this

Hospital manipulations in the DRG system : A systematic scoping review. / Pongpirul, Krit; Robinson, William C.

In: Asian Biomedicine, Vol. 7, No. 3, 06.2013, p. 301-310.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ea7b2ead75c14610ab9c30e0a6c7e04d,
title = "Hospital manipulations in the DRG system: A systematic scoping review",
abstract = "Background: In the Diagnosis Related Group (DRG) payment system, hospitals are usually suspected of 'DRG creep,' which has been narrowly regarded as reporting diagnostic and procedural codes that result in larger reimbursement. Objective: This review was aimed to systematically explore ways in which hospital manipulations of DRG coding may occur. Methods: A systematic scoping review was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, EconLIT, Proquest Digital Dissertation and Theses, Conference Proceedings, and Thai Index Medicus, using appropriate search strategies. Based on predefined criteria, each article abstract was screened by two screeners with good inter-rater reliability. The included articles were qualitatively explored using thematic content analysis. Results: Hospital manipulations of the DRG system can be categorized into three groups: corporate, clinical, and coding practices. Corporate includes all activities not directly related to patient care; possible manipulations are focused on hospital management, administration, or finance and therefore are the responsibility of the executive board or hospital director. Clinical manipulation deals with activities in the care process and is the responsibility of health care professionals. The last group covers conventional definition of DRG creep that focuses on documentation and coding. Conclusion: Hospital managers who deal with the DRG payment system should be aware that DRG creep is not merely about upcoding. Indeed, the DRG system can be manipulated by hospitals in three different approaches, the so-called {"}3C{"}: corporate, clinical, and coding practices.",
keywords = "Diagnosis related group, DRG creep, Hospital coding practice, Provider payment, Upcoding",
author = "Krit Pongpirul and Robinson, {William C}",
year = "2013",
month = "6",
doi = "10.5372/1905-7415.0703.180",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
pages = "301--310",
journal = "Asian Biomedicine",
issn = "1905-7415",
publisher = "IOS Press",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Hospital manipulations in the DRG system

T2 - A systematic scoping review

AU - Pongpirul, Krit

AU - Robinson, William C

PY - 2013/6

Y1 - 2013/6

N2 - Background: In the Diagnosis Related Group (DRG) payment system, hospitals are usually suspected of 'DRG creep,' which has been narrowly regarded as reporting diagnostic and procedural codes that result in larger reimbursement. Objective: This review was aimed to systematically explore ways in which hospital manipulations of DRG coding may occur. Methods: A systematic scoping review was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, EconLIT, Proquest Digital Dissertation and Theses, Conference Proceedings, and Thai Index Medicus, using appropriate search strategies. Based on predefined criteria, each article abstract was screened by two screeners with good inter-rater reliability. The included articles were qualitatively explored using thematic content analysis. Results: Hospital manipulations of the DRG system can be categorized into three groups: corporate, clinical, and coding practices. Corporate includes all activities not directly related to patient care; possible manipulations are focused on hospital management, administration, or finance and therefore are the responsibility of the executive board or hospital director. Clinical manipulation deals with activities in the care process and is the responsibility of health care professionals. The last group covers conventional definition of DRG creep that focuses on documentation and coding. Conclusion: Hospital managers who deal with the DRG payment system should be aware that DRG creep is not merely about upcoding. Indeed, the DRG system can be manipulated by hospitals in three different approaches, the so-called "3C": corporate, clinical, and coding practices.

AB - Background: In the Diagnosis Related Group (DRG) payment system, hospitals are usually suspected of 'DRG creep,' which has been narrowly regarded as reporting diagnostic and procedural codes that result in larger reimbursement. Objective: This review was aimed to systematically explore ways in which hospital manipulations of DRG coding may occur. Methods: A systematic scoping review was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, EconLIT, Proquest Digital Dissertation and Theses, Conference Proceedings, and Thai Index Medicus, using appropriate search strategies. Based on predefined criteria, each article abstract was screened by two screeners with good inter-rater reliability. The included articles were qualitatively explored using thematic content analysis. Results: Hospital manipulations of the DRG system can be categorized into three groups: corporate, clinical, and coding practices. Corporate includes all activities not directly related to patient care; possible manipulations are focused on hospital management, administration, or finance and therefore are the responsibility of the executive board or hospital director. Clinical manipulation deals with activities in the care process and is the responsibility of health care professionals. The last group covers conventional definition of DRG creep that focuses on documentation and coding. Conclusion: Hospital managers who deal with the DRG payment system should be aware that DRG creep is not merely about upcoding. Indeed, the DRG system can be manipulated by hospitals in three different approaches, the so-called "3C": corporate, clinical, and coding practices.

KW - Diagnosis related group

KW - DRG creep

KW - Hospital coding practice

KW - Provider payment

KW - Upcoding

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84880662968&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84880662968&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5372/1905-7415.0703.180

DO - 10.5372/1905-7415.0703.180

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84880662968

VL - 7

SP - 301

EP - 310

JO - Asian Biomedicine

JF - Asian Biomedicine

SN - 1905-7415

IS - 3

ER -