His bundle pacing

Hemodynamics and clinical outcomes

Brijesh Patel, Jalaj Garg, Rahul Chaudhary, Naveen Sablani, Rahul Gupta, Mahek Shah, Talha Nazir, Babak Bozorgnia, Andrea Natale

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

From 1993 to 2009, nearly 2.9 million pacemakers were implanted in the United States; the majority of which were dual-chamber pacemakers. One of the major physiologic advantages of dual-chamber pacing over singlechamber ventricular pacing is atrioventricular synchrony, which prevents the pacemaker syndrome. However, patients who are pacemaker dependent or use right ventricle (RV) apical pacing more than 40% of the time are at a risk of developing heart failure from electromechanical dyssynchrony. Studies have also shown that RV pacing results in nonphysiological activation of the left ventricle, leading to adverse clinical outcomes. Hence, alternative pacing sites, including the RV outflow tract, the high-RV septal region, bi-ventricular pacing, or His bundle pacing, have been explored for a better physiological electromechanical coupling of the ventricles. Although His bundle pacing has gained attention due to favorable data and clinical outcomes, it has not gained widespread acceptance into clinical practice. Hence, we aim to review the current experience with His bundle pacing and its clinical implications in this article.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)201-206
Number of pages6
JournalCardiology in Review
Volume26
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Bundle of His
Heart Ventricles
Hemodynamics
Septum of Brain
Heart Failure

Keywords

  • His bundle
  • Nonselective His bundle pacing
  • QRS duration
  • Selective His bundle pacing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Patel, B., Garg, J., Chaudhary, R., Sablani, N., Gupta, R., Shah, M., ... Natale, A. (2018). His bundle pacing: Hemodynamics and clinical outcomes. Cardiology in Review, 26(4), 201-206. https://doi.org/10.1097/CRD.0000000000000191

His bundle pacing : Hemodynamics and clinical outcomes. / Patel, Brijesh; Garg, Jalaj; Chaudhary, Rahul; Sablani, Naveen; Gupta, Rahul; Shah, Mahek; Nazir, Talha; Bozorgnia, Babak; Natale, Andrea.

In: Cardiology in Review, Vol. 26, No. 4, 01.01.2018, p. 201-206.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Patel, B, Garg, J, Chaudhary, R, Sablani, N, Gupta, R, Shah, M, Nazir, T, Bozorgnia, B & Natale, A 2018, 'His bundle pacing: Hemodynamics and clinical outcomes', Cardiology in Review, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 201-206. https://doi.org/10.1097/CRD.0000000000000191
Patel B, Garg J, Chaudhary R, Sablani N, Gupta R, Shah M et al. His bundle pacing: Hemodynamics and clinical outcomes. Cardiology in Review. 2018 Jan 1;26(4):201-206. https://doi.org/10.1097/CRD.0000000000000191
Patel, Brijesh ; Garg, Jalaj ; Chaudhary, Rahul ; Sablani, Naveen ; Gupta, Rahul ; Shah, Mahek ; Nazir, Talha ; Bozorgnia, Babak ; Natale, Andrea. / His bundle pacing : Hemodynamics and clinical outcomes. In: Cardiology in Review. 2018 ; Vol. 26, No. 4. pp. 201-206.
@article{60646d94b00b4ef9a5f9993fa0ede93d,
title = "His bundle pacing: Hemodynamics and clinical outcomes",
abstract = "From 1993 to 2009, nearly 2.9 million pacemakers were implanted in the United States; the majority of which were dual-chamber pacemakers. One of the major physiologic advantages of dual-chamber pacing over singlechamber ventricular pacing is atrioventricular synchrony, which prevents the pacemaker syndrome. However, patients who are pacemaker dependent or use right ventricle (RV) apical pacing more than 40{\%} of the time are at a risk of developing heart failure from electromechanical dyssynchrony. Studies have also shown that RV pacing results in nonphysiological activation of the left ventricle, leading to adverse clinical outcomes. Hence, alternative pacing sites, including the RV outflow tract, the high-RV septal region, bi-ventricular pacing, or His bundle pacing, have been explored for a better physiological electromechanical coupling of the ventricles. Although His bundle pacing has gained attention due to favorable data and clinical outcomes, it has not gained widespread acceptance into clinical practice. Hence, we aim to review the current experience with His bundle pacing and its clinical implications in this article.",
keywords = "His bundle, Nonselective His bundle pacing, QRS duration, Selective His bundle pacing",
author = "Brijesh Patel and Jalaj Garg and Rahul Chaudhary and Naveen Sablani and Rahul Gupta and Mahek Shah and Talha Nazir and Babak Bozorgnia and Andrea Natale",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/CRD.0000000000000191",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "201--206",
journal = "Cardiology in Review",
issn = "1061-5377",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - His bundle pacing

T2 - Hemodynamics and clinical outcomes

AU - Patel, Brijesh

AU - Garg, Jalaj

AU - Chaudhary, Rahul

AU - Sablani, Naveen

AU - Gupta, Rahul

AU - Shah, Mahek

AU - Nazir, Talha

AU - Bozorgnia, Babak

AU - Natale, Andrea

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - From 1993 to 2009, nearly 2.9 million pacemakers were implanted in the United States; the majority of which were dual-chamber pacemakers. One of the major physiologic advantages of dual-chamber pacing over singlechamber ventricular pacing is atrioventricular synchrony, which prevents the pacemaker syndrome. However, patients who are pacemaker dependent or use right ventricle (RV) apical pacing more than 40% of the time are at a risk of developing heart failure from electromechanical dyssynchrony. Studies have also shown that RV pacing results in nonphysiological activation of the left ventricle, leading to adverse clinical outcomes. Hence, alternative pacing sites, including the RV outflow tract, the high-RV septal region, bi-ventricular pacing, or His bundle pacing, have been explored for a better physiological electromechanical coupling of the ventricles. Although His bundle pacing has gained attention due to favorable data and clinical outcomes, it has not gained widespread acceptance into clinical practice. Hence, we aim to review the current experience with His bundle pacing and its clinical implications in this article.

AB - From 1993 to 2009, nearly 2.9 million pacemakers were implanted in the United States; the majority of which were dual-chamber pacemakers. One of the major physiologic advantages of dual-chamber pacing over singlechamber ventricular pacing is atrioventricular synchrony, which prevents the pacemaker syndrome. However, patients who are pacemaker dependent or use right ventricle (RV) apical pacing more than 40% of the time are at a risk of developing heart failure from electromechanical dyssynchrony. Studies have also shown that RV pacing results in nonphysiological activation of the left ventricle, leading to adverse clinical outcomes. Hence, alternative pacing sites, including the RV outflow tract, the high-RV septal region, bi-ventricular pacing, or His bundle pacing, have been explored for a better physiological electromechanical coupling of the ventricles. Although His bundle pacing has gained attention due to favorable data and clinical outcomes, it has not gained widespread acceptance into clinical practice. Hence, we aim to review the current experience with His bundle pacing and its clinical implications in this article.

KW - His bundle

KW - Nonselective His bundle pacing

KW - QRS duration

KW - Selective His bundle pacing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85051748964&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85051748964&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/CRD.0000000000000191

DO - 10.1097/CRD.0000000000000191

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 201

EP - 206

JO - Cardiology in Review

JF - Cardiology in Review

SN - 1061-5377

IS - 4

ER -