Heterogeneity among smokers and non-smokers in attitudes and behaviour regarding smoking and smoking restrictions

Blake D. Poland, Joanna E Cohen, Mary J. Ashley, Ed Adlaf, Roberta Ferrence, Linda L. Pederson, Shelley B. Bull, Dennis Raphael

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective - To determine if smokers and non-smokers cluster into meaningful, discrete subgroups with distinguishable attitudes and behaviours regarding smoking and smoking restrictions. Design - Qualitative research with 45 smokers guided development of questionnaire items applied in a population based telephone survey of 432 current smokers and 1332 non-smokers in Ontario, Canada. Methods - Cluster analysis of questionnaire items used to categorise adult smokers and non-smokers; comparison of clusters on sociodemographic characteristics and composite knowledge and attitude scores. Results - Smokers clustered in three groups. "Reluctant" smokers (16%) show more concern about other people discovering that they smoke, but parallel "easygoing" smokers (42%) in supporting restrictions on smoking and not smoking around others. "Adamant" smokers (42%) feel restrictions have gone too far, and are less likely to accommodate non-smokers. Significant gradients across categories in the expected direction were observed with respect to smoking status, stage of change, knowledge, and attitude scores, and predicted compliance with restrictions, validating the proposed typology. Non-smokers also clustered into three groups, of which the "adamant" non-smokers (45%) are the least favourably disposed to smoking. "Unempowered" non-smokers (34%) also oppose smoking, but tend not to act on it. "Laissez-faire" non-smokers (21%) are less opposed to smoking in both attitude and behaviour. A significant gradient across categories in the expected direction was observed with respect to composite scores regarding knowledge of the health effects of active and passive smoking and a composite score on support for restrictions on smoking in public places. Conclusion - Recognition and consideration of the types of smokers and non-smokers in the population and their distinguishing characteristics could inform the development of tobacco control policies and programmes and suggest strategies to assist implementation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)364-371
Number of pages8
JournalTobacco Control
Volume9
Issue number4
StatePublished - 2000
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

smoking
Smoking
Tobacco Smoke Pollution
Qualitative Research
Ontario
questionnaire
Telephone
Smoke
Population
Tobacco
Canada
cluster analysis
Cluster Analysis
nicotine
telephone
qualitative research
typology
Group
Health
health

Keywords

  • Attitudes
  • Cluster
  • Non-smokers
  • Smokers
  • Smoking restrictions
  • Typology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Health Policy
  • Epidemiology

Cite this

Poland, B. D., Cohen, J. E., Ashley, M. J., Adlaf, E., Ferrence, R., Pederson, L. L., ... Raphael, D. (2000). Heterogeneity among smokers and non-smokers in attitudes and behaviour regarding smoking and smoking restrictions. Tobacco Control, 9(4), 364-371.

Heterogeneity among smokers and non-smokers in attitudes and behaviour regarding smoking and smoking restrictions. / Poland, Blake D.; Cohen, Joanna E; Ashley, Mary J.; Adlaf, Ed; Ferrence, Roberta; Pederson, Linda L.; Bull, Shelley B.; Raphael, Dennis.

In: Tobacco Control, Vol. 9, No. 4, 2000, p. 364-371.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Poland, BD, Cohen, JE, Ashley, MJ, Adlaf, E, Ferrence, R, Pederson, LL, Bull, SB & Raphael, D 2000, 'Heterogeneity among smokers and non-smokers in attitudes and behaviour regarding smoking and smoking restrictions', Tobacco Control, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 364-371.
Poland, Blake D. ; Cohen, Joanna E ; Ashley, Mary J. ; Adlaf, Ed ; Ferrence, Roberta ; Pederson, Linda L. ; Bull, Shelley B. ; Raphael, Dennis. / Heterogeneity among smokers and non-smokers in attitudes and behaviour regarding smoking and smoking restrictions. In: Tobacco Control. 2000 ; Vol. 9, No. 4. pp. 364-371.
@article{e3c61b4f5e1448b395870832d5df8712,
title = "Heterogeneity among smokers and non-smokers in attitudes and behaviour regarding smoking and smoking restrictions",
abstract = "Objective - To determine if smokers and non-smokers cluster into meaningful, discrete subgroups with distinguishable attitudes and behaviours regarding smoking and smoking restrictions. Design - Qualitative research with 45 smokers guided development of questionnaire items applied in a population based telephone survey of 432 current smokers and 1332 non-smokers in Ontario, Canada. Methods - Cluster analysis of questionnaire items used to categorise adult smokers and non-smokers; comparison of clusters on sociodemographic characteristics and composite knowledge and attitude scores. Results - Smokers clustered in three groups. {"}Reluctant{"} smokers (16{\%}) show more concern about other people discovering that they smoke, but parallel {"}easygoing{"} smokers (42{\%}) in supporting restrictions on smoking and not smoking around others. {"}Adamant{"} smokers (42{\%}) feel restrictions have gone too far, and are less likely to accommodate non-smokers. Significant gradients across categories in the expected direction were observed with respect to smoking status, stage of change, knowledge, and attitude scores, and predicted compliance with restrictions, validating the proposed typology. Non-smokers also clustered into three groups, of which the {"}adamant{"} non-smokers (45{\%}) are the least favourably disposed to smoking. {"}Unempowered{"} non-smokers (34{\%}) also oppose smoking, but tend not to act on it. {"}Laissez-faire{"} non-smokers (21{\%}) are less opposed to smoking in both attitude and behaviour. A significant gradient across categories in the expected direction was observed with respect to composite scores regarding knowledge of the health effects of active and passive smoking and a composite score on support for restrictions on smoking in public places. Conclusion - Recognition and consideration of the types of smokers and non-smokers in the population and their distinguishing characteristics could inform the development of tobacco control policies and programmes and suggest strategies to assist implementation.",
keywords = "Attitudes, Cluster, Non-smokers, Smokers, Smoking restrictions, Typology",
author = "Poland, {Blake D.} and Cohen, {Joanna E} and Ashley, {Mary J.} and Ed Adlaf and Roberta Ferrence and Pederson, {Linda L.} and Bull, {Shelley B.} and Dennis Raphael",
year = "2000",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
pages = "364--371",
journal = "Tobacco Control",
issn = "0964-4563",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Heterogeneity among smokers and non-smokers in attitudes and behaviour regarding smoking and smoking restrictions

