Harmonized Outcome Measures for Use in Atrial Fibrillation Patient Registries and Clinical Practice: Endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society Board of Trustees

Hugh Calkins, Richard E. Gliklich, Michelle B. Leavy, Jonathan P. Piccini, Jonathan C. Hsu, Sanghamitra Mohanty, William Lewis, Saman Nazarian, Mintu P. Turakhia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) affects an estimated 33 million people worldwide, leading to increased mortality and an increased risk of heart failure and stroke. Many AF patient registries exist, but the ability to link and compare data across registries is hindered by differences in the outcome measures collected by each registry and a lack of harmonization. Objectives: The purpose of this project was to develop a minimum set of standardized outcome measures that could be collected in AF patient registries and clinical practice. Methods: AF patient registries were identified through multiple sources and invited to join the workgroup and submit outcome measures. Additional measures were identified through literature searches and reviews of consensus statements. Outcome measures were categorized using the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's supported Outcome Measures Framework (OMF). A minimum set of broadly relevant measures was identified. Measure definitions were harmonized through in-person and virtual meetings. Results: One hundred twelve outcome measures, including those from thirteen registries, were curated according to the OMF and then harmonized into a minimum set of measures in the OMF categories of survival (3 measures), clinical response (3 measures), events of interest (9 measures), patient-reported outcomes (2 measures), and resource utilization (3 measures). The harmonized definitions build on existing consensus statements. Conclusions: The harmonized measures represent a minimum set of outcomes that are relevant in AF research and clinical practice. Routine and consistent collection of these measures in registries and in other systems would support creation of a research infrastructure to efficiently address new questions and improve patient outcomes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalHeart Rhythm
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Trustees
Atrial Fibrillation
Registries
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Health Services Research
Research
Heart Failure
Stroke

Keywords

  • Atrial fibrillation
  • Common data element
  • Data standard
  • Harmonization
  • Outcome measure
  • Patient outcome
  • Patient registry

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Physiology (medical)

Cite this

Harmonized Outcome Measures for Use in Atrial Fibrillation Patient Registries and Clinical Practice : Endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society Board of Trustees. / Calkins, Hugh; Gliklich, Richard E.; Leavy, Michelle B.; Piccini, Jonathan P.; Hsu, Jonathan C.; Mohanty, Sanghamitra; Lewis, William; Nazarian, Saman; Turakhia, Mintu P.

In: Heart Rhythm, 01.01.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Calkins, Hugh ; Gliklich, Richard E. ; Leavy, Michelle B. ; Piccini, Jonathan P. ; Hsu, Jonathan C. ; Mohanty, Sanghamitra ; Lewis, William ; Nazarian, Saman ; Turakhia, Mintu P. / Harmonized Outcome Measures for Use in Atrial Fibrillation Patient Registries and Clinical Practice : Endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society Board of Trustees. In: Heart Rhythm. 2018.
@article{e0dba4eae3be49e5b995adde3db00bb1,
title = "Harmonized Outcome Measures for Use in Atrial Fibrillation Patient Registries and Clinical Practice: Endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society Board of Trustees",
abstract = "Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) affects an estimated 33 million people worldwide, leading to increased mortality and an increased risk of heart failure and stroke. Many AF patient registries exist, but the ability to link and compare data across registries is hindered by differences in the outcome measures collected by each registry and a lack of harmonization. Objectives: The purpose of this project was to develop a minimum set of standardized outcome measures that could be collected in AF patient registries and clinical practice. Methods: AF patient registries were identified through multiple sources and invited to join the workgroup and submit outcome measures. Additional measures were identified through literature searches and reviews of consensus statements. Outcome measures were categorized using the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's supported Outcome Measures Framework (OMF). A minimum set of broadly relevant measures was identified. Measure definitions were harmonized through in-person and virtual meetings. Results: One hundred twelve outcome measures, including those from thirteen registries, were curated according to the OMF and then harmonized into a minimum set of measures in the OMF categories of survival (3 measures), clinical response (3 measures), events of interest (9 measures), patient-reported outcomes (2 measures), and resource utilization (3 measures). The harmonized definitions build on existing consensus statements. Conclusions: The harmonized measures represent a minimum set of outcomes that are relevant in AF research and clinical practice. Routine and consistent collection of these measures in registries and in other systems would support creation of a research infrastructure to efficiently address new questions and improve patient outcomes.",
keywords = "Atrial fibrillation, Common data element, Data standard, Harmonization, Outcome measure, Patient outcome, Patient registry",
author = "Hugh Calkins and Gliklich, {Richard E.} and Leavy, {Michelle B.} and Piccini, {Jonathan P.} and Hsu, {Jonathan C.} and Sanghamitra Mohanty and William Lewis and Saman Nazarian and Turakhia, {Mintu P.}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.hrthm.2018.09.021",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Heart Rhythm",
issn = "1547-5271",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Harmonized Outcome Measures for Use in Atrial Fibrillation Patient Registries and Clinical Practice

