High-dose oxytocin

20- versus 40-minute dosage interval

Andrew Satin, Kenneth J. Leveno, M. Lynne Sherman, Donald McIntire

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether an increase in the oxytocin dosing interval would decrease the incidence of uterine hyperstimulation. Methods: This study included 1801 consecutive pregnancies receiving high-dose oxytocin. Oxytocin was used for labor augmentation in 1167 and induction in 634 women. Twenty- and 40-minute dosage intervals were compared. The study period was based on an 80% likelihood of detecting 5 and 10% differences in the cesarean and hyperstimulation rates, respectively. Statistics were analyzed with χ2, Fisher, and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests where appropriate. Multivariate logistic regression and analysis of covariance were used to control for confounding demographic variables. Results: Comparison of the 20- and 40-minute regimens for labor induction yielded no differences in the rates of cesarean delivery for dystocia (16 versus 19%) or fetal distress (5 versus 6%). The 20-minute regimen for augmentation was associated with a significant reduction in cesarean for dystocia (8 versus 12%; P =.05). The incidence of uterine hyperstimulation was greater with the 20-minute than the 40-minute regimen for induction (40 versus 31%; P =.02), but not for augmentation (31 versus 28%). Neonatal outcomes were unaffected by the dosage interval for both augmentation and induction. Conclusion: A 40-minute dosing interval for high-dose oxytocin offers no clear advantage over a 20-minute interval. Both regimens were safe and efficient, with no differences in perinatal outcome. The 20-minute interval was associated with fewer cesareans for dystocia when used for labor augmentation, whereas the 40-minute interval resulted in less hyperstimulation when used for labor induction.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)234-238
Number of pages5
JournalObstetrics and Gynecology
Volume83
Issue number2
StatePublished - 1994
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Oxytocin
Dystocia
Induced Labor
Nonparametric Statistics
Fetal Distress
Confounding Factors (Epidemiology)
Incidence
Logistic Models
Regression Analysis
Demography
Pregnancy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Satin, A., Leveno, K. J., Sherman, M. L., & McIntire, D. (1994). High-dose oxytocin: 20- versus 40-minute dosage interval. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 83(2), 234-238.

High-dose oxytocin : 20- versus 40-minute dosage interval. / Satin, Andrew; Leveno, Kenneth J.; Sherman, M. Lynne; McIntire, Donald.

In: Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vol. 83, No. 2, 1994, p. 234-238.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Satin, A, Leveno, KJ, Sherman, ML & McIntire, D 1994, 'High-dose oxytocin: 20- versus 40-minute dosage interval', Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 83, no. 2, pp. 234-238.
Satin A, Leveno KJ, Sherman ML, McIntire D. High-dose oxytocin: 20- versus 40-minute dosage interval. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1994;83(2):234-238.
Satin, Andrew ; Leveno, Kenneth J. ; Sherman, M. Lynne ; McIntire, Donald. / High-dose oxytocin : 20- versus 40-minute dosage interval. In: Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1994 ; Vol. 83, No. 2. pp. 234-238.
@article{6dcc66c262c74389ab972d176ef7c93d,
title = "High-dose oxytocin: 20- versus 40-minute dosage interval",
abstract = "Objective: To determine whether an increase in the oxytocin dosing interval would decrease the incidence of uterine hyperstimulation. Methods: This study included 1801 consecutive pregnancies receiving high-dose oxytocin. Oxytocin was used for labor augmentation in 1167 and induction in 634 women. Twenty- and 40-minute dosage intervals were compared. The study period was based on an 80{\%} likelihood of detecting 5 and 10{\%} differences in the cesarean and hyperstimulation rates, respectively. Statistics were analyzed with χ2, Fisher, and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests where appropriate. Multivariate logistic regression and analysis of covariance were used to control for confounding demographic variables. Results: Comparison of the 20- and 40-minute regimens for labor induction yielded no differences in the rates of cesarean delivery for dystocia (16 versus 19{\%}) or fetal distress (5 versus 6{\%}). The 20-minute regimen for augmentation was associated with a significant reduction in cesarean for dystocia (8 versus 12{\%}; P =.05). The incidence of uterine hyperstimulation was greater with the 20-minute than the 40-minute regimen for induction (40 versus 31{\%}; P =.02), but not for augmentation (31 versus 28{\%}). Neonatal outcomes were unaffected by the dosage interval for both augmentation and induction. Conclusion: A 40-minute dosing interval for high-dose oxytocin offers no clear advantage over a 20-minute interval. Both regimens were safe and efficient, with no differences in perinatal outcome. The 20-minute interval was associated with fewer cesareans for dystocia when used for labor augmentation, whereas the 40-minute interval resulted in less hyperstimulation when used for labor induction.",
author = "Andrew Satin and Leveno, {Kenneth J.} and Sherman, {M. Lynne} and Donald McIntire",
year = "1994",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "83",
pages = "234--238",
journal = "Obstetrics and Gynecology",
issn = "0029-7844",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - High-dose oxytocin