AU - Poland, Blake D.

AU - Cohen, Joanna E

AU - Ashley, Mary J.

AU - Adlaf, Ed

AU - Ferrence, Roberta

AU - Pederson, Linda L.

AU - Bull, Shelley B.

AU - Raphael, Dennis

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

N2 - Objective - To determine if smokers and non-smokers cluster into meaningful, discrete subgroups with distinguishable attitudes and behaviours regarding smoking and smoking restrictions. Design - Qualitative research with 45 smokers guided development of questionnaire items applied in a population based telephone survey of 432 current smokers and 1332 non-smokers in Ontario, Canada. Methods - Cluster analysis of questionnaire items used to categorise adult smokers and non-smokers; comparison of clusters on sociodemographic characteristics and composite knowledge and attitude scores. Results - Smokers clustered in three groups. "Reluctant" smokers (16%) show more concern about other people discovering that they smoke, but parallel "easygoing" smokers (42%) in supporting restrictions on smoking and not smoking around others. "Adamant" smokers (42%) feel restrictions have gone too far, and are less likely to accommodate non-smokers. Significant gradients across categories in the expected direction were observed with respect to smoking status, stage of change, knowledge, and attitude scores, and predicted compliance with restrictions, validating the proposed typology. Non-smokers also clustered into three groups, of which the "adamant" non-smokers (45%) are the least favourably disposed to smoking. "Unempowered" non-smokers (34%) also oppose smoking, but tend not to act on it. "Laissez-faire" non-smokers (21%) are less opposed to smoking in both attitude and behaviour. A significant gradient across categories in the expected direction was observed with respect to composite scores regarding knowledge of the health effects of active and passive smoking and a composite score on support for restrictions on smoking in public places. Conclusion - Recognition and consideration of the types of smokers and non-smokers in the population and their distinguishing characteristics could inform the development of tobacco control policies and programmes and suggest strategies to assist implementation.

AB - Objective - To determine if smokers and non-smokers cluster into meaningful, discrete subgroups with distinguishable attitudes and behaviours regarding smoking and smoking restrictions. Design - Qualitative research with 45 smokers guided development of questionnaire items applied in a population based telephone survey of 432 current smokers and 1332 non-smokers in Ontario, Canada. Methods - Cluster analysis of questionnaire items used to categorise adult smokers and non-smokers; comparison of clusters on sociodemographic characteristics and composite knowledge and attitude scores. Results - Smokers clustered in three groups. "Reluctant" smokers (16%) show more concern about other people discovering that they smoke, but parallel "easygoing" smokers (42%) in supporting restrictions on smoking and not smoking around others. "Adamant" smokers (42%) feel restrictions have gone too far, and are less likely to accommodate non-smokers. Significant gradients across categories in the expected direction were observed with respect to smoking status, stage of change, knowledge, and attitude scores, and predicted compliance with restrictions, validating the proposed typology. Non-smokers also clustered into three groups, of which the "adamant" non-smokers (45%) are the least favourably disposed to smoking. "Unempowered" non-smokers (34%) also oppose smoking, but tend not to act on it. "Laissez-faire" non-smokers (21%) are less opposed to smoking in both attitude and behaviour. A significant gradient across categories in the expected direction was observed with respect to composite scores regarding knowledge of the health effects of active and passive smoking and a composite score on support for restrictions on smoking in public places. Conclusion - Recognition and consideration of the types of smokers and non-smokers in the population and their distinguishing characteristics could inform the development of tobacco control policies and programmes and suggest strategies to assist implementation.

KW - Attitudes

KW - Cluster

KW - Non-smokers

KW - Smokers

KW - Smoking restrictions

KW - Typology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034571938&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034571938&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 11106705

AN - SCOPUS:0034571938

VL - 9

SP - 364

EP - 371

JO - Tobacco Control

JF - Tobacco Control

SN - 0964-4563

IS - 4

ER -