Hemispherectomy: A review

Benjamin Solomon, Jeremy A. Lauer, Michael Guarnieri

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

First described in the 1920s, hemispherectomies (HS) had an extraordinary impact on the practice of neurosurgery as well as on the understanding of the developing nervous system. Few people would have predicted that a patient would survive such an extensive resection. That patients survived, and that the effects were not much worse than a severe stroke, dramatically challenged the fledgling neuroscience community. Here was a clinical result that called for an entire reexamination of the theories of localization, plasticity, handedness, and development. However, the operation failed its initial goal. HS could not cure brain cancer, and it offered no long-term survival benefit. The procedure would have disappeared except that another pioneer, McKenzie in Canada, saw that Dandy's 'last resort' operation for brain tumors could be applied to infantile hemiplegia and intractable epilepsy. Krynauw's description of 12 cases subsequently became the basis for the use of HS in children. Initial results were remarkable and gratifying. Seizures stopped. Children became free of medications and could reestablish happy lives. This picture of enthusiasm gradually changed to concern, then outright pessimism, after long-term studies indicated that the initial period of wellness could be followed in 6-8 years by a progressive neurological decline and death. Autopsies showed brain stem shifts and slow intracranial bleeding leading to hydrocephalus and hemosiderosis. The literature today contains numerous warnings about the sequelae of HS. The third generation of HS began in the 1970s. Qualified observers considered that the long-term side effects could be surgically managed. Moreover, the operation remained the viable option for the relief of intractable seizures. Several third-generation case series recently have been published. It is important to compare results, for there are notable differences in the surgical approach at various centers. Even within a given series, surgical methods, including anesthetic techniques, may change as reports appear and personal contacts share information.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)155-175
Number of pages21
JournalNeurosurgery Quarterly
Volume6
Issue number3
StatePublished - 1996

Fingerprint

Hemispherectomy
Brain Neoplasms
Seizures
Hemosiderosis
Functional Laterality
Hemiplegia
Neurosurgery
Hydrocephalus
Neurosciences
Nervous System
Brain Stem
Canada
Anesthetics
Autopsy
Stroke
Hemorrhage
Survival

Keywords

  • Epilepsy surgery
  • Hemicorticectomy
  • Hemimegalencephaly
  • Hemispherectomy
  • Infantile hemiplegia
  • Sturge-Weber syndrome

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Solomon, B., Lauer, J. A., & Guarnieri, M. (1996). Hemispherectomy: A review. Neurosurgery Quarterly, 6(3), 155-175.

Hemispherectomy : A review. / Solomon, Benjamin; Lauer, Jeremy A.; Guarnieri, Michael.

In: Neurosurgery Quarterly, Vol. 6, No. 3, 1996, p. 155-175.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Solomon, B, Lauer, JA & Guarnieri, M 1996, 'Hemispherectomy: A review', Neurosurgery Quarterly, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 155-175.
Solomon B, Lauer JA, Guarnieri M. Hemispherectomy: A review. Neurosurgery Quarterly. 1996;6(3):155-175.
Solomon, Benjamin ; Lauer, Jeremy A. ; Guarnieri, Michael. / Hemispherectomy : A review. In: Neurosurgery Quarterly. 1996 ; Vol. 6, No. 3. pp. 155-175.
@article{91f4010886c94ff580172749f79a5853,
title = "Hemispherectomy: A review",
abstract = "First described in the 1920s, hemispherectomies (HS) had an extraordinary impact on the practice of neurosurgery as well as on the understanding of the developing nervous system. Few people would have predicted that a patient would survive such an extensive resection. That patients survived, and that the effects were not much worse than a severe stroke, dramatically challenged the fledgling neuroscience community. Here was a clinical result that called for an entire reexamination of the theories of localization, plasticity, handedness, and development. However, the operation failed its initial goal. HS could not cure brain cancer, and it offered no long-term survival benefit. The procedure would have disappeared except that another pioneer, McKenzie in Canada, saw that Dandy's 'last resort' operation for brain tumors could be applied to infantile hemiplegia and intractable epilepsy. Krynauw's description of 12 cases subsequently became the basis for the use of HS in children. Initial results were remarkable and gratifying. Seizures stopped. Children became free of medications and could reestablish happy lives. This picture of enthusiasm gradually changed to concern, then outright pessimism, after long-term studies indicated that the initial period of wellness could be followed in 6-8 years by a progressive neurological decline and death. Autopsies showed brain stem shifts and slow intracranial bleeding leading to hydrocephalus and hemosiderosis. The literature today contains numerous warnings about the sequelae of HS. The third generation of HS began in the 1970s. Qualified observers considered that the long-term side effects could be surgically managed. Moreover, the operation remained the viable option for the relief of intractable seizures. Several third-generation case series recently have been published. It is important to compare results, for there are notable differences in the surgical approach at various centers. Even within a given series, surgical methods, including anesthetic techniques, may change as reports appear and personal contacts share information.",
keywords = "Epilepsy surgery, Hemicorticectomy, Hemimegalencephaly, Hemispherectomy, Infantile hemiplegia, Sturge-Weber syndrome",
author = "Benjamin Solomon and Lauer, {Jeremy A.} and Michael Guarnieri",
year = "1996",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
pages = "155--175",
journal = "Neurosurgery Quarterly",
issn = "1050-6438",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Hemispherectomy

