Holmium: YAG (λ=2120 nm) vs. Thulium fiber laser (λ=1908 nm) ablation of kidney stones: Thresholds, rates, and retropulsion

Richard L. Blackmon, Pierce B. Irby, Nathaniel M. Fried

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

The Holmium:YAG (Ho:YAG) laser lithotriptor is capable of operating at high pulse energies, but its efficient operation is limited to relatively low pulse rates (∼10 Hz) during lithotripsy. On the contrary, the Thulium Fiber Laser (TFL) is limited to low pulse energies, but can operate at very high pulse rates (up to 1000 Hz). This study compares stone ablation threshold, ablation rate, and retropulsion effects for different Ho:YAG and TFL operation modes. The TFL (λ=1908 nm) was operated with pulse energies of 5-35 mJ, 500-μs pulse duration, and pulse rates of 10-400 Hz. The Ho:YAG laser (λ=2120 nm) was operated with pulse energies of 30-550 mJ, 350-μs pulse duration, and pulse rate of 10 Hz. Laser energy was delivered through small-core (200-270-μm) optical fibers in contact mode with human calcium oxalate monohydrate (COM) stones for ablation studies and plaster-of-Paris stone phantoms for retropulsion studies. The COM stone ablation threshold for Ho:YAG and TFL measured 82.6 J/cm2and 20.8 J/cm2, respectively. Stone retropulsion with Ho:YAG laser increased linearly with pulse energy. Retropulsion with TFL was minimal at pulse rates <150 Hz, then rapidly increased at higher pulse rates. For minimal stone retropulsion, Ho:YAG operation at pulse energies <175 mJ at 10 Hz, and TFL operation at 35 mJ at 100 Hz is recommended, with both lasers producing comparable ablation rates. Further development of a TFL operating with both high pulse energies (e.g. 100-200 mJ) and high pulse rates (100-150 Hz) may also provide higher ablation rates, when retropulsion is not the primary concern.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationProgress in Biomedical Optics and Imaging - Proceedings of SPIE
Volume7883
DOIs
StatePublished - 2011
EventPhotonic Therapeutics and Diagnostics VII - San Francisco, CA, United States
Duration: Jan 22 2011Jan 24 2011

Other

OtherPhotonic Therapeutics and Diagnostics VII
CountryUnited States
CitySan Francisco, CA
Period1/22/111/24/11

Fingerprint

Thulium
Holmium
kidney stones
thulium
Kidney Calculi
holmium
pulse rate
Fiber lasers
Ablation
yttrium-aluminum garnet
ablation
fiber lasers
Laser pulses
Lasers
Heart Rate
thresholds
rocks
pulses
Solid-State Lasers
YAG lasers

Keywords

  • fiber laser
  • holmium
  • lithotripsy
  • retropulsion
  • thulium
  • urinary stones

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials
  • Biomaterials
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Blackmon, R. L., Irby, P. B., & Fried, N. M. (2011). Holmium: YAG (λ=2120 nm) vs. Thulium fiber laser (λ=1908 nm) ablation of kidney stones: Thresholds, rates, and retropulsion. In Progress in Biomedical Optics and Imaging - Proceedings of SPIE (Vol. 7883). [788318] https://doi.org/10.1117/12.873942

Holmium : YAG (λ=2120 nm) vs. Thulium fiber laser (λ=1908 nm) ablation of kidney stones: Thresholds, rates, and retropulsion. / Blackmon, Richard L.; Irby, Pierce B.; Fried, Nathaniel M.

Progress in Biomedical Optics and Imaging - Proceedings of SPIE. Vol. 7883 2011. 788318.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Blackmon, RL, Irby, PB & Fried, NM 2011, Holmium: YAG (λ=2120 nm) vs. Thulium fiber laser (λ=1908 nm) ablation of kidney stones: Thresholds, rates, and retropulsion. in Progress in Biomedical Optics and Imaging - Proceedings of SPIE. vol. 7883, 788318, Photonic Therapeutics and Diagnostics VII, San Francisco, CA, United States, 1/22/11. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.873942
Blackmon RL, Irby PB, Fried NM. Holmium: YAG (λ=2120 nm) vs. Thulium fiber laser (λ=1908 nm) ablation of kidney stones: Thresholds, rates, and retropulsion. In Progress in Biomedical Optics and Imaging - Proceedings of SPIE. Vol. 7883. 2011. 788318 https://doi.org/10.1117/12.873942
Blackmon, Richard L. ; Irby, Pierce B. ; Fried, Nathaniel M. / Holmium : YAG (λ=2120 nm) vs. Thulium fiber laser (λ=1908 nm) ablation of kidney stones: Thresholds, rates, and retropulsion. Progress in Biomedical Optics and Imaging - Proceedings of SPIE. Vol. 7883 2011.
@inproceedings{098fca70fad0497291669e6dbdc1fd21,
title = "Holmium: YAG (λ=2120 nm) vs. Thulium fiber laser (λ=1908 nm) ablation of kidney stones: Thresholds, rates, and retropulsion",
abstract = "The Holmium:YAG (Ho:YAG) laser lithotriptor is capable of operating at high pulse energies, but its efficient operation is limited to relatively low pulse rates (∼10 Hz) during lithotripsy. On the contrary, the Thulium Fiber Laser (TFL) is limited to low pulse energies, but can operate at very high pulse rates (up to 1000 Hz). This study compares stone ablation threshold, ablation rate, and retropulsion effects for different Ho:YAG and TFL operation modes. The TFL (λ=1908 nm) was operated with pulse energies of 5-35 mJ, 500-μs pulse duration, and pulse rates of 10-400 Hz. The Ho:YAG laser (λ=2120 nm) was operated with pulse energies of 30-550 mJ, 350-μs pulse duration, and pulse rate of 10 Hz. Laser energy was delivered through small-core (200-270-μm) optical fibers in contact mode with human calcium oxalate monohydrate (COM) stones for ablation studies and plaster-of-Paris stone phantoms for retropulsion studies. The COM stone ablation threshold for Ho:YAG and TFL measured 82.6 J/cm2and 20.8 J/cm2, respectively. Stone retropulsion with Ho:YAG laser increased linearly with pulse energy. Retropulsion with TFL was minimal at pulse rates <150 Hz, then rapidly increased at higher pulse rates. For minimal stone retropulsion, Ho:YAG operation at pulse energies <175 mJ at 10 Hz, and TFL operation at 35 mJ at 100 Hz is recommended, with both lasers producing comparable ablation rates. Further development of a TFL operating with both high pulse energies (e.g. 100-200 mJ) and high pulse rates (100-150 Hz) may also provide higher ablation rates, when retropulsion is not the primary concern.",
keywords = "fiber laser, holmium, lithotripsy, retropulsion, thulium, urinary stones",
author = "Blackmon, {Richard L.} and Irby, {Pierce B.} and Fried, {Nathaniel M.}",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.1117/12.873942",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780819484208",
volume = "7883",
booktitle = "Progress in Biomedical Optics and Imaging - Proceedings of SPIE",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Holmium

