Hearing loss and falls: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Nicole Tin Lok Jiam, Carol Li, Yuri Agrawal

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

77 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Falls are a devastating condition in older individuals. Identifying potentially modifiable risk factors such as hearing loss would provide a substantial public health benefit. Objective: To evaluate the current evidence for an association between hearing loss and falls risk. Data Sources: A systematic search of PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases was performed in July 2014. Study Eligibility: Studies were eligible for inclusion if they were published in the peer-reviewed literature. All studies used a predetermined definition of hearing loss. Main outcomes and measurements were fall hospitalization records or self-reports of falls by structured interview or validated questionnaires. Study Appraisal and Synthesis: Two investigators independently reviewed the literature related to hearing loss, falls, and older adults. We pooled effect sizes from across the studies and performed a meta-analysis to compute an overall effect size. Results and Limitations: Twelve eligible studies were identified. The odds of falling were 2.39 times greater among older adults with hearing loss than older adults with normal hearing (pooled odds ratio 2.39, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.11-2.68). In sensitivity analyses, we restricted the meta-analysis to studies where hearing loss was audiometrically defined (N = 6) and observed hearing loss to be associated with a 69% increase in the odds of falling (pooled odds ratio 1.69, 95% CI: 1.18-2.19). When we further limited to studies that also performed multivariate regression analyses (N = 4), the overall effect size did not appreciably change (pooled odds ratio 1.72, 95% CI: 1.07-2.37). We observed a potential positive publication bias in the literature. Limitations of the systematic review and meta-analysis are the cross-sectional designs of most studies and the heterogeneity across studies (Q = 631, P <.05, I2 = 98.1%). Conclusions and Relevance: In the published literature, hearing loss is associated with a significantly increased odds of falling in older adults. These findings need to be interpreted in light of the potential for positive publication bias in the literature on this topic. Level of Evidence: NA Laryngoscope, 126:2587–2596, 2016.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2587-2596
Number of pages10
JournalLaryngoscope
Volume126
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2016

Keywords

  • Hearing loss
  • falls
  • meta-analysis
  • older adults
  • risk factors
  • systematic review

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Hearing loss and falls: A systematic review and meta-analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this