Hospital certificate-of-need controls: Impact on investment, costs, and use

David S Salkever, T. W. Bice

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

This monograph presents findings from an empirical study of the impact of certificate-of-need (CON) legislation on growth in hospital investment, utilization and costs over the 1968-1972 period. Two different methods were used for estimating CON impacts. The first method uses data from the 48 contiguous states and the District of Columbia to estimate investment regressions. Findings for states with CON are compared to those without CON programs. For the second method, data from states without CON programs were used to estimate investment regressions. The estimated regression coefficients were then used to predict the level of investment over the 1968-1972 period for five states with the earliest CON programs; the differences between predicted investment and actual investment in each of the five states measures the impact of CON controls. Analysis indicated that CON controls did not significantly affect total investment by hospitals, but did alter the composition of investments. Results showed that CON programs resulted in a lower rate of growth of bed supplies, but a higher growth of plant assets per bed than would have been observed in the absence of controls. The study also found that the rise in hospital costs per capita was not substantially reduced by CON controls; savings from lower admission rates and total hospital days were offset by higher than average per diem costs stemming from upgrading styles of care. The results suggest the possibility that CON controls may actually have exacerbated cost inflation during the study period. As the findings are based on data from 1968-1972, policymakers are cautioned to be careful when extra-polating the results of this study to the present. Until later information indicates that CON controls will not distort investment patterns, it is suggested that there is a need to rely more heavily on alternative or additional means of controlling health care costs, e.g., prospective rate-setting, HMOs, disease prevention and health manpower policies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationAbstracts of Health Care Management Studies
Volume16
Edition1
StatePublished - 1979
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Certificate of Need
Costs and Cost Analysis
Growth
Health Manpower
Health Maintenance Organizations
Hospital Costs
Economic Inflation
Health Policy
Legislation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Salkever, D. S., & Bice, T. W. (1979). Hospital certificate-of-need controls: Impact on investment, costs, and use. In Abstracts of Health Care Management Studies (1 ed., Vol. 16)

Hospital certificate-of-need controls : Impact on investment, costs, and use. / Salkever, David S; Bice, T. W.

Abstracts of Health Care Management Studies. Vol. 16 1. ed. 1979.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Salkever, DS & Bice, TW 1979, Hospital certificate-of-need controls: Impact on investment, costs, and use. in Abstracts of Health Care Management Studies. 1 edn, vol. 16.
Salkever DS, Bice TW. Hospital certificate-of-need controls: Impact on investment, costs, and use. In Abstracts of Health Care Management Studies. 1 ed. Vol. 16. 1979
Salkever, David S ; Bice, T. W. / Hospital certificate-of-need controls : Impact on investment, costs, and use. Abstracts of Health Care Management Studies. Vol. 16 1. ed. 1979.
@inbook{55cd0f0708ef4a1890eeb7078c4e4f9e,
title = "Hospital certificate-of-need controls: Impact on investment, costs, and use",
abstract = "This monograph presents findings from an empirical study of the impact of certificate-of-need (CON) legislation on growth in hospital investment, utilization and costs over the 1968-1972 period. Two different methods were used for estimating CON impacts. The first method uses data from the 48 contiguous states and the District of Columbia to estimate investment regressions. Findings for states with CON are compared to those without CON programs. For the second method, data from states without CON programs were used to estimate investment regressions. The estimated regression coefficients were then used to predict the level of investment over the 1968-1972 period for five states with the earliest CON programs; the differences between predicted investment and actual investment in each of the five states measures the impact of CON controls. Analysis indicated that CON controls did not significantly affect total investment by hospitals, but did alter the composition of investments. Results showed that CON programs resulted in a lower rate of growth of bed supplies, but a higher growth of plant assets per bed than would have been observed in the absence of controls. The study also found that the rise in hospital costs per capita was not substantially reduced by CON controls; savings from lower admission rates and total hospital days were offset by higher than average per diem costs stemming from upgrading styles of care. The results suggest the possibility that CON controls may actually have exacerbated cost inflation during the study period. As the findings are based on data from 1968-1972, policymakers are cautioned to be careful when extra-polating the results of this study to the present. Until later information indicates that CON controls will not distort investment patterns, it is suggested that there is a need to rely more heavily on alternative or additional means of controlling health care costs, e.g., prospective rate-setting, HMOs, disease prevention and health manpower policies.",
author = "Salkever, {David S} and Bice, {T. W.}",
year = "1979",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
booktitle = "Abstracts of Health Care Management Studies",
edition = "1",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Hospital certificate-of-need controls

T2 - Impact on investment, costs, and use

AU - Salkever, David S

AU - Bice, T. W.

PY - 1979

Y1 - 1979

N2 - This monograph presents findings from an empirical study of the impact of certificate-of-need (CON) legislation on growth in hospital investment, utilization and costs over the 1968-1972 period. Two different methods were used for estimating CON impacts. The first method uses data from the 48 contiguous states and the District of Columbia to estimate investment regressions. Findings for states with CON are compared to those without CON programs. For the second method, data from states without CON programs were used to estimate investment regressions. The estimated regression coefficients were then used to predict the level of investment over the 1968-1972 period for five states with the earliest CON programs; the differences between predicted investment and actual investment in each of the five states measures the impact of CON controls. Analysis indicated that CON controls did not significantly affect total investment by hospitals, but did alter the composition of investments. Results showed that CON programs resulted in a lower rate of growth of bed supplies, but a higher growth of plant assets per bed than would have been observed in the absence of controls. The study also found that the rise in hospital costs per capita was not substantially reduced by CON controls; savings from lower admission rates and total hospital days were offset by higher than average per diem costs stemming from upgrading styles of care. The results suggest the possibility that CON controls may actually have exacerbated cost inflation during the study period. As the findings are based on data from 1968-1972, policymakers are cautioned to be careful when extra-polating the results of this study to the present. Until later information indicates that CON controls will not distort investment patterns, it is suggested that there is a need to rely more heavily on alternative or additional means of controlling health care costs, e.g., prospective rate-setting, HMOs, disease prevention and health manpower policies.

AB - This monograph presents findings from an empirical study of the impact of certificate-of-need (CON) legislation on growth in hospital investment, utilization and costs over the 1968-1972 period. Two different methods were used for estimating CON impacts. The first method uses data from the 48 contiguous states and the District of Columbia to estimate investment regressions. Findings for states with CON are compared to those without CON programs. For the second method, data from states without CON programs were used to estimate investment regressions. The estimated regression coefficients were then used to predict the level of investment over the 1968-1972 period for five states with the earliest CON programs; the differences between predicted investment and actual investment in each of the five states measures the impact of CON controls. Analysis indicated that CON controls did not significantly affect total investment by hospitals, but did alter the composition of investments. Results showed that CON programs resulted in a lower rate of growth of bed supplies, but a higher growth of plant assets per bed than would have been observed in the absence of controls. The study also found that the rise in hospital costs per capita was not substantially reduced by CON controls; savings from lower admission rates and total hospital days were offset by higher than average per diem costs stemming from upgrading styles of care. The results suggest the possibility that CON controls may actually have exacerbated cost inflation during the study period. As the findings are based on data from 1968-1972, policymakers are cautioned to be careful when extra-polating the results of this study to the present. Until later information indicates that CON controls will not distort investment patterns, it is suggested that there is a need to rely more heavily on alternative or additional means of controlling health care costs, e.g., prospective rate-setting, HMOs, disease prevention and health manpower policies.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0018633017&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0018633017&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:0018633017

VL - 16

BT - Abstracts of Health Care Management Studies

ER -