T2 - 20- versus 40-minute dosage interval

AU - Satin, Andrew

AU - Leveno, Kenneth J.

AU - Sherman, M. Lynne

AU - McIntire, Donald

PY - 1994

Y1 - 1994

N2 - Objective: To determine whether an increase in the oxytocin dosing interval would decrease the incidence of uterine hyperstimulation. Methods: This study included 1801 consecutive pregnancies receiving high-dose oxytocin. Oxytocin was used for labor augmentation in 1167 and induction in 634 women. Twenty- and 40-minute dosage intervals were compared. The study period was based on an 80% likelihood of detecting 5 and 10% differences in the cesarean and hyperstimulation rates, respectively. Statistics were analyzed with χ2, Fisher, and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests where appropriate. Multivariate logistic regression and analysis of covariance were used to control for confounding demographic variables. Results: Comparison of the 20- and 40-minute regimens for labor induction yielded no differences in the rates of cesarean delivery for dystocia (16 versus 19%) or fetal distress (5 versus 6%). The 20-minute regimen for augmentation was associated with a significant reduction in cesarean for dystocia (8 versus 12%; P =.05). The incidence of uterine hyperstimulation was greater with the 20-minute than the 40-minute regimen for induction (40 versus 31%; P =.02), but not for augmentation (31 versus 28%). Neonatal outcomes were unaffected by the dosage interval for both augmentation and induction. Conclusion: A 40-minute dosing interval for high-dose oxytocin offers no clear advantage over a 20-minute interval. Both regimens were safe and efficient, with no differences in perinatal outcome. The 20-minute interval was associated with fewer cesareans for dystocia when used for labor augmentation, whereas the 40-minute interval resulted in less hyperstimulation when used for labor induction.

AB - Objective: To determine whether an increase in the oxytocin dosing interval would decrease the incidence of uterine hyperstimulation. Methods: This study included 1801 consecutive pregnancies receiving high-dose oxytocin. Oxytocin was used for labor augmentation in 1167 and induction in 634 women. Twenty- and 40-minute dosage intervals were compared. The study period was based on an 80% likelihood of detecting 5 and 10% differences in the cesarean and hyperstimulation rates, respectively. Statistics were analyzed with χ2, Fisher, and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests where appropriate. Multivariate logistic regression and analysis of covariance were used to control for confounding demographic variables. Results: Comparison of the 20- and 40-minute regimens for labor induction yielded no differences in the rates of cesarean delivery for dystocia (16 versus 19%) or fetal distress (5 versus 6%). The 20-minute regimen for augmentation was associated with a significant reduction in cesarean for dystocia (8 versus 12%; P =.05). The incidence of uterine hyperstimulation was greater with the 20-minute than the 40-minute regimen for induction (40 versus 31%; P =.02), but not for augmentation (31 versus 28%). Neonatal outcomes were unaffected by the dosage interval for both augmentation and induction. Conclusion: A 40-minute dosing interval for high-dose oxytocin offers no clear advantage over a 20-minute interval. Both regimens were safe and efficient, with no differences in perinatal outcome. The 20-minute interval was associated with fewer cesareans for dystocia when used for labor augmentation, whereas the 40-minute interval resulted in less hyperstimulation when used for labor induction.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027955302&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0027955302&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 83

SP - 234

EP - 238

JO - Obstetrics and Gynecology

JF - Obstetrics and Gynecology

SN - 0029-7844

IS - 2

ER -