T2 - YAG (λ=2120 nm) vs. Thulium fiber laser (λ=1908 nm) ablation of kidney stones: Thresholds, rates, and retropulsion

AU - Blackmon, Richard L.

AU - Irby, Pierce B.

AU - Fried, Nathaniel M.

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - The Holmium:YAG (Ho:YAG) laser lithotriptor is capable of operating at high pulse energies, but its efficient operation is limited to relatively low pulse rates (∼10 Hz) during lithotripsy. On the contrary, the Thulium Fiber Laser (TFL) is limited to low pulse energies, but can operate at very high pulse rates (up to 1000 Hz). This study compares stone ablation threshold, ablation rate, and retropulsion effects for different Ho:YAG and TFL operation modes. The TFL (λ=1908 nm) was operated with pulse energies of 5-35 mJ, 500-μs pulse duration, and pulse rates of 10-400 Hz. The Ho:YAG laser (λ=2120 nm) was operated with pulse energies of 30-550 mJ, 350-μs pulse duration, and pulse rate of 10 Hz. Laser energy was delivered through small-core (200-270-μm) optical fibers in contact mode with human calcium oxalate monohydrate (COM) stones for ablation studies and plaster-of-Paris stone phantoms for retropulsion studies. The COM stone ablation threshold for Ho:YAG and TFL measured 82.6 J/cm2and 20.8 J/cm2, respectively. Stone retropulsion with Ho:YAG laser increased linearly with pulse energy. Retropulsion with TFL was minimal at pulse rates <150 Hz, then rapidly increased at higher pulse rates. For minimal stone retropulsion, Ho:YAG operation at pulse energies <175 mJ at 10 Hz, and TFL operation at 35 mJ at 100 Hz is recommended, with both lasers producing comparable ablation rates. Further development of a TFL operating with both high pulse energies (e.g. 100-200 mJ) and high pulse rates (100-150 Hz) may also provide higher ablation rates, when retropulsion is not the primary concern.

AB - The Holmium:YAG (Ho:YAG) laser lithotriptor is capable of operating at high pulse energies, but its efficient operation is limited to relatively low pulse rates (∼10 Hz) during lithotripsy. On the contrary, the Thulium Fiber Laser (TFL) is limited to low pulse energies, but can operate at very high pulse rates (up to 1000 Hz). This study compares stone ablation threshold, ablation rate, and retropulsion effects for different Ho:YAG and TFL operation modes. The TFL (λ=1908 nm) was operated with pulse energies of 5-35 mJ, 500-μs pulse duration, and pulse rates of 10-400 Hz. The Ho:YAG laser (λ=2120 nm) was operated with pulse energies of 30-550 mJ, 350-μs pulse duration, and pulse rate of 10 Hz. Laser energy was delivered through small-core (200-270-μm) optical fibers in contact mode with human calcium oxalate monohydrate (COM) stones for ablation studies and plaster-of-Paris stone phantoms for retropulsion studies. The COM stone ablation threshold for Ho:YAG and TFL measured 82.6 J/cm2and 20.8 J/cm2, respectively. Stone retropulsion with Ho:YAG laser increased linearly with pulse energy. Retropulsion with TFL was minimal at pulse rates <150 Hz, then rapidly increased at higher pulse rates. For minimal stone retropulsion, Ho:YAG operation at pulse energies <175 mJ at 10 Hz, and TFL operation at 35 mJ at 100 Hz is recommended, with both lasers producing comparable ablation rates. Further development of a TFL operating with both high pulse energies (e.g. 100-200 mJ) and high pulse rates (100-150 Hz) may also provide higher ablation rates, when retropulsion is not the primary concern.

KW - fiber laser

KW - holmium

KW - lithotripsy

KW - retropulsion

KW - thulium

KW - urinary stones

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79953749336&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79953749336&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1117/12.873942

DO - 10.1117/12.873942

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:79953749336

SN - 9780819484208

VL - 7883

BT - Progress in Biomedical Optics and Imaging - Proceedings of SPIE

ER -