T2 - Endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society Board of Trustees

AU - Calkins, Hugh

AU - Gliklich, Richard E.

AU - Leavy, Michelle B.

AU - Piccini, Jonathan P.

AU - Hsu, Jonathan C.

AU - Mohanty, Sanghamitra

AU - Lewis, William

AU - Nazarian, Saman

AU - Turakhia, Mintu P.

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) affects an estimated 33 million people worldwide, leading to increased mortality and an increased risk of heart failure and stroke. Many AF patient registries exist, but the ability to link and compare data across registries is hindered by differences in the outcome measures collected by each registry and a lack of harmonization. Objectives: The purpose of this project was to develop a minimum set of standardized outcome measures that could be collected in AF patient registries and clinical practice. Methods: AF patient registries were identified through multiple sources and invited to join the workgroup and submit outcome measures. Additional measures were identified through literature searches and reviews of consensus statements. Outcome measures were categorized using the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's supported Outcome Measures Framework (OMF). A minimum set of broadly relevant measures was identified. Measure definitions were harmonized through in-person and virtual meetings. Results: One hundred twelve outcome measures, including those from thirteen registries, were curated according to the OMF and then harmonized into a minimum set of measures in the OMF categories of survival (3 measures), clinical response (3 measures), events of interest (9 measures), patient-reported outcomes (2 measures), and resource utilization (3 measures). The harmonized definitions build on existing consensus statements. Conclusions: The harmonized measures represent a minimum set of outcomes that are relevant in AF research and clinical practice. Routine and consistent collection of these measures in registries and in other systems would support creation of a research infrastructure to efficiently address new questions and improve patient outcomes.

AB - Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) affects an estimated 33 million people worldwide, leading to increased mortality and an increased risk of heart failure and stroke. Many AF patient registries exist, but the ability to link and compare data across registries is hindered by differences in the outcome measures collected by each registry and a lack of harmonization. Objectives: The purpose of this project was to develop a minimum set of standardized outcome measures that could be collected in AF patient registries and clinical practice. Methods: AF patient registries were identified through multiple sources and invited to join the workgroup and submit outcome measures. Additional measures were identified through literature searches and reviews of consensus statements. Outcome measures were categorized using the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's supported Outcome Measures Framework (OMF). A minimum set of broadly relevant measures was identified. Measure definitions were harmonized through in-person and virtual meetings. Results: One hundred twelve outcome measures, including those from thirteen registries, were curated according to the OMF and then harmonized into a minimum set of measures in the OMF categories of survival (3 measures), clinical response (3 measures), events of interest (9 measures), patient-reported outcomes (2 measures), and resource utilization (3 measures). The harmonized definitions build on existing consensus statements. Conclusions: The harmonized measures represent a minimum set of outcomes that are relevant in AF research and clinical practice. Routine and consistent collection of these measures in registries and in other systems would support creation of a research infrastructure to efficiently address new questions and improve patient outcomes.

KW - Atrial fibrillation

KW - Common data element

KW - Data standard

KW - Harmonization

KW - Outcome measure

KW - Patient outcome

KW - Patient registry

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85056229344&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85056229344&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.hrthm.2018.09.021

DO - 10.1016/j.hrthm.2018.09.021

M3 - Article

C2 - 30449519

AN - SCOPUS:85056229344

JO - Heart Rhythm

JF - Heart Rhythm

SN - 1547-5271

ER -