T2 - A review

AU - Solomon, Benjamin

AU - Lauer, Jeremy A.

AU - Guarnieri, Michael

PY - 1996

Y1 - 1996

N2 - First described in the 1920s, hemispherectomies (HS) had an extraordinary impact on the practice of neurosurgery as well as on the understanding of the developing nervous system. Few people would have predicted that a patient would survive such an extensive resection. That patients survived, and that the effects were not much worse than a severe stroke, dramatically challenged the fledgling neuroscience community. Here was a clinical result that called for an entire reexamination of the theories of localization, plasticity, handedness, and development. However, the operation failed its initial goal. HS could not cure brain cancer, and it offered no long-term survival benefit. The procedure would have disappeared except that another pioneer, McKenzie in Canada, saw that Dandy's 'last resort' operation for brain tumors could be applied to infantile hemiplegia and intractable epilepsy. Krynauw's description of 12 cases subsequently became the basis for the use of HS in children. Initial results were remarkable and gratifying. Seizures stopped. Children became free of medications and could reestablish happy lives. This picture of enthusiasm gradually changed to concern, then outright pessimism, after long-term studies indicated that the initial period of wellness could be followed in 6-8 years by a progressive neurological decline and death. Autopsies showed brain stem shifts and slow intracranial bleeding leading to hydrocephalus and hemosiderosis. The literature today contains numerous warnings about the sequelae of HS. The third generation of HS began in the 1970s. Qualified observers considered that the long-term side effects could be surgically managed. Moreover, the operation remained the viable option for the relief of intractable seizures. Several third-generation case series recently have been published. It is important to compare results, for there are notable differences in the surgical approach at various centers. Even within a given series, surgical methods, including anesthetic techniques, may change as reports appear and personal contacts share information.

AB - First described in the 1920s, hemispherectomies (HS) had an extraordinary impact on the practice of neurosurgery as well as on the understanding of the developing nervous system. Few people would have predicted that a patient would survive such an extensive resection. That patients survived, and that the effects were not much worse than a severe stroke, dramatically challenged the fledgling neuroscience community. Here was a clinical result that called for an entire reexamination of the theories of localization, plasticity, handedness, and development. However, the operation failed its initial goal. HS could not cure brain cancer, and it offered no long-term survival benefit. The procedure would have disappeared except that another pioneer, McKenzie in Canada, saw that Dandy's 'last resort' operation for brain tumors could be applied to infantile hemiplegia and intractable epilepsy. Krynauw's description of 12 cases subsequently became the basis for the use of HS in children. Initial results were remarkable and gratifying. Seizures stopped. Children became free of medications and could reestablish happy lives. This picture of enthusiasm gradually changed to concern, then outright pessimism, after long-term studies indicated that the initial period of wellness could be followed in 6-8 years by a progressive neurological decline and death. Autopsies showed brain stem shifts and slow intracranial bleeding leading to hydrocephalus and hemosiderosis. The literature today contains numerous warnings about the sequelae of HS. The third generation of HS began in the 1970s. Qualified observers considered that the long-term side effects could be surgically managed. Moreover, the operation remained the viable option for the relief of intractable seizures. Several third-generation case series recently have been published. It is important to compare results, for there are notable differences in the surgical approach at various centers. Even within a given series, surgical methods, including anesthetic techniques, may change as reports appear and personal contacts share information.

KW - Epilepsy surgery

KW - Hemicorticectomy

KW - Hemimegalencephaly

KW - Hemispherectomy

KW - Infantile hemiplegia

KW - Sturge-Weber syndrome

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029833060&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029833060&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0029833060

VL - 6

SP - 155

EP - 175

JO - Neurosurgery Quarterly

JF - Neurosurgery Quarterly

SN - 1050-6438

IS - 3

ER -