High variability in radiologists' reporting practices for incidental thyroid nodules detected on CT and MRI

Jenny K. Hoang, A. Riofrio, M. R. Bashir, P. G. Kranz, J. D. Eastwood

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: There are no guidelines for reporting incidental thyroid nodules seen on CT and MR imaging. We evaluated radiologists' current reporting practices for incidental thyroid nodules detected on these imaging modalities. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Radiologists were surveyed regarding their reporting practices by using 14 scenarios of incidental thyroid nodules differing in size, patient demographics, and clinical history. Scenarios were evaluated for the following: 1) radiologists' most commonly selected response, and 2) the proportion of radiologists selecting that response (degree of agreement). These measures were used to determine how the patient scenario and characteristics of the radiologists affected variability in practice. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-three radiologists participated. In 8/14 scenarios, the most common response was to "recommend sonography." For the other scenarios, the most common response was to "report in only body of report." The overall mean agreement for the 14 scenarios was 53%, and agreement ranged from 36% to 75%. Smaller nodules had lower agreement: 43%-51% for 8-mm nodules compared with 64%-75% for 15-mm nodules. Agreement was poorest for the 10-mm nodule in a 60-year-old woman (36%) and for scenarios with additional history of lung cancer (39%) and multiple nodules (36%). There was no significant difference in reporting practices and agreement when radiologists were categorized by years of practice, practice type, and subspecialty (P > .55). CONCLUSIONS: The reporting practice for incidental thyroid nodules on CT or MR imaging is highly variable among radiologists, especially for patients with smaller nodules (≤10 mm) and patients with multiple nodules and a history of cancer. This variability highlights the need for practice guidelines.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1190-1194
Number of pages5
JournalAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology
Volume35
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Thyroid Nodule
Radiologists
Practice Guidelines
Ultrasonography
Lung Neoplasms
Demography
Guidelines

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

High variability in radiologists' reporting practices for incidental thyroid nodules detected on CT and MRI. / Hoang, Jenny K.; Riofrio, A.; Bashir, M. R.; Kranz, P. G.; Eastwood, J. D.

In: American Journal of Neuroradiology, Vol. 35, No. 6, 06.2014, p. 1190-1194.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hoang, Jenny K. ; Riofrio, A. ; Bashir, M. R. ; Kranz, P. G. ; Eastwood, J. D. / High variability in radiologists' reporting practices for incidental thyroid nodules detected on CT and MRI. In: American Journal of Neuroradiology. 2014 ; Vol. 35, No. 6. pp. 1190-1194.
@article{e1c4ea6587a3422b938822746c7e96d8,
title = "High variability in radiologists' reporting practices for incidental thyroid nodules detected on CT and MRI",
abstract = "BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: There are no guidelines for reporting incidental thyroid nodules seen on CT and MR imaging. We evaluated radiologists' current reporting practices for incidental thyroid nodules detected on these imaging modalities. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Radiologists were surveyed regarding their reporting practices by using 14 scenarios of incidental thyroid nodules differing in size, patient demographics, and clinical history. Scenarios were evaluated for the following: 1) radiologists' most commonly selected response, and 2) the proportion of radiologists selecting that response (degree of agreement). These measures were used to determine how the patient scenario and characteristics of the radiologists affected variability in practice. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-three radiologists participated. In 8/14 scenarios, the most common response was to {"}recommend sonography.{"} For the other scenarios, the most common response was to {"}report in only body of report.{"} The overall mean agreement for the 14 scenarios was 53{\%}, and agreement ranged from 36{\%} to 75{\%}. Smaller nodules had lower agreement: 43{\%}-51{\%} for 8-mm nodules compared with 64{\%}-75{\%} for 15-mm nodules. Agreement was poorest for the 10-mm nodule in a 60-year-old woman (36{\%}) and for scenarios with additional history of lung cancer (39{\%}) and multiple nodules (36{\%}). There was no significant difference in reporting practices and agreement when radiologists were categorized by years of practice, practice type, and subspecialty (P > .55). CONCLUSIONS: The reporting practice for incidental thyroid nodules on CT or MR imaging is highly variable among radiologists, especially for patients with smaller nodules (≤10 mm) and patients with multiple nodules and a history of cancer. This variability highlights the need for practice guidelines.",
author = "Hoang, {Jenny K.} and A. Riofrio and Bashir, {M. R.} and Kranz, {P. G.} and Eastwood, {J. D.}",
year = "2014",
month = "6",
doi = "10.3174/ajnr.A3834",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "35",
pages = "1190--1194",
journal = "American Journal of Neuroradiology",
issn = "0195-6108",
publisher = "American Society of Neuroradiology",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - High variability in radiologists' reporting practices for incidental thyroid nodules detected on CT and MRI

