Hepatitis C Virus Postexposure prophylaxis in the healthcare worker: Why direct-acting antivirals don't change a thing

Susanna Naggie, David P. Holland, Mark S. Sulkowski, David L. Thomas

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

13 Scopus citations

Abstract

Currently, 380 000-400 000 occupational exposures to blood-borne pathogens occur annually in the United States. The management for occupational HIV or hepatitis B virus exposures includes postexposure prophylaxis (PEP) when necessary; however, PEP is not recommended for hepatitis C virus (HCV) exposures. Recent approval of HCV direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) has renewed discussions as to whether these therapies could be used to prevent infection after exposure. There are no published studies addressing this question, but the prescribing of DAAs for PEP has been reported. We will discuss the differences in transmission of the 3 most common blood-borne pathogens, the natural history of early HCV infection, and the scientific rationale for PEP. In particular, we will discuss how the low feasibility of conducting an adequately powered clinical trial of DAA use for PEP and the low costeffectiveness of such an intervention is not supportive of targeting limited resources for such use.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)92-99
Number of pages8
JournalClinical Infectious Diseases
Volume64
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017

Keywords

  • Cost-analysis
  • Direct acting antivirals
  • Hepatitis c virus
  • Occupational exposure
  • Postexposure prophylaxis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Microbiology (medical)
  • Infectious Diseases

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Hepatitis C Virus Postexposure prophylaxis in the healthcare worker: Why direct-acting antivirals don't change a thing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this