"Hardcore"definitions and their application to a population-based sample of smokers

Michelle L. Costa, Joanna E Cohen, Michael O. Chaiton, David Ip, Paul McDonald, Roberta Ferrence

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Introduction: As smoking prevalence declines, some suggest that so-called "hardcore" smokers will come to represent a growing and irreducible proportion of current smokers ("hardening hypothesis"). Different definitions of a "hardcore" smoker have been used in the literature. This paper describes population-based definitions of "hardcore" smokers and compares estimates of the prevalence of "hardcore" smokers derived using these definitions. Methods: Definitions identified in a comprehensive literature search were reduced to their component constructs. We estimated the prevalence of "hardcore" smokers as a proportion of all current adult smokers in Ontario, Canada, using data from the Ontario Tobacco Survey (2005-2008;N = 4,130). Definition concordance was examined using bivariate cross-tabulations. Results: Six definitions were identified in the literature. Five definitions included constructs of quit intentions and quit attempts, four included nicotine dependence, three included long-term use, and one included a measure of smoker knowledge about smoking hazards and confronting substantial societal disapprobation of smoking. Estimates of "hardcore" smoker prevalence in Ontario based on these definitions ranged from 0.03% to 13.77%. Conclusions: Estimates of the prevalence of "hardcore" smokers in Ontario varied considerably between the six definitions of the "hardcore" smokers found in the population-based literature. This study underscores the need for consensus on the best definition of "hardcore" smoker.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)860-864
Number of pages5
JournalNicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco
Volume12
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Ontario
Population
Smoking
Tobacco Use Disorder
Tobacco
Canada
Consensus

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

"Hardcore"definitions and their application to a population-based sample of smokers. / Costa, Michelle L.; Cohen, Joanna E; Chaiton, Michael O.; Ip, David; McDonald, Paul; Ferrence, Roberta.

In: Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, Vol. 12, No. 8, 02.07.2010, p. 860-864.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Costa, Michelle L. ; Cohen, Joanna E ; Chaiton, Michael O. ; Ip, David ; McDonald, Paul ; Ferrence, Roberta. / "Hardcore"definitions and their application to a population-based sample of smokers. In: Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco. 2010 ; Vol. 12, No. 8. pp. 860-864.
@article{e78eeb1dba794f088c78f28b0f3b7835,
title = "{"}Hardcore{"}definitions and their application to a population-based sample of smokers",
abstract = "Introduction: As smoking prevalence declines, some suggest that so-called {"}hardcore{"} smokers will come to represent a growing and irreducible proportion of current smokers ({"}hardening hypothesis{"}). Different definitions of a {"}hardcore{"} smoker have been used in the literature. This paper describes population-based definitions of {"}hardcore{"} smokers and compares estimates of the prevalence of {"}hardcore{"} smokers derived using these definitions. Methods: Definitions identified in a comprehensive literature search were reduced to their component constructs. We estimated the prevalence of {"}hardcore{"} smokers as a proportion of all current adult smokers in Ontario, Canada, using data from the Ontario Tobacco Survey (2005-2008;N = 4,130). Definition concordance was examined using bivariate cross-tabulations. Results: Six definitions were identified in the literature. Five definitions included constructs of quit intentions and quit attempts, four included nicotine dependence, three included long-term use, and one included a measure of smoker knowledge about smoking hazards and confronting substantial societal disapprobation of smoking. Estimates of {"}hardcore{"} smoker prevalence in Ontario based on these definitions ranged from 0.03{\%} to 13.77{\%}. Conclusions: Estimates of the prevalence of {"}hardcore{"} smokers in Ontario varied considerably between the six definitions of the {"}hardcore{"} smokers found in the population-based literature. This study underscores the need for consensus on the best definition of {"}hardcore{"} smoker.",
author = "Costa, {Michelle L.} and Cohen, {Joanna E} and Chaiton, {Michael O.} and David Ip and Paul McDonald and Roberta Ferrence",
year = "2010",
month = "7",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1093/ntr/ntq103",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
pages = "860--864",
journal = "Nicotine and Tobacco Research",
issn = "1462-2203",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - "Hardcore"definitions and their application to a population-based sample of smokers

AU - Costa, Michelle L.

AU - Cohen, Joanna E

AU - Chaiton, Michael O.

AU - Ip, David

AU - McDonald, Paul

AU - Ferrence, Roberta

PY - 2010/7/2

Y1 - 2010/7/2

N2 - Introduction: As smoking prevalence declines, some suggest that so-called "hardcore" smokers will come to represent a growing and irreducible proportion of current smokers ("hardening hypothesis"). Different definitions of a "hardcore" smoker have been used in the literature. This paper describes population-based definitions of "hardcore" smokers and compares estimates of the prevalence of "hardcore" smokers derived using these definitions. Methods: Definitions identified in a comprehensive literature search were reduced to their component constructs. We estimated the prevalence of "hardcore" smokers as a proportion of all current adult smokers in Ontario, Canada, using data from the Ontario Tobacco Survey (2005-2008;N = 4,130). Definition concordance was examined using bivariate cross-tabulations. Results: Six definitions were identified in the literature. Five definitions included constructs of quit intentions and quit attempts, four included nicotine dependence, three included long-term use, and one included a measure of smoker knowledge about smoking hazards and confronting substantial societal disapprobation of smoking. Estimates of "hardcore" smoker prevalence in Ontario based on these definitions ranged from 0.03% to 13.77%. Conclusions: Estimates of the prevalence of "hardcore" smokers in Ontario varied considerably between the six definitions of the "hardcore" smokers found in the population-based literature. This study underscores the need for consensus on the best definition of "hardcore" smoker.

AB - Introduction: As smoking prevalence declines, some suggest that so-called "hardcore" smokers will come to represent a growing and irreducible proportion of current smokers ("hardening hypothesis"). Different definitions of a "hardcore" smoker have been used in the literature. This paper describes population-based definitions of "hardcore" smokers and compares estimates of the prevalence of "hardcore" smokers derived using these definitions. Methods: Definitions identified in a comprehensive literature search were reduced to their component constructs. We estimated the prevalence of "hardcore" smokers as a proportion of all current adult smokers in Ontario, Canada, using data from the Ontario Tobacco Survey (2005-2008;N = 4,130). Definition concordance was examined using bivariate cross-tabulations. Results: Six definitions were identified in the literature. Five definitions included constructs of quit intentions and quit attempts, four included nicotine dependence, three included long-term use, and one included a measure of smoker knowledge about smoking hazards and confronting substantial societal disapprobation of smoking. Estimates of "hardcore" smoker prevalence in Ontario based on these definitions ranged from 0.03% to 13.77%. Conclusions: Estimates of the prevalence of "hardcore" smokers in Ontario varied considerably between the six definitions of the "hardcore" smokers found in the population-based literature. This study underscores the need for consensus on the best definition of "hardcore" smoker.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77955251361&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77955251361&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/ntr/ntq103

DO - 10.1093/ntr/ntq103

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - 860

EP - 864

JO - Nicotine and Tobacco Research

JF - Nicotine and Tobacco Research

SN - 1462-2203

IS - 8

ER -