AU - Hoang, Jenny K.

AU - Riofrio, A.

AU - Bashir, M. R.

AU - Kranz, P. G.

AU - Eastwood, J. D.

PY - 2014/6

Y1 - 2014/6

N2 - BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: There are no guidelines for reporting incidental thyroid nodules seen on CT and MR imaging. We evaluated radiologists' current reporting practices for incidental thyroid nodules detected on these imaging modalities. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Radiologists were surveyed regarding their reporting practices by using 14 scenarios of incidental thyroid nodules differing in size, patient demographics, and clinical history. Scenarios were evaluated for the following: 1) radiologists' most commonly selected response, and 2) the proportion of radiologists selecting that response (degree of agreement). These measures were used to determine how the patient scenario and characteristics of the radiologists affected variability in practice. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-three radiologists participated. In 8/14 scenarios, the most common response was to "recommend sonography." For the other scenarios, the most common response was to "report in only body of report." The overall mean agreement for the 14 scenarios was 53%, and agreement ranged from 36% to 75%. Smaller nodules had lower agreement: 43%-51% for 8-mm nodules compared with 64%-75% for 15-mm nodules. Agreement was poorest for the 10-mm nodule in a 60-year-old woman (36%) and for scenarios with additional history of lung cancer (39%) and multiple nodules (36%). There was no significant difference in reporting practices and agreement when radiologists were categorized by years of practice, practice type, and subspecialty (P > .55). CONCLUSIONS: The reporting practice for incidental thyroid nodules on CT or MR imaging is highly variable among radiologists, especially for patients with smaller nodules (≤10 mm) and patients with multiple nodules and a history of cancer. This variability highlights the need for practice guidelines.

AB - BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: There are no guidelines for reporting incidental thyroid nodules seen on CT and MR imaging. We evaluated radiologists' current reporting practices for incidental thyroid nodules detected on these imaging modalities. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Radiologists were surveyed regarding their reporting practices by using 14 scenarios of incidental thyroid nodules differing in size, patient demographics, and clinical history. Scenarios were evaluated for the following: 1) radiologists' most commonly selected response, and 2) the proportion of radiologists selecting that response (degree of agreement). These measures were used to determine how the patient scenario and characteristics of the radiologists affected variability in practice. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-three radiologists participated. In 8/14 scenarios, the most common response was to "recommend sonography." For the other scenarios, the most common response was to "report in only body of report." The overall mean agreement for the 14 scenarios was 53%, and agreement ranged from 36% to 75%. Smaller nodules had lower agreement: 43%-51% for 8-mm nodules compared with 64%-75% for 15-mm nodules. Agreement was poorest for the 10-mm nodule in a 60-year-old woman (36%) and for scenarios with additional history of lung cancer (39%) and multiple nodules (36%). There was no significant difference in reporting practices and agreement when radiologists were categorized by years of practice, practice type, and subspecialty (P > .55). CONCLUSIONS: The reporting practice for incidental thyroid nodules on CT or MR imaging is highly variable among radiologists, especially for patients with smaller nodules (≤10 mm) and patients with multiple nodules and a history of cancer. This variability highlights the need for practice guidelines.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84902341982&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84902341982&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3174/ajnr.A3834

DO - 10.3174/ajnr.A3834

M3 - Article

C2 - 24407274

AN - SCOPUS:84902341982

VL - 35

SP - 1190

EP - 1194

JO - American Journal of Neuroradiology

JF - American Journal of Neuroradiology

SN - 0195-6108

IS - 6

ER -