Health information technology: Fallacies and sober realities

Ben Tzion Karsh, Matthew B. Weinger, Patricia A. Abbott, Robert L. Wears

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Current research suggests that the rate of adoption of health information technology (HIT) is low, and that HIT may not have the touted beneficial effects on quality of care or costs. The twin issues of the failure of HIT adoption and of HIT efficacy stem primarily from a series of fallacies about HIT. We discuss 12 HIT fallacies and their implications for design and implementation. These fallacies must be understood and addressed for HIT to yield better results. Foundational cognitive and human factors engineering research and development are essential to better inform HIT development, deployment, and use.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)617-623
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association
Volume17
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2010

    Fingerprint

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Informatics

Cite this