Hormonal contraception and area of cervical ectopy

A longitudinal assessment

Patricia L. Bright, Abigail Norris Turner, Charles S. Morrison, Emelita L. Wong, Cynthia Kwok, Irina Yacobson, Rachel A. Royce, Heidi O. Tucker, Paul D. Blumenthal

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: The effect of combined oral contraceptives (COCs) and depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) on the area of cervical ectopy is not well understood. Study Design: From 1996 to 1999, we recruited women not using hormonal contraception from two family planning centers in Baltimore, MD. Upon study entry and 3, 6 and 12 months after the initial visit, participants were interviewed and received visual cervical examinations with photography. Ectopy was measured from digitized photographs and was analyzed both continuously and categorically (small [≤0.48 cm 2] vs. large [>0.48 cm 2]). Results: Of 1003 enrolled women, 802 returned for at least one follow-up visit. At 12 months, the numbers of women using COCs, DMPA or no hormonal method at least 50% of the time since the prior visit were 230, 76 and 229, respectively. After multivariable adjustment, COC use (vs. no hormonal use) was associated with large area of ectopy (odds ratio [OR]: 1.8, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.0-3.3). No significant relationship was observed between DMPA and large area of ectopy (OR: 0.5, 95% CI: 0.2-1.3). The incidence of large area of ectopy by contraceptive exposure (COC, DMPA or no hormonal method) was 17.4 (CI: 11.8-24.6), 10.9 (CI: 4.4-22.4) and 4.6 (CI: 2.2-8.4) per 100 woman-years, respectively. Conclusions: Use of COCs, but not DMPA, was associated with large area of cervical ectopy. Area of ectopy at baseline was the strongest predictor of area of ectopy at follow-up.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)512-519
Number of pages8
JournalContraception
Volume84
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Contraceptives, Oral, Combined
Medroxyprogesterone Acetate
Contraception
Confidence Intervals
Odds Ratio
Baltimore
Photography
Contraceptive Agents
Ambulatory Care Facilities
Incidence

Keywords

  • Cervical ectopia
  • Cervical ectropion
  • Cervix
  • COC
  • DMPA
  • Ectopy
  • Hormonal contraceptives

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Reproductive Medicine
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Bright, P. L., Norris Turner, A., Morrison, C. S., Wong, E. L., Kwok, C., Yacobson, I., ... Blumenthal, P. D. (2011). Hormonal contraception and area of cervical ectopy: A longitudinal assessment. Contraception, 84(5), 512-519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2011.02.002

Hormonal contraception and area of cervical ectopy : A longitudinal assessment. / Bright, Patricia L.; Norris Turner, Abigail; Morrison, Charles S.; Wong, Emelita L.; Kwok, Cynthia; Yacobson, Irina; Royce, Rachel A.; Tucker, Heidi O.; Blumenthal, Paul D.

In: Contraception, Vol. 84, No. 5, 11.2011, p. 512-519.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bright, PL, Norris Turner, A, Morrison, CS, Wong, EL, Kwok, C, Yacobson, I, Royce, RA, Tucker, HO & Blumenthal, PD 2011, 'Hormonal contraception and area of cervical ectopy: A longitudinal assessment', Contraception, vol. 84, no. 5, pp. 512-519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2011.02.002
Bright PL, Norris Turner A, Morrison CS, Wong EL, Kwok C, Yacobson I et al. Hormonal contraception and area of cervical ectopy: A longitudinal assessment. Contraception. 2011 Nov;84(5):512-519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2011.02.002
Bright, Patricia L. ; Norris Turner, Abigail ; Morrison, Charles S. ; Wong, Emelita L. ; Kwok, Cynthia ; Yacobson, Irina ; Royce, Rachel A. ; Tucker, Heidi O. ; Blumenthal, Paul D. / Hormonal contraception and area of cervical ectopy : A longitudinal assessment. In: Contraception. 2011 ; Vol. 84, No. 5. pp. 512-519.
@article{a7b4ff3485fa4f2a92abdbd67bd7e085,
title = "Hormonal contraception and area of cervical ectopy: A longitudinal assessment",
abstract = "Background: The effect of combined oral contraceptives (COCs) and depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) on the area of cervical ectopy is not well understood. Study Design: From 1996 to 1999, we recruited women not using hormonal contraception from two family planning centers in Baltimore, MD. Upon study entry and 3, 6 and 12 months after the initial visit, participants were interviewed and received visual cervical examinations with photography. Ectopy was measured from digitized photographs and was analyzed both continuously and categorically (small [≤0.48 cm 2] vs. large [>0.48 cm 2]). Results: Of 1003 enrolled women, 802 returned for at least one follow-up visit. At 12 months, the numbers of women using COCs, DMPA or no hormonal method at least 50{\%} of the time since the prior visit were 230, 76 and 229, respectively. After multivariable adjustment, COC use (vs. no hormonal use) was associated with large area of ectopy (odds ratio [OR]: 1.8, 95{\%} confidence interval [CI]: 1.0-3.3). No significant relationship was observed between DMPA and large area of ectopy (OR: 0.5, 95{\%} CI: 0.2-1.3). The incidence of large area of ectopy by contraceptive exposure (COC, DMPA or no hormonal method) was 17.4 (CI: 11.8-24.6), 10.9 (CI: 4.4-22.4) and 4.6 (CI: 2.2-8.4) per 100 woman-years, respectively. Conclusions: Use of COCs, but not DMPA, was associated with large area of cervical ectopy. Area of ectopy at baseline was the strongest predictor of area of ectopy at follow-up.",
keywords = "Cervical ectopia, Cervical ectropion, Cervix, COC, DMPA, Ectopy, Hormonal contraceptives",
author = "Bright, {Patricia L.} and {Norris Turner}, Abigail and Morrison, {Charles S.} and Wong, {Emelita L.} and Cynthia Kwok and Irina Yacobson and Royce, {Rachel A.} and Tucker, {Heidi O.} and Blumenthal, {Paul D.}",
year = "2011",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1016/j.contraception.2011.02.002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "84",
pages = "512--519",
journal = "Contraception",
issn = "0010-7824",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Hormonal contraception and area of cervical ectopy

T2 - A longitudinal assessment

AU - Bright, Patricia L.

AU - Norris Turner, Abigail

AU - Morrison, Charles S.

AU - Wong, Emelita L.

AU - Kwok, Cynthia

AU - Yacobson, Irina

AU - Royce, Rachel A.

AU - Tucker, Heidi O.

AU - Blumenthal, Paul D.

PY - 2011/11

Y1 - 2011/11

N2 - Background: The effect of combined oral contraceptives (COCs) and depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) on the area of cervical ectopy is not well understood. Study Design: From 1996 to 1999, we recruited women not using hormonal contraception from two family planning centers in Baltimore, MD. Upon study entry and 3, 6 and 12 months after the initial visit, participants were interviewed and received visual cervical examinations with photography. Ectopy was measured from digitized photographs and was analyzed both continuously and categorically (small [≤0.48 cm 2] vs. large [>0.48 cm 2]). Results: Of 1003 enrolled women, 802 returned for at least one follow-up visit. At 12 months, the numbers of women using COCs, DMPA or no hormonal method at least 50% of the time since the prior visit were 230, 76 and 229, respectively. After multivariable adjustment, COC use (vs. no hormonal use) was associated with large area of ectopy (odds ratio [OR]: 1.8, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.0-3.3). No significant relationship was observed between DMPA and large area of ectopy (OR: 0.5, 95% CI: 0.2-1.3). The incidence of large area of ectopy by contraceptive exposure (COC, DMPA or no hormonal method) was 17.4 (CI: 11.8-24.6), 10.9 (CI: 4.4-22.4) and 4.6 (CI: 2.2-8.4) per 100 woman-years, respectively. Conclusions: Use of COCs, but not DMPA, was associated with large area of cervical ectopy. Area of ectopy at baseline was the strongest predictor of area of ectopy at follow-up.

AB - Background: The effect of combined oral contraceptives (COCs) and depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) on the area of cervical ectopy is not well understood. Study Design: From 1996 to 1999, we recruited women not using hormonal contraception from two family planning centers in Baltimore, MD. Upon study entry and 3, 6 and 12 months after the initial visit, participants were interviewed and received visual cervical examinations with photography. Ectopy was measured from digitized photographs and was analyzed both continuously and categorically (small [≤0.48 cm 2] vs. large [>0.48 cm 2]). Results: Of 1003 enrolled women, 802 returned for at least one follow-up visit. At 12 months, the numbers of women using COCs, DMPA or no hormonal method at least 50% of the time since the prior visit were 230, 76 and 229, respectively. After multivariable adjustment, COC use (vs. no hormonal use) was associated with large area of ectopy (odds ratio [OR]: 1.8, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.0-3.3). No significant relationship was observed between DMPA and large area of ectopy (OR: 0.5, 95% CI: 0.2-1.3). The incidence of large area of ectopy by contraceptive exposure (COC, DMPA or no hormonal method) was 17.4 (CI: 11.8-24.6), 10.9 (CI: 4.4-22.4) and 4.6 (CI: 2.2-8.4) per 100 woman-years, respectively. Conclusions: Use of COCs, but not DMPA, was associated with large area of cervical ectopy. Area of ectopy at baseline was the strongest predictor of area of ectopy at follow-up.

KW - Cervical ectopia

KW - Cervical ectropion

KW - Cervix

KW - COC

KW - DMPA

KW - Ectopy

KW - Hormonal contraceptives

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80054919767&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80054919767&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.contraception.2011.02.002

DO - 10.1016/j.contraception.2011.02.002

M3 - Article

VL - 84

SP - 512

EP - 519

JO - Contraception

JF - Contraception

SN - 0010-7824

IS - 